King Louis XIV An Absolute Monarchy

1480 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Absolute monarchies thesis

An Absolute Monarchy is when the people or person in power have total control of the people and the country, and has unrestricted political power. The question at hand now is, was the government of King Louis XIV an absolute monarchy? First this essay will answer the question that King Louis was an absolute monarch. Next the the essay will then talk about the arguments that can be made to contradict the idea that he was an absolute monarch. Finally, this essay will talk about how the answer to the question has better evidence proving that the argument that King Louis was an absolute monarch is stronger than the argument that he was not. In my opinion the answer to the question, “was the government of King Louis XIV an absolute monarchy?”,
No one disobeyed him and they all moved into the palace. Everyday these nobles would dress him each by one article of clothing and it was considered a privilege to do so. Also the nobles would gather around him and watch him eat. Again these people would be considered privileged if he talked to one of them. This just shows how he had the people submitting to his will because of the people dressing him and watching him eat, as well as being able to make changes as he wishes shown by his ability to move the government to his palace. Another piece of evidence that proves that King Louis was an absolute monarch is Louis XIV: The Metier du Roi. “To be well informed on an infinite number of matters about which we are supposed to know nothing.”(J. Longnon 48-57) This is a quote that relates to King Louis being an absolute monarch because it is saying that it is important to know about everything that is going on with the people he rules and the people that he does not. An example of this would be him having all his nobles move into his palace. He did this so that he could keep a closer eye on them and see what they are up to, as well as the nobles that would spy on each other to gossip about which would eventually get to the king. The final example proving that King Louis XIV was an absolute monarch is Duc de Saint-Simon: Memoires: The Aristocracy Undermined in France. “Frequent fetes… pleasing him.” (Ranum, Ranum pg 81, 83,
“There was nothing he liked so much as flattery.” (De Rouvroy) This quote could discredit the fact that his nobles would submit to his power out of fear. Because he loved flattery the nobles might have only surrendered to him because they knew that his weakness was flattery. They might have only done things for him such as dressing him and accompanying him while he is eating so that they could be on better terms with him and they might get some benefit for doing these things for him, not because they were afraid of him. Frederick William, The Great Elector : A Secret Letter: Monarchical Authority in Prussia, is another source that has ideas that can counter the fact that King Louis was absolute. The quotation “Take advantage of the advice of the clergy and nobility as much as you can; listen to them and be gracious to them all, as befits one of your position,” (Snyder pg 94-95) talks about how King Louis should listen to the advice that the nobles and clergy give to him. The reason this can make him non absolute is because he could have been making decisions based on what other people telling him. He is not making his own decisions on what he thinks is correct, he is listening to the opinion of other unlike an absolute monarch. Finally Duc de Saint-Simon: Memoires: The Aristocracy Undermined in France, can also go against the idea that King Louis was not absolute. A quote from this text, “These secret communications…

Show More
Related

  • Sun King Louis Xiv Dbq

    1280 Words  | 3 Pages

    Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, was an absolutist monarch of France who sought to heavily suppress the power of novels while simultaneously promoting the ideals of a “divine right monarchy”. A man notorious for his incredible spending on various personal ventures, such as the extremely costly construction of a new palace at Versailles, Louis XIV was often the subject of criticism and mockery, especially from the nobles who hoped to discredit him and his absolutist regime. Overall, Louis XIV did predominantly act in a manner with his own personal agenda in mind, as seen through his Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, occurring as a result of his desire to have his country fall in line with his own beliefs, his unrelenting expenditures

    Read More

  • Analysis Of William Doyle's 'The French Revolution'

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his book The French Revolution, William Doyle talks about the king’s power before the The French Revolution. Doyle explains that the king has an absolute monarchy over the citizens in France. An absolute monarchy is when a king or queen has full control over his citizens. The king is the judge, jury, and the executioner for his people. Whatever the king decides goes, no one has a say in what he has decided on. There are several examples that Doyle talks about in his book that shows how King Louis the 16th had an absolute monarchy over his citizens before 1787.

