Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy of genetic testing
Arguments for and against genetic testing
Arguments for and against genetic testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy of genetic testing
Genetic testing negatively affects millions of lives. For example, negative test results may trigger awful emotions. To tell the truth testing may cost too much for the average person. Additionally, these screenings are not full body reviews. However, considering these genetic test affects, these should be prohibited by agencies offering the tests for everyone’s life. The results of a genetic test may trigger some horrible emotions. Although finding out that a gene mutation is absent may cause them to feel a sense of relief. Regardless though finding out that you have a genetic disorder results in a displeasured feeling. Considering this some may feel the urge “playing it safe” (Timmermans, July 19, 2013), not doing what they want, but worrying about what could happen. For example, depression could be shown and might make someone feel like they need to “opt …show more content…
At this moment it is too expensive for the majority of people. Also, negative results will negatively affect emotions in a negative way causing depression. Thereupon, those tests will not tell you everything, so there may be a second mutation that may not be acknowledged, so the person taking the test would never know about that mutation unless paying for another test. All in all these negative inputs put in perspective the horrible effects of genetic screenings. It proves the point more and more that genetic screenings should be prohibited. In every person's life genetic test should be prohibited. Foremost, emotions may be triggered from negative test results, that would say what disease or disorder that person has. Secondly, the cost of these tests is way to high for the average person. Thirdly, these tests also do not give full insight on all of the genetic disorders as well as diseases. Now, action needs to be taken to shut down these horrible agencies that offer genetic
Studies to make the process quicker and cleaner are under development.... ... middle of paper ... ... Insurance providers and other holders of genetic information should be prohibited from releasing genetic information (Hudson, 1998). Guidelines like these need to be formed into a federal law that people can pass in one way or another so that we can be protected from the various forms of discrimination that is possible with this kind of information.
Teutch, S., & Tuckson, R. Department of Health & Human Services, (2008). U.S. system of oversight of genetic testing: A response to the charge of the secretary of health and human services. Retrieved from website: http://osp.od.nih.gov/sites/default/files/SACGHS_oversight_report.pdf
The history of harmful eugenic practices, spurring from the Nazi implementations of discrimination towards biologically inferior people has given eugenics a negative stigma (1,Kitcher, 190). Genetic testing, as Kitcher sees it through a minimalistic perspective, should be restrained to aiding future children with extremely low qualities of life (2,Kitcher, 190). He believes that genetic engineering should only be used to avoid disease and illness serving the role of creating a healthier human race. He promotes laissez-faire eugenics, a “hands off” concept that corresponds to three components of eugenic practice, discrimination, coercion and division of traits. It holds the underlying works of genetic testing, accurate information, open access, and freedom of choice. Laissez-faire eugenics promises to enhance reproductive freedom preventing early child death due to genetic disease (3,Kitcher, 198). However there are dangers in Laissez-faire that Kitcher wants to avoid. The first is the historical tendency of population control, eugenics can go from avoiding suffering, to catering to a set of social values that will cause the practice of genetics to become prejudiced, insensitive and superficial. The second is that prenatal testing will become limited to the upper class, leaving the lower class with fewer options, creating biologically driven social barriers. Furthermore the decay of disability support systems due to prenatal testing can lead to an increased pressure to eliminate those unfit for society (4,Kitcher, 214).
It is important that every genetic test must be validated before can be used, must be ap-proved and certified by the regulatory bodies as FDA.
First, let's consider the situations in which genetic testing would be beneficial to patients. Genetic testing for diseases that are preventable or treatable could allow individuals to alter their lifestyles so as to treat the disease or reduce their risk of developing the disease. For instance, the E2 version of the APOE gene, which is found on chromosome 19, has been linked to heart disease (Ridley, 1999). Individuals who have two copies of the E2 gene are particularly sensitive to high-fat and high-cholesterol diets. Therefore, a genetic test to determine whether a person has the high-risk version of the APOE gene could inform a person of future health risks, thereby allowing the person to change his diet to help prev...
Prenatal genetic testing has become one of the largest and most influencial advances in clinical genetics today. "Of the over 4000 genetic traits which have been distinguished to date, more than 300 are identifiable via prenatal genetic testing" (Morris, 1993). Every year, thousands of couples are subjecting their lives to the results of prenatal tests. For some, the information may be a sigh of relief, for others a tear of terror. The psychological effects following a prenatal test can be devastating, leaving the woman with a decision which will affect the rest of her life.
