Samurai vs Knight: A Comparative Battle Analysis

621 Words2 Pages

Samurai vs knight For year historians have argued over who would win in a one on one battle between the samurai and the knight. This essay gives you a clear view who would win and feels like you're back in time seeing the fighting to the death.While both of these historic figures have many similarities only one can win and i think it’s the samurai and this can be seen why in the essay below. The first way that samurais have an advantage is in armor and weapons.In document D it states many facts about the comparison of the samurai's armor and weapons to the knights. Terry bennett the author of document D claims, ¨A knight armor could weigh 40-60 pounds.¨ The knights had the disadvantage in the situation. For the suits they wear were so heavy the were not able to move as fast as the samurai giving the them the upper hand and a better attack.Another piece of evidence that supports my claim is in document D by Terry Bennett. It states, ¨As more powerful weapons such as , crossbows and longbows became more . In document E written by Yamaga Soko and Le Morte. It says, “He stands in physical readiness for any call to service...keeps weapons ready for use.”The samurais were always ready for battle for this gives them the advantage. The advantage was that they were always physically fit and prepared. Another piece of evidence was found in document F and G written by Christine de Pizan and Yamaoto Tsunetomo. This document claims , “Worse to put yourself in a position to be killed. A knight shouldn’t feel bound by such an oath” A knight didn't feel bound to keep an oath if their life was on the lie even though their religion say they should keep promises. Unlike the knight the samurai thought it was honorable to die if you lived by the code and did everything honorably. So in this case if the samurai ever got the knight in a position to die the knight might back out and lose the

More about Samurai vs Knight: A Comparative Battle Analysis

Open Document