    Read More

  • Duc De Saint-Simon: King Louis XIV Of France

    511 Words  | 2 Pages

    He moved his court because he did not feel safe in Paris and could watch over his court officials due to living so close to one another. This piece certainly provides evidence of what Louis himself valued, but perhaps these attributes are needed to effectively rule with absolutism. Throughout this entire document, the author is implying how great Louis is as a person and an effective ruler. He even goes to list his issues: “All his faults were produced by his surroundings...soon found out his weak point, namely, his love of hearing his own praises” (Saint-Simon). Louis cared deeply regarding his personal image and these weaknesses do not seem that drastic, but according to him, “It was this love of praise which made it easy for Louvois to engage him in serious wars” (Saint-Simon). The text gives historians information about Louis’ love-affair with Mademoiselle de la Valliere, compelling his courtiers to spend more than they earned creating a dependency, and other interesting details regarding his life that are excluded in textbooks. Overall, this document provides a deeper insight to King Louis XIV personality and justifications for why he chose the actions he did. Duc de Saint-Simon, someone that resided at the Palace of Versailles, can provide information about a man that ruled with an iron fist over his

    Read More

  • Louis XIV and Peter The Great

    834 Words  | 2 Pages

    nation. In order to become a true absolute ruler Louis xiv needed to make sure

    Read More

  • Absolute Monarchy in Different Empires Throughout History

    1105 Words  | 3 Pages

    Absolute monarchs ruled though the policy of absolutism. Absolutism declared that the king ruled though divine right with a legitimate claim to sole and uncontested authority (French State Building and Louis XIV). On this basis, Louis XIV of France and Suleiman I of the Ottoman Empire were both absolute monarchs. Each ruler believed that his power belonged to him and him alone due to divine right. They showed their absolute power by living lavishly, increased their power by waging wars, and kept their power by ensuring complete loyalty of their subjects.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of the Characteristics of the Absolutist Rule of Charles I of England and Louis XIV of France

    1583 Words  | 4 Pages

    A Comparison of the Characteristics of the Absolutist Rule of Charles I of England and Louis XIV of France

    Read More

  • Imperialism And Absolutism In Molière's Tartuffe

    952 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Tartuffe, the nobility (mostly Orgon and his mother) is depicted as being fools because of the way they are easily tricked by the “holy impostor”. When Madame Pernelle praises Tartuffe for being a good holy man, her grandson Damis says “No, look you, madame, neither father nor anything else can oblige me to have any regard for him. I should belie my heart to tell you otherwise. To me his actions are perfectly odious; and I foresee that, one time or other, matters will come to extremity between that wretch and me” (Act 1, Scene 1). This representation of the nobility places them exactly where Louis intended. Spielvogel says that Louis removed the nobles from the royal council and lured them to be part of his court as a way to keep them occupied with trivial matters and out of important roles in politics

    Read More

  • Louis XIV

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    When Louis the XIV began his rule in 1643, his actions immediately began to suggest and absolute dictatorship. Because of the misery he had previously suffered, one of the first things he did was to decrease the power of the nobility. He withdrew himself from the rich upper class, doing everything secretly. The wealth had no connection to Louis, and therefore all power they previously had was gone. He had complete control over the nobles, spying, going through mail, and a secret police force made sure that Louis had absolute power. Louis appointed all of his officials, middle class men who served him without wanting any power. Louis wanted it clear that none of his power would be shared. He wanted "people to know by the rank of the men who served him that he had no intention of sharing power with them." If Louis XIV appointed advisors from the upper classes, they would expect to gain power, and Louis was not willing to give it to them. The way Louis XIV ruled, the sole powerful leader, made him an absolute ruler. He had divine rule, and did not want to give any power to anyone other than himself. These beliefs made him an absolute ruler.

