How Accurate Is Wikipedia Inaccurate?

216 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why is Wikipedia not reliable

In today’s society information is everywhere. We have libraries, but we also have online resources. Information can be obtained from almost everywhere today, but how accurate are these websites in giving us actual facts and not just beliefs or people’s opinions. One of the most popular resources that we use to gather information is the famous Wikipedia. Type anything in any web search engine and you will most likely get results from Wikipedia. But is Wikipedia accurate? If we look at the websites URL, we can see that it’s a nonprofit organization, and a vast majority of people contribute, so there is no author, email, or phone number, or any way to contact. To verify how accurate all the information is. Putting Wikipedia to the test

Show More
Related

  • The Wikipedia Game: Boring, Pointless, Or Neither By Seanan Kamperman

    254 Words  | 1 Pages

    Sean Kamperman the author of “The Wikipedia Game: Boring, Pointless, or Neither” believes that wikipedia can be helpful with educational learning purposes. Wikipedia is known for plagiarism and fake information. People make Wikipedia have a bad reputation in schools especially in english classes. Wikipedia can be a source of entertainment and self improvement for some people. Some people might just research stuff on Wikipedia to find interesting articles. In “Wikihunt” many Wikipedia users have “discovered” a game of their own, this involves creativity so it brings out the creative qualities of people. Wikipedia is a educational game and it's also free it's convenient for people. The game “Wikihunt” involves two people in separate computers

    Read More

  • Is Google Making Us Stupid?, by Nicholas Carr

    1419 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the rise of technology and the staggering availability of information, the digital age has come about in full force, and will only grow from here. Any individual with an internet connection has a vast amount of knowledge at his fingertips. As long as one is online, he is mere clicks away from Wikipedia or Google, which allows him to find what he needs to know. Despite this, Nicholas Carr questions whether Google has a positive impact on the way people take in information. In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr explores the internet’s impact on the way people read. He argues that the availability of so much information has diminished the ability to concentrate on reading, referencing stories of literary types who no longer have the capacity to sit down and read a book, as well as his own personal experiences with this issue. The internet presents tons of data at once, and it is Carr’s assumption that our brains will slowly become wired to better receive this information.

    Read More

  • Leonardo Scenario's Use Of Wikipedia

    314 Words  | 1 Pages

    Wikipedia, a crowdsourced online encyclopedia, is extremely beneficial to people who want facts, not opinions, on a wide range of topics. Occasionally, a volunteer editor will insert his or her opinion while creating or editing a page, as was the case with Leonardo DiCaprio's Wikipedia page when someone edited the page and wrote "FINALLY HAS A GODD***ED OSCAR" repeatedly, spoiling the actor's Wikipedia page. While Leonardo DiCaprio did finally win an Oscar for his work, the edit clearly shows bias, violating Wikipedia's regulations. Public figures, including politicians, authors and entrepreneurs, should have a Wikipedia page so that when people are looking for factual information, it is easy to find. A person needn't be as famous as Leonardo

    Read More

  • Wikipedia's False Information

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Wikipedia recognizes that it would not be wise for someone to use this virtual encyclopedia as a source for any educational use or just wanting some information (“Not Authoritative” n.d.). Those who put in false information are more likely to be anonymous and because they are anonymous it causes complication for Wikipedia. Wikipedia have set rules for the users to “follow”, but those rules are obviously ignored, which results Wikipedia not having total control nor organization with the users. For example, if someone chose to do a research paper and chose an article from Wikipedia that has

    Read More

  • Wikipedia Friend Not Foe Summary

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Darren Crovitz and W.Scott Smoot, authors of the article “Wikipedia Friend, Not Foe”, “Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity about writing for a real audience, meeting genre expectations, establishing credibility, revising for clarity and purpose, and entering public discussions about the nature of truth, accuracy, and neutrality”(www.ncte.org). Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that provides information on almost any topic. Understanding the various advantages that Wikipedia provides users with, makes it easy to see why so many seek to gain knowledge here. Even though Wikipedia has some drawbacks, students should be able to use Wikipedia because it is a revolutionary way to educate and inform students.

    Read More

  • Wikipedia's Coverage Of Wikipedia

    271 Words  | 1 Pages

    As one of the first places people turn to for information, Wikipedia is lacking articles about topics ranging from indigenous peoples to black history. Volunteer editors, primarily males in high-income countries with access to high speed Internet connections, create pages about people and events that are familiar to them, leaving gaps in coverage. To fill in the gaps, the Wikipedia foundation sponsors edit-a-thons; this past October was the Indigenous Peoples' Day edit-a-thon. During the San Diego, California event, volunteers from the United States, Canada and Mexico created pages about notable Native Americans, tribes and Indigenous historical figures to expand Wikipedia's coverage of disenfranchised peoples.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Wikipedia

    767 Words  | 2 Pages

    What most people do not seem to understand is that "Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by the people who use it."(add source) There are thousands of people around the world who are either making a new page, rewriting or correcting information, or adding information at any given time during the day.

    Read More

  • Internet Research Study Research Topic: Creole Lousiana

    1753 Words  | 4 Pages

    The internet is a powerful tool for information. In a matter of seconds, it can yield millions of hits that contain inestimable amounts of knowledge and opinion. No longer is the library the epitome of data. The internet surpasses all in ease of access, speed, and amount of data. However, not all websites are useful or reliable in procuring data. Littered through cyberspace there are a few superb sites for gathering information, yet many are complete trash. Recently there was a paper researched on the Creole People of Louisiana For the purpose of this study, the first five non-Wikipedia links were critiqued using only the search item term “Creole Louisiana.”

