Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Kent is critical to King Lear
Literary analysis shakespeare
King lear critical interpretations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Kent is critical to King Lear
The Tragedy King Lear: An Analysis While almost everyone has heard of the name Shakespeare, very few people have read one of his scripts. Shakespeare’s plays, written in “Early Modern English,” provide quite a challenge for many who would consider themselves to be advanced readers. The complex plot, characters, language, and other elements are often difficult to decrypt. However, decrypting the script of The Tragedy of King Lear has been an extremely rewarding and exciting experience. King Lear is the story of the collapse of Lear’s kingdom, family, and most importantly his sanity. To begin, the University of Louisville Department of Theatre Arts and Commonwealth Theatre Center adopted a unique interpretation of the script. The use of Aristotle’s spectacle aids in unifying the scene with the entire …show more content…
Specifically, Kent’s character provides the story with a perplexing plot of its own. Kent is a faithful servant to King Lear, however he is quick to disagree with Lear’s treatment of Cordelia in Act I, Scene I. Kent responds to Lear, “Be Kent unmannerly / When Lear is mad.” (Pg. 17) His words show a high degree of dedication to Lear that goes beyond his typical duties as a nobleman. Kent shows his loyalty to Lear through his return, even after Lear has banished him for speaking out. When Kent returns in disguise as “Caius,” this is a complex development of his personality and how he treats Lear with a newfound respect. As Caius, he shows no past resentment towards Lear for banishing him and maintains his sense of humor without being revealed as Kent. In the last scene of the play, after Lear dies, Kent says, “I have a journey, sir, shortly to go. / My master calls me. I must not say no.” (Pg. 261) The few lines suggest that he plans to soon die as to serve Lear in the afterlife. The depth of Kent’s character through his words and actions are exemplary to Aristotle’s element of
truthful. Kent believes that Lear is wrong and openly tells him so. He says in
Harbage, Alfred. " King Lear: An Introduction." Shakespeare: The Tragedies: A Collection of Critical Essays.
Now, banished Kent,/ If thou canst serve where thou dost stand condemned,/ So may it come thy master, whom thou lov'st,/ Shall find thee full of labors.”( Act 1, Sc. 4 Ln. 1-8). This quote demonstrates that Kent is willing to demote himself in order to aid the king that he loves so dearly. Kent is cognizant that Lear is not acting properly when he sends Cordelia away and Kent is banished for protesting the command. Despite the unseemly action, Kent decides to return to the king’s side and help him along his journey. Shakespeare uses Lear’s descent into madness to show the devastating effects flattery and lies can have on what a person believes as truth. Kent continues the lie that Lear still has power through his devotion only fit for a king. In Kent’s well intentioned yet misguided quest to hold true to his king, he accentuates the effect of Lear’s inaccurate perception of what has transpired. “Your servant Kent. Where is your servant Caius?/ He's a good fellow, I can tell you that./ He'll strike, and quickly too.”(Act 5, Scn. 3, Ln. 342-345). Kent continues his devoted loyalty and attempts to withhold his
King Lear is often regarded as one of Shakespeare’s finest pieces of literature. One reason this is true is because Shakespeare singlehandedly shows the reader what the human condition looks like as the play unfolds. Shakespeare lets the reader watch this develop in Lear’s own decisions and search for the purpose of life while unable to escape his solitude and ultimately his own death. Examining the philosophies Shakespeare embeds into the language and actions of King Lear allows the reader a better understanding of the play and why the play is important to life today.
Shakespeare wrote King Lear in 1605 or 1606 when he was already a successful playwright. It is one of his many tragedies, although it includes some differences. Nevertheless, following a classical model, the fifth act is used to bring a conclusion to the play, thus the audience expects the events to be wound up, with justice done and right restored. According to Aristotle, the Greek philosopher, a tragedy should arouse emotions of pity and fear; King Lear can be put in parallel to these thoughts.