    Read More

  • Differences Between Louis Xiv And Peter The Great

    674 Words  | 2 Pages

    Louis XIV is considered the “perfect absolutist” and he has been said to have been one of the greatest rulers in France’s history. He came up with several different strategic plans to gain absolute

    Read More

  • Louis XIV

    967 Words  | 2 Pages

    (*1) “At the same time he regarded himself as God's deputy in France and would

    Read More

  • The Most Successful Absolute Monarch in Europe was Louis XIV of France

    1549 Words  | 4 Pages

    Of all the absolute rulers in Europe, by far the best example of one, and the most powerful, was Louis XIV of France. Although Louis had some failures, he also had many successes. He controlled France’s money and had many different ways to get, as well as keep his power, and he knew how to delegate jobs to smart, but loyal people.

    Read More

  • The Palace of Versailles and the Absolutism of Louis XIV

    1705 Words  | 4 Pages

    Absolutism describes a form of monarchical power that is unrestrained by all other institutions, such as churches, legislatures, or social elites. To achieve absolutism one must first promote oneself as being powerful and authoritative, then the individual must take control of anyone who might stand in the way of absolute power. The Palace of Versailles helped King Louis XIV fulfill both of those objectives. Versailles used propaganda by promoting Louis with its grandiosity and generous portraits that all exuded a sense of supremacy. Versailles also helped Louis take control of the nobility by providing enough space to keep them under his watchful eye. The Palace of Versailles supported absolutism during King Louis XIV’s reign through propaganda, and control of nobility.

    Read More

  • The Theory of Absolutism

    3286 Words  | 7 Pages

    One of the chief theorists of divine-right monarchy in the seventeenth century was the French theologian and court preacher Bishop Jacques Bossuet (1627-1704), who expressed his ideas in a book entitled Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture. Bossuet argued first that govemment was divinely ordained so that humans could live in an organized society. Of all forms of gov ernment, monarchy, he averred, was the most general, most ancient, most natural, and the best, since God established kings and through them reigned over all the peoples of the world. Since kings received their power from God, their authority was absolute. They were re sponsible to no one (including parliaments) except God. Nevertheless, Bossuet cautioned, although a king's au thority was absolute, his power was not since he was limited by the law of God. Bossuet believed there was a difference between absolute monarchy and arbitrary monarchy. The latter contradicted the rule of law and the sanctity of property and was simply lawless tyranny. Bossuet's distinction between absolute and arbitrary gov emment was not always easy to maintain. There was also a large gulf between the theory of absolutism as ex pressed by Bossuet and the practice of absolutism. As we shall ...

    Read More

  • The Absolute Monarchy Of France In The 17th Century

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    This historical study will define the absolute monarchy as it was defied through the French government in the 17th century. The term ‘absolute” is defined I the monarchy through the absolute control over the people through the king and the royal family. All matters of civic, financial, and political governance was controlled through the king’s sole power as the monarchical ruler of the French people. In France, Louis XIII is an important example of the absolute monarchy, which controlled all facts of military and economic power through a single ruler. Udder Louis XIII’s reign, the consolidation of power away from the Edicts of Nantes to dominant local politics and sovereignty in Europe. These forms of absolute power define the role of the monarch in controlling the people without the influence of the nobility or a parliament in the decision making process. In essence, the various aspects of absolute monarchy will be defined win the example of , Louis XIII as the sole sovereign of his people during the 17th century.

    Read More

  • Justification of French Revolution

    1757 Words  | 4 Pages

    The French citizens were correct in overthrowing the French monarchy because King Louis XVI was a poor leader. One of the qualities that made King Louis XVI a poor leader was that he was not interested in ruling the country. According to the World History Textbook, “He was easily bored with affairs of state and much preferred to spend his time in physical activities.” (Beck Roger, Black Linda, Krieger, Larry, Naylor Phillip, Shabaka Dahia, 653) It is obvious that King Louis XVI was more interested in personal enjoyment then the livelihood of his country. He would rather be noble having fun rather than being a leader making decisions for his country. When King Louis XVI was removed from power, he was given what he wanted, the escape from the affairs of state. Another example why King L...

    Read More

More about King Louis XIV An Absolute Monarchy

Open Document