Jan Van Eyck's Iconography Analysis

181 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays on jan van eyck paintings

Iconography is defined as the study of various subject matters and conventional symbols in works of art (Cothran, Stokstad 1141). In art history, iconography is used to study the interpretation of the artwork such as the composition and the artistic style of the piece. Iconography used regarding the interpretation of Jan van Eyck’s Double Portriat of Giovanni Arnolfini and His Wife includes the debate as to whether or not the artwork represents a wedding or a double portrait. The piece shows a man and women holding hands and with their shoes off indicating a sacred event is taking place. A single candle is lit on the chandelier representing the presents of God. Through iconography analysis, these details indicate that the artwork is portraying

Show More
Related

  • Comparison of Las Meninas and Arnolfini Double Portrait

    1294 Words  | 3 Pages

    Arnolfini Double Portrait was painted in 1434, by Jan van Eyck; who hard already gained attention and admiration through earlier works, such as the Ghent Altarpiece. The subject of Arnolfini Double Portrait, also known as The Arnolfini Portrait, is the italian merchant Giovanni Di Nicolao Arnolfini and his first wife inside of a room filled with objects teeming with symbolism. The depth is divided into a familiar three layers, a foreground, which is composed of a dog and a pair of sandals; a middle ground which features the two main subjects of the painting; and background, which contains the rest of the objects in the painting. The painting is symmetrical and the vanishing point is not far from the center of the painting along the horizontal. The paining is filled with symbolism and items meant to portray the subjects' distinguished lifestyle. Although, what some of the objects actually symbolize can be interpreted in slightly varying ways. To begin, many of the ob...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Stavelot Triptych

    1064 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Stavelot Triptych is stunning in its complexity and artistry. It was created by unknown artists, around mid-12th century, possibly for Abbot Wibald, in modern-day Mosan, Belgium. This artwork is currently on display in the Jerusalem exhibit at the MET. The Stavelot Triptych not only tells the story of the True Cross, but it shows the division of the Roman Empire, division of Christianity and the artistic differences between the East and the West. This formal analysis will express how the structure/shape, color, line, composition and techniques/ textures contribute to the meaning of the triptych.

    Read More

  • Analysis: Giovanni Arnolfini And His Wife

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    The painting, Giovanni Arnolfini and His Wife is full of many different symbolic objects and hidden meanings. Many of these symbolic objects require some background knowledge regarding the time period and the traditions and practices. This makes analyzing the painting and trying to make connections much harder for the everyday viewer. In conclusion, Jan Van Eyck’s painting Giovanni Arnolfini and His Wife too complex for the everyday viewer and is filled with symbolic objects and hidden meanings that can be

    Read More

  • The Arnolfini Double Portrait

    2458 Words  | 5 Pages

    ​One of the most noteworthy northern European writers of the Renaissance was the Flemish painter, Jan van Eyck. Although there are few records about his early life and rise to prominence, the Van Eyck family was well regarded within the Burgundian Netherlands which allowed historians to surmise that he was born in the 1380s. After years of travelling through various northern courts and gaining esteem, Jan van Eyck painted perhaps his most famous work, The Arnolfini Double Portrait. This work has been the subject of a great deal of critical analysis as a piece of Renaissance art. Some historians have found that the work is demonstrative of artistic and social ideals that were both ahead of its time and touted the line of controversy. However, taking into account the painting’s patronage, symbolism, artistic style, and function, it becomes clear that The Arnolfini Double Portrait is an exemplar of the Renaissance era artistic conventions and is not as difficult to parse as some critics would believe. In order to discuss the painting in its entirety, it is necessary to explore the context of the painting’s creation.

    Read More

  • outline of Vincent Van Gogh

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    1.Van Gogh attended a boarding school in Zevenbergen from when he was ten to twelve.

