Man In The Water Analysis

595 Words2 Pages

Man in the Water Would you ever risk your life for strangers you don’t know? Would you save them over yourself, even when you know you wouldn’t survive? Well, that’s what one man on flight 90 did in the year 1982. Roger Rosenblatt wrote an article for Time Magazine explaining the actions this man took. Disasters can be strange, bring out the best in people, and show the connection between nature and man. This disaster was most definitely one of the strangest to occur. There were many details to this crash that made it so strange. One example was that the crash occurred at the site of a bridge. Not only did it occur at the site, but the plane also clipped the bridge. This wouldn’t be so unusual, other than the fact that the plane hit the bridge at the moment of high traffic. In the passage, Rosenblatt said, “hitting seven vehicles, killing four motorists and 74 passengers.” Another reason as to why this crash was strange, was it occurred in Washington, a place of form and regulation. Everything went as planned in this city, and this crash was not a part of the plan. …show more content…

In this story, the unidentified man known as, The Man in the Water, had the best brought out in him. Once the plane had crashed, he started helping others to the best of his ability. In the passage, it explained that every time a lifeline and floatation device was lowered to him he would pass it on to another passenger. This was a very heroic act, and it surprised and humbled many people. For example, Windsor, who was part of the helicopter team, explained how he felt about the hero’s actions. In the passage, Windsor said, “In a mass casualty you will find people like him, but I’ve never seen one with that commitment.” This just goes to show that he was very dedicated to helping people before helping

Open Document