Martin Luther King Injustice And Injustice Essay

622 Words2 Pages

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” Martin Luther King, Jr. stated. African Americans had endured persecution for decades- houses and churches burned down, sit-in participants got attacked, separate schools and lack of quality education systems. These all contributed to the fact that it was time to take action. They could not endure the torture, pain, and segregation anymore. In the First Amendment of the Constitution, it is stated that people have the right to peaceably assemble. All of the rallies that King participated in were in support of ending segregation. He also promoted the use of nonviolent action. King explained that in nonviolent campaigns there are four basic steps: determination of the presence of injustice, negotiation, self purification, and then direct action. It was evident that injustice existed through the laws; however, the debates that arose due to those laws were not always peaceful. There are laws which are just and there are laws which are unjust. Debates arose due to these laws, both by peaceful means, and by violence. King’s argument for breaking the law is that of morals. He wholeheartedly …show more content…

Lincoln still wanted order, while the people wanted change. While Lincoln was in a different period of African American discrimination than King was, he believed that laws should always be obeyed, just or unjust. Lincoln understood and promoted that the government could not last with all the hate that was going on. He knew of all the death and mourning that had taken place, just so people would have the freedoms they had. Lincoln said, “let every man remember that to violate the law, is to trample on the blood of his own, and his children’s liberty.” There is a thought process that each law goes through to even be considered, and Lincoln believed that laws were created to protect people and better the

Open Document