    Read More

  • The Power of a Symbol in The Yellow Wallpaper, The Glass Menagerie and The Lottery

    1665 Words  | 4 Pages

    Years ago, Sister Mary Corita Kent, a celebrated artist and educator of the 1960’s and 1970’s stated, “A painting is a symbol for the universe. Inside it, each piece relates to the other. Each piece is only answerable to the rest of that little world. So, probably in the total universe, there is that kind of total harmony, but we get only little tastes of it” (Lewis "Quotes from Women Artists"). Nowadays, a painting is not the main form of art humans appreciate. In fact, literature of all sorts can be considered a different form of art and often found in literature are symbols. A "symbol" is an object, person or action which represents an abstract idea (Warren “English 102”). In literature, a symbol or set of symbols can have a wide range of meanings. For example, color is a universal symbol; some may say it is a general symbol for life. However, each color separately can symbolize something different depending on the context. Analyzing five piece of literature for symbolism, one will be able to gain a deeper understating of symbols.

    Read More

  • Jan Van Eyck Research Paper

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jan van Eyck (Johannes de Eyck) was born sometime before c. 1395 and died somewhere around July 9, 1441. Lots of people consider Eyck one of the best painters in the early 15th century. Eyck was a Netherlandish painter in Bruges and was known to be one of the best Northern European painters. Eyck invented oil painting, and achieved many new techniques. He had two brothers/painters whose names are Hubert van Eyck and Lambert van Eyck. He also has a sister, Margareta van Eyck. Jan Van Eyck married a lady, Margaret, who was much younger than he was. They had one daughter together, whose name is Lievine. They came from the town Maaseik in Limburg, Belgium. Jan van Eyck had a very high salary. He was the valet de chambre (a butler) to the Duke.

    Read More

  • Jan Van Eyck Research Paper

    566 Words  | 2 Pages

    The most well respected example of this is found in the Arnolfini Wedding. The subject of this portrait is Mr. Arnolfini and his wife. In the artwork, Mr. Arnolfini is holding his wife’s right hand with his left, symbolising a left handed marriage. Indicating that Mr. Arnolfini is of a higher social class than his bride to be. Also, to reinforce the scene of holy matrimony, their shoes are removed indicating a holy place, and a small pet dog is pictured, alluding to loyalty in marriage. Furthermore, the Arnolfini’s display deeply held Catholic views, portrayed by rosary beads in the corner, a chair depicting Saint Margaret and the dragon, and the mirror in the background revealing the story of the passion of the Christ. Jan Van Eyck, through his use of symbolism, narrated the lives of others in his

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Ghent Altarpiece

    734 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Ghent Altarpiece painted in completeness by Jan and Hubert van Eyck in 1432. This altarpiece is filled with symbolism. One of the most important pieces of the altar is the Deity Enthroned, which represents the Lord in Christianity. The painting covered with symbols and words. The artists portrays many signs with different meanings from the deity’s clothes to the background.

    Read More

  • Jan Van Eyck Leal Souvenir Analysis

    155 Words  | 1 Pages

    Léal Souvenir is a 1432 oil-on-oak panel portrait by the Early Netherlandish painter Jan van Eyck. The panel was purchased in 1857 by the National Gallery, London, where it is on permanent display. The sitter has not been identified, but his individualistic features suggest a historical person rather than the hypothetical ideal usual in contemporary northern Renaissance portraiture. The portrait contains three layers of painted inscriptions, each rendered to look as if chiseled into stone. The first inscription is in a form of Greek and seems to spell "TYΜ.ωΘΕΟC", which has not been satisfactorily interpreted but has inspired some to title the work Timotheus. The middle lettering reads in French Leal Souvenir ("Loyal Memory") and indicates