    Read More

  • Accuracy Of Wikipedia Essay

    898 Words  | 2 Pages

    Online resources have become extremely remarkable for college students because they can easily have access to these sources without difficulty. However, some of these websites and resources can be inappropriate, for academic studies require reliable resources in order to get reasonable and accurate data. One of these inappropriate websites is Wikipedia because people cannot trust information, essays, and articles that were written by unknown authors. For academic writing, students must have accurate information about authors and their studies in order to use those articles. They cannot provide an acceptable academic paper if they use non-academic recourses such as Wikipedia and other blogs on the Internet. Even though some think that college students can use Wikipedia as an accurate resource, I believe that they should use other websites and resources that are more accurate and trustworthy than

    Read More

  • Wikipedi Wikipedia

    637 Words  | 2 Pages

    With the internet being part of our everyday life information can be accessed from almost any corner of the world. Whether it’s used for playing games, communicating with friends, or even just streaming movies, the internet is intertwined with essentially everyone on the planet in some sort of fashion. With the abundance of articles and information that is easily attainable in today’s society problems occur when the information is incorrect or not justified. Wikipedia is taking the majority of the heat and is frequently called an unreliable source. Because of the easy read and quick basic overview, Wikipedia is a go to source for students as well as teachers and is a helpful tool to get minimal information. However Wikipedia should not be used as research tool on academic papers because of its lacking credentials.

    Read More

  • r

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    When people write essays or need information they intend to search up multiple websites to get the answers. Google is the most famous search engine that people use and now google is recommending using Wikipedia. Wikipedia is also the best and the most resourceful website where millions of people use. Wikipedia benefits people by helping them on their topic.

    Read More

  • dave

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wikipedia was launched on 15 January 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, the site was designed to complement Nupedia, an online encyclopedia designed to be edited by experts (this information was sited from Wikipedia due to the lack of information available on Nupedia). This sounds like it would be a good source then if it is complementing information from a site that is edited only by experts, unfortunately if you tried to go to Nupedia.com you will be meet by a slow connection or a timeout. I was able to get to the site once and was not meet with limited information, so Wikipedia took over and began to grow. I will tell you there are good things about Wikipedia, it is a great site to get an understanding of information, some instructors may advise their students to read entries for scientific concepts on Wikipedia as a way to begin understanding those concepts (Harvard College Writing Program, 2014). After some of my research most sites do encourage Wikipedia as a starting point but to be careful due to the fac...

    Read More

  • Wikipedia

    1371 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger created Wikipedia in 2001 in order to give people the ability to either obtain or put out quick, understandable information about any sort of topic, ranging from J.R.R. Tolkien’s fictional Middle Earth to the current conflict in Iraq. According to Capocci’s study on Wikipedia growth, Wikipedia’s total amount of articles has more than sextupled (around seven-million total) and the amount of views per day has more than quintupled in the past five years, making it one of the fastest growing and most commonly visited websites on the internet (par. 1). In agreement with Meier, the point that Wikipedia allows anyone to use its information for absolutely no charge or requirement of registration led to it becoming the 6th most visited website in 2009 (1). Also, the research in the Zotero Report on research citations showed how the amount of internal citations for Wikipedia at the least doubles almost every year since 2002 (Spiro 1). In line with this, citations for Wikipedia now outnumber many accepted ...

    Read More

  • Wikipedia: A Reliable Source for Information?

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    In March 2000 Wikipedia started out as Nupedia.com with a review board of experts. By 2001 less than twenty-four articles were completed. It was then that the creator, Jimmy Wales, and his editor-in-chief, Larry Sanger, decided to make Wikipedia. They created it as an open-source encyclopedia that permitted anyone to create and edit its content. This freedom allowed Wikipedia to grow at an exponential rate. In 2006 there were approximately one million articles and by 2007 it had grown to over two million (“Wikipedia”). When compared to other online encyclopedias such as Britannica.com it surpasses in every way except that people are fallible and sometimes the information is not 100% accurate. On Britannica the free features are limited and there are ads throughout the web-page but for a certain amount of money per year a user can access the full benefits of the site. Wikipedia is completely free with no copyrights, allowing access in several languages and from anywhere in the world with no ads to be found. Due to the way Wikipedia was originally designed users are permitted to print, copy, and pass out the information they gather. Unlike if a distinct number of words are used from any of Richard Hofstadter's works a check must be sent to him to avoid penalties for plagiarism (Rosenzweig 117-46). The...

    Read More

  • History of Programming Languages

    1280 Words  | 3 Pages

    To conduct my research, I used various search engines for Internet sources as well as read various textbooks. I mostly consulted with resources that are from an educational website or university. This assisted my research as to provide accurate and reliable information for me to use, as the Internet has been known to wrongly provide false knowledge. From this, I learned to cross-reference the websites that I use to ensure the dependability of it across multiple sources. This method proved to be effective in my opinion, as it proved a website to be valid by checking the information found on other websites. However, I have also realized that this method is not always fool-proof or fail-safe. And so, I examined the government and national archives to find my primary sources of statistics and first-hand accounts.

    Read More

More about How Accurate Is Wikipedia Inaccurate?

Open Document