Importance Of Teamwork In Healthcare

920 Words2 Pages

General research question – what was the reason for this study?
This study wanted to know if there are deep contextual factors that influence a team’s performance in healthcare. And provide evidence-based recommendations on teamwork training programs (such as content, duration and frequency of programs).

Healthcare depends on good teamwork and communication of healthcare providers. But there needs to be further study of two aspects; firstly study in a hospital setting the effects of understanding/validating teamwork by studying questionnaires and examine the staff’s perception of their teamwork. Secondly they wanted to explore in the surgical ward the effects of team training and it’s impact on teamwork, and in turn for time-based patient …show more content…

It needed to be evidence-based research, so Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS®) teamwork system was used. And the human factors theoretical framework, Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 model (SEIPS 2.0) was used for studying patient safety related to teamwork in the hospital.

Specific hypothesis (or hypotheses) – what specific question was asked?
What is the framework for defining efficiency, competency and communication within teamwork at hospitals?
Is there is a correlation between healthcare staff’s effective teamwork and team trainings in relation to patient safety and outcomes?

Participants (age, gender, background)
There were 5 hospitals in Norway involved in the study (both acute and nonacute), with the study starting in December 2015.

There was two parts to this study - Part 1 (study 1, 2) was defined as descriptive, and explorative design methods, Part 2 (study 3, 4, 5, 6) is quasi-experimental, it had six sub-studies with various aims, designs and methods. Statistics were also taken from each hospital ward, “examples of variables are “number of physicians, registered nurses, assistant nurses, beds, frequency of …show more content…

120 healthcare personnel working in 3 surgical departments in 3 different hospitals. Study #4 involved approx. 20 physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses, in the surgical ward of one hospital. Study #5 was patients admitted to the surgical ward of a single hospital and were 18 years or older, understand the Norwegian language, are in a mental/physical health condition which allows them to participate in this study with a power analysis conducted. Study #6 is anonymous patient data from the same hospital as study #5, with a power analysis regarding the number of patients’ medical records is conducted.

Experimental task
There was two parts to this study - Part 1 (study 1, 2) was defined as descriptive, and explorative design methods, Part 2 (study 3, 4, 5, 6) is quasi-experimental, it had six sub-studies with various aims, designs and methods. The studies #3, #5, #6 involved quasi-experimental design, meaning subjects are not randomly assigned as they would be in an experimental study.

In study #3 was exploring the impact of “an inter-professional teamwork intervention in a surgical ward with regard to team decision making, patient safety culture and teamwork”. In the surgical department at 3 hospitals there was a questionnaire administered before to a controlled group. There was 6 hours of team training and execution of tools and strategies then 2 questionnaires afterwards (after 6 months and 12

Open Document