    Read More

  • Comparative Formal Analysis; Similar on Account of Distinctions

    1133 Words  | 3 Pages

    The analysis of a work of art can help the viewer, and the reader of the analysis for that matter, to better understand the relationships of the physical elements of the piece. This kind of analysis can then lead the viewer or reader on the pathway of comprising a richer understanding and appreciation of the mood created through the physical criteria of form. Analyzing two works that both embody a few common characteristics can help one to understand more thoroughly not only each of the two pieces independently, but the two together, comparatively. The two pieces in discussion here are comparable in very few categories of elements, however can be analyzed in comparison to each other. A Japanese woodblock print entitled Kusano Kanpei at Totsuka and a tempera panel painting from Italy called Madonna and Child and Crucifixion are the two highly distinctive, yet surprisingly similar pieces. Although these two works range in time period, process, visual form, and individual style, they can be compared through their few common aspects; each of the two pieces is recognizably stylized to it's own highly specific time period, and both of the works create, through form, an intimate space between the piece's images and the viewer.

    Read More

  • Giovanni Arnolfini And His Bride

    257 Words  | 1 Pages

    Jan van Eyck painted Giovanni Arnolfini and His Bride. He painted this piece with oil on wood in 1434. The painting was thought to be of a couple taking vows because they are holding hands. The couples clothing provides the audience with the suggestion that the couple is wealthy. The women is wearing a plain necklace. The woman shows an apparent bulge. This bulge could be from a pregnancy or the woman is just holding up her full-skirted dress in the contemporary fashon. The more clothing a person wore the richer they were. In addition, the house suggest that the couple is wealthy. There is a chandelier and room decorations. There is two candles in the chandelier. One is lit while the other is burnt out.

    Read More

  • Van Eyck's The Arnolfini Wedding

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    You can also see the man with his left hand not grasping the ladies hand, but supporting it which represents his oath to her. Another is the removal of the shoes suggesting sanctity. As you may have noticed there is a small terrier beside the couple, he serves as not only a pet, but as a symbol of fidelity and due to its rare breed he shows the wealth they must have to own him. In any marriage you need a witness and at first it seems as if there is not one, but looking close enough into the mirror behind them in the reflection you can see someone. Van Eyck is shown in this reflection and is indeed the couples witness and above the mirror is an inscription on the wall the translates to “Jan Van Eyck was here, 1434”. The mirror is absolutely spotless showing purity and the prayer beads of Saint Margaret represent a protection the women will have in childbirth. If the audience were to look at the window seal they would be able to see an orange thats shows innocence and wealth. These are some of the many easily spotted hidden meanings shown in Van Eyck’s portrait, but some take a more experienced eye to

    Read More

  • Margarete Van Eyck And The Horned Headdress In The 15th Century

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    The 15th century saw a number of new varieties of headdresses. Instead of being broad, headdresses tended to be high, occasionally extremely high. Around 1410, the horned headdress came into fashion. Pictured to the right is Margarete van Eyck, wearing a horned headdress with a ruffled veil called a kruseler. Her red down is lined in grey fur, and this painting is from 1439, painted by Jan van Eyck. (National Gallery, London) The horned headdress had a wirelike structure like the horns of a cow on which the veil was placed. This style was followed by the heart shaped headdress, the shape of which can be explained by its name. Both styles were an attempt to use the veil as a decorative attraction, which was the opposite of its original purpose.

    Read More

  • The Last Judgement Michelangelo Analysis

    633 Words  | 2 Pages

    Perspective is based on Jesus in this painting due to his outward “radiant glow of divine light” (1) extending to the other people in the painting. The main focus is on Jesus and the rest of the figures are diffused in an outward fashion from Jesus himself. The artist himself expresses an emphasis on individualism by implementing himself within the painting by appearing “twice in the Last Judgement: in the flayed skin which Saint Bartholomew is carrying in his left hand, and the figure… who is looking encouragingly at those rising from their graves” (2). This is an action that only a Renaissance painter would do, which is displaying individuality through a self-portrait because of the possibility of being judged for selfishness. Light and shadowing is prominent within the art which is shown in the painting when the lighter, more brighter colors are focused in the middle and then fade into darker tones while moving outward into the

    Read More

More about Jan Van Eyck's Iconography Analysis

Open Document