Policed Masculinity and Sexual Identity Stigmas

1500 Words3 Pages

1. In Riseman and Seale’s chapter Betwixt and Be Tween, they focus on how sexual identity can be used to police a male’s masculinity. It can start with something as innocent as a shy, quiet boy who starts to be picked on because he is no assertive or aggressive like the other males. The way he is picked on can be the other boy’s called him a: faggot, gay, homo, or boy lover. This means at a young age boys start to think they have to be a certain way to seem manly: assertive, enjoy sports, and be better than girls in all aspects; these are just a few ways boys try to prove their masculinity. One example that proves this was discussed in this chapter. Some students, both male and female, are given a hypothetical situation about a boy, Marcus, …show more content…

One student even said she would not stay friends with Marcus because people might start to think that she is gay, too. Situations like these stem from the way boys think they have to act at such a young age. They are brought up thinking they have to be strong, rowdy, and play manly sports. As they get older this sticks with them, so when a male tries to break outside of it, they get referred to as gay and homosexual. This continues all their life and it effects many situations, like the way men have hook-ups. In the chapter Orgasm in College Hookups and Relationships the authors discuss how 74 percent of their respondents had at least one hookup by their senior year of college. The data also showed that men are almost always at least twenty percent more likely to orgasm than women. However, this is not true when a girl and guy are in a relationship. I think reasons for this could come from how males learn at a young age how masculinity and sexual orientation correlate. This leads to men thinking that the more females they have sex with, the more masculine they are. Also, the women do not orgasm because it is just about the guy having one, then being …show more content…

One of the presentations that I enjoyed the most was Pruva’s presentation on the misconceptions of arranged marriages. Before the presentation I had a negative view on arranged marriages but through the presentation I learned why it is not as bad as people think. The people being set up do not mind it, and 65 percent of Indian students believe that parents should have the final say or their marriage. There was also a study done proving that there is not a difference in happiness levels between arranged marriages verses love marriages. However, there is one thing she should of elaborated on; the definition of arranged marriages. She said arranged marriages are when a third party is involved. This was a little confusing because I am unsure if this means things like friends setting up people count, or if something like online dating websites would count. Though, overall it was a very good and informative presentation. Another presentation I enjoyed was the presentation on the age gap in relationships. I always thought an age gap was around five years or more but really it starts at about ten years. In this presentation I learned that society can make the relationships hard and even cause people to break up. Though, these people are really in love and it is not fair to them for society to negatively judge them. I also liked that she had been in an age gap relationship before so she could understand the emotions better. These presentations make the overall class experience

Open Document