Influence Of Buddhism And Buddhism In Southeast Asia

1660 Words4 Pages

For centuries, Buddhism and Hinduism have had a significant impact on various areas of the world. Many have adopted and integrated the aspects of these religious into their architecture, specifically Southeast Asia. While both Buddhism and Hinduism has had a significant impact separately in several areas such as China and India, the combination of the two have been influential to religious architecture in Southeast Asia.
The maritime Southeast Asia region was in my opinion, a predominant factor that arguably led to its social-economic development. The Hindu and Buddhist religions that originated in the Indian subcontinent was found to be immensely popular in the Asia region as it swept across east of Asia due to its holistic spiritual and uniting principles. The principles advanced social hierarchy and it is believed that it helped to influence the culture of the people. “The earliest material evidence of Hinduism in Southeast Asia comes from Borneo, where late 4th-century Sanskrit inscriptions testify to the performance of Vedic sacrifices by Brahmans at the behest of local chiefs. Chinese chronicles attest to an Indian like kingdom in Vietnam two centuries earlier. The dominant form of Hinduism exported to Southeast Asia was Shaivism, though some Vaishnavism was also known there. Later, from the 9th century onward, Tantrism, both Hindu and Buddhist, spread throughout the region.”
Having both originated from the Indian continent, both religions, while maintaining the fundamental differences in alignments was encratic in nature. Religious syncretism also led to the common alignment of shaping the physical aspects of their lives in accordance to the architectural principles; the Mandela. “The Mandala is a spiri...

... middle of paper ...

...nto religion, one must ponder significance in today’s modernized world. With technology and signs increasingly championing the power of reason today, many religions have seen their members and followers stagnate or decline. Considering the compromise and accommodation of temple locations and orientations in a colonial-era should one consider commodification, a similar compromise to remain relevant in the modern world? One can observe that although several principles have been compromising modernity, religion at its core has remained true to its teachings and principles. As a physical embodiment however, the architecture today presents a certain image of itself to the rest of the world. It remains to be seen as to what extent such architectural changes suit the changes of the world today and to which extent do they begin to present religion in an unsuitable manner.

Open Document