In King Lear, the subplot of Gloucester corresponds to the major plot of King Lear. Both fathers have their own loyal legitimate child and their evil and disloyal child. They are both honourable men, who have children that return to them in their time of need. Gloucester and Lear are both tormented, and their favoured child recovers their life. In the early beginning of the play, Cordelia says that her love for her father is the love between father and daughter, no more, no less. Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave My heart into my mouth. I love your Majesty According to my bond, no more nor less. (Act 1 Scene 1 Pg. 13 lines 93-95) In response, King Lear goes into rage, and divides Cordelia’s share of the kingdom between her two unworthy sisters. Such injustice is encountered by Gloucester in the subplot. O villain, villain! His very opinion in the letter! Abhorred villain! Unnatural, detested, brutish villain! Worse than brutish! Go, sirrah, seek him. I’ll apprehend him. Abominable villain! Where is he? (Act 1 Scene 2 Pg. 37 lines 75-78) Gloucester fool...
Muir, Kenneth. "Great Tragedies I: King Lear." Shakespeare's Sources. London: Methuen & Co Ltd, 1957.
Despite its undeniable greatness, throughout the last four centuries King Lear has left audiences, readers and critics alike emotionally exhausted and mentally unsatisfied by its conclusion. Shakespeare seems to have created a world too cruel and unmerciful to be true to life and too filled with horror and unrelieved suffering to be true to the art of tragedy. These divergent impressions arise from the fact that of all Shakespeare's works, King Lear expresses human existence in its most universal aspect and in its profoundest depths. A psychological analysis of the characters such as Bradley undertook cannot by itself resolve or place in proper perspective all the elements which contribute to these impressions because there is much here beyond the normal scope of psychology and the conscious or unconscious motivations in men.
The quaint play of King Lear by William Shakespeare explores a plot containing a vast amount of characters all with their own unique personalities, which is what makes it so compelling to examine the Psychological aspects of established characters actions. The prominent character of this poem, which the poem is named after, King Lear is a dynamic character that has characteristics that give an insight to what goes on in his head. The most particular action King Lear takes is when explains his reason as to why he has so many knights surrounding him is because as he says even “basest beggars are in the poorest thing superfluous.” to compare his entourage similar to the needles items that everyone has (II.IV.255-256). What is interesting about what King Lear says is that what he must have are knights around him a commodity that is gifted those of high stature which he no longer has since he gave it away but why he thinks he still needs them is that he believes
Shakespeare's good characters, in the play King Lear, are considered good because they are loyal even when they are disguised from or unrecognizable by those to whom they owe loyalty. In addition, their loyalty does not waver even when they are banished or mistreated by those to whom they are loyal. Cordelia, Edgar and Kent are all characters that exemplify this goodness and unwavering loyalty.
King Lear as a Tragedy Caused by Arrogance, Rash Decisions and Poor Judgement of Character
Tragedies are dominated by contrasts and conflicts between various entities such as, good and evil, legitimate and illegitimate, appearance and reality and so on. Another contrast is between wisdom and foolishness. If one associates foolishness with madmen and fools one will be surprised to find that in a tragedy such as King Lear this is not the case. Shakespeare portrays, the sane characters such as Kent and Cordelia as fools by virtue of loyalty, love and their willingness to speak the truth. On the otherhand, the Madman, Tom o’Bedlam and the fool are depicted as the true figures of wisdom. Moreover mirroring all this is King Lear’s transition from foolish behaviour through madness achieving wisdom.
... example of what is right and to show how powerful duty is. Without Kent the play would take a completely different course. He is able to connect the King's madness with the loss of reason that Lear displays in the first scene. Kent is a representative of Lear before he lost his power.
Bradley, A.C. “King Lear.” Shakespearian Tragedy. Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Macbeth. Macmillan and Co., London, 1919. Project Gutenberg. Web. 26 Apr. 2015.
Lear is a noble man because he comes from a royal family and that is the first quality that shows that Lear is a tragic hero. Throughout Lear’s life, everything has been done for him because he is the King and back in the 8th century B.C. all of the people of the country had to meet all the demands of the King. His nobility can be seen when Kent says, “Royal Lear, Whom I have honored as my king, Loved as my father, as my master followed, As my great patron thought on in my prayers,” (Shakespeare I, I, 141-144) Kent is ...