As the medical field expands, it is nearly destroying every moral thing we stand for. We need to find the moral line and stand our ground. Prenatal genetic testing is a complicated topic for several families. This procedure is arranged in order to predict the health of
Genetic testing, also known as screening, is a rapidly advancing new scientific field that can potentially revolutionize not only the world of medicine, but many aspects of our lives. Genetic screening is the sequencing of human DNA in order to discover genetic differences, anomalies, or mutations that may prove pathological. As genetic screening becomes more advanced and easily accessible, it presents society with difficult questions that must be asked about the boundaries of science and to what degree we are allowed to tamper with the human genome. To better understand the potential impact of genetic screening on our society, we must examine the potential benefits in comparison to the possible negative impact it may cause. With this knowledge in hand, we can examine what the future holds for this field of study and the best possible direction to take.
First of all, I want to start by saying that I 'm not discriminating the disabled community, but this is a very large number that could possibly be diminished with the help of genetic testing. (1) I believe that there is nothing wrong with testing the genes of an unborn child to possibly determine if it could develop a genetic disorder in the future. One of the advantages that genetic testing provides is that the parents could now be informed of the situation, and keep track of their unborn child 's health. I 'm sure those parents are pleased with this technology, and the chances to be able to keep track of their baby. This a baby, and is something very precious, and valuable, and I believe that parents want to keep track of anything that may happen with the unborn child. I 'm sure that a large amount of people would agree would agree that they don 't want to suddenly take the hard hit. When the news is presented in the delivery room. This serves more as an advantage than a disadvantage, due to the fact parents. Pull be more prepared, or possibly have the option to abort it. This is a right that the parents should have regardless of the opposing side arguments towards it. Im a hundred percent sure that the opposing side has very strong arguments towards genetics testing, and one of the main ones is "playing God." The opposing side believed that some things in
Genetic testing before or during pregnancy is something that I strongly agree with and is something I suggest everyone should do. Genetic testing is taking that extra precaution before or during birth. By performing this type of testing before/during getting pregnant it can catch certain disorders you might have. These tests show whether you have an increase or decrease change of having a child with genetic abnormality. I personally would get these types of testing to give me the extra reassurance for a healthy baby. I feel that many things can go wrong during birth and consider that everyone gets genetic testing before thinking about having kids. These genetics tests are to help us through the process of birth. You can perform genetic testing
Genetics Essay How have genetics affected our lives? From your physical appearance, to the pets you play with, we are gonna take a look at how genetics have changed our lives. First we’re going to take a look at how genes create you. Then i am going to talk about how mutations in genes can affect us.
Genetic testing negatively affects MILLIONS of lives. Those test results may trigger awful emotions. Testing may cost too much for the average person. Also, these screenings are not full body reviews. Considering these genetic testing should be prohibited by agencies offering the tests for everyone’s life.
Genetic Testing is a very helpful and useful tool for the world today. There and many pros and many cons to each test. In this paper the discussion is the pros and cons of preimplantation testing, newborn screening, and breast cancer genetic testing. Many different tests are used today ranging from before conception of a fetus all the way to adulthood and that is how much medicine had developed over the last few hundred years. Most people think these test are miracles and gifts however there are some people that disagree entirely with the whole concept of messing with the fate of each person. Preimplantation, newborn screening, and breast cancer testing all have pros consist of the helpful ways to stop things from happening in the future. However
I believe genetic screening should be illegal. However, people should be able to choose the sex their baby. Many families are using genetic screening to balance the number of boys and girls in their families. Families’ should take genetic testing at their own risks because the tests don't always offer consistent results. The government needs to ensure that genetic tests provide useful medical information and that the test results are reliable.
Genetic testing on children is a very controversial discussion with parents. Some parents do not think that it is appropriate to test children because their kids are not the ones making the decisions for them the parent is. Well others like me feel that genetic testing should be done for our children. I think is should be done because if there is cancer or some other kind of hereditary disease or disorder on either side of the family you can try to prevent it from happening before it become severe or even happens. A couple of examples are, one of my friends grandchild went to the hospital and was not feeling very well turns out that he had cancer and it was out of the blue because no one had cancer of that type. Maybe if they had tested