Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

1063 Words3 Pages

In the passionate play of Julius Caesar, full of betrayal, trials, and patriotism, one can find an incredibly good example of the power of rhetoric. This Shakespearean play, though titled Julius Caesar, does not revolve around said man but instead revolves around one of his murderers and once beloved friend, Brutus. After Caesar's murder, Brutus gives a speech to the citizens of Rome, explaining why he committed such an act and cleverly (attempts) to use rhetoric to change the angry minds of the Romans to side with him.

After Brutus gives his influential speech, he allows Antony to give one to the people. Antony was not involved in the coup to murder Caesar. No, not at all, in fact, he was a loyal friend to Caesar and quite distraught …show more content…

Brutus then says that, though he loved Julius Caesar dearly, he loved Rome more, which appeared to be a form of patriotism, though perhaps somewhat warped (Act 3.2, lines 17-24). And though he knew the virtues of the man he killed, and stated them, he also claimed to see too much ambition in Caesar. He then allows the people to object to his statements if they wish to, but (as can be seen clearly), he seemed to have already won them over.

Brutus goes on to say how, had he been in Caesar's place and had been too ambitious as he had been, he should expect the same treatment handed to him, that is, he would expect to be taken out of commission (Act 3.2, lines 36-40). In this, he puts himself on Caesar's level and shows that he does not think more highly of himself than Caesar, but he merely did what he thought was best for Rome. He then allows Mark Antony to bring Caesar's body so that the people may mourn him, yet another way to show that he was not against Caesar, but was for the …show more content…

Antony continues to act this way but claims that he acts in such a way because, "...My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it com back to me (Act 3.2, lines 107-109)."

At this point, the Romans are practically shrugging their shoulders and mumbling, "He has a point," but they have not been convinced wholly. So, Antony continues. Antony says that had it been more than a day ago, anything Caesar would have said would have been revered as complete legitimacy, which was certainly true. But, the man says, he would not incite rage in the peoples, for that would be wronging Brutus and the murderers, whom he continues to call "honorable" mockingly.

Then, Antony pulls out the (possibly forged) will of Caesar, using material objects to win over the hearts of the men. He states, "Let but the commons hear this testament - which, pardon me, I do not mean to read - and they would go and kiss dead Caesar's wounds and dip their napkins in his sacred blood (Act 3.2, lines 132-135)..." Of course, saying that he wouldn't read it to them only makes the Roman citizens all the more curious, like children awaiting their Christmas gifts. To top it off, he states that if they heard it they would only be inflamed with love for Caesar, and would cause trouble. And, because

Open Document