Heros In Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime And Punishment

743 Words2 Pages

Humans Vs. Heros The word “hero” is simple in connotation but complex in the feeling it evokes. The Oxford dictionary defines a hero as, “A person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.” This statement can be interpreted in many ways and thus creating a multitude of heros but heros that all share the same essential qualities, albeit in different manners. In Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment, the protagonist Raskolnikov is depicted as a "Code" or Hemingway hero (Crime and Punishment). A proportional hero from a different literary classic would be Winston Smith in George Orwell’s 1984 (1984). In this story, Winston displays characteristics of a modern hero through both …show more content…

This hero is often brave but maintains a sense of comedic relief. This character also remains calm and keeps his bearings in high pressure situations. In Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov fits this role perfectly. Although Rask has shown that in some tense positions he has been seen fainting or maybe showing a slight sense of error, it is always done strategically. Rask often battles himself, but to the outside world he is displayed as witty and cunning. Various situations arise that involve Raskolnikov using satire to cleverly maneuver through sticky situations. This is especially shown when Portify Petrovitch brings Raskolnikov in for questioning, and the scenes that follow immediately after. The man that was the supposed surprise for Raskolnikov proceeds to Raskolnikov’s room and apologizes. Raskolnikov ends Part Four by uttering, “It all cuts both ways, now it all cuts both ways.” followed by the narration of “and now he went out more confident than ever.” (311). Here, Raskolnikov exhibits his control of the …show more content…

Winston is shown to be a modern hero, defined as an normal, everyday man with a sense of defiance. Even though a modern hero is trying to defy all odds by displaying his abilities, he is often caught up in human emotions. His weaknesses are shown and more than likely taken advantage of in the novel. In 1984, Winston is an average, outer party citizen with ambition to change his dystopian society. Fear is an emotion that often haunts Winston, but Winston also gets caught in a sense of complacency. Complacency and content are a major problem in the nonfictional world’s society and is put to the test by Winston as he settles in and gets comfortable in the attic of a storeroom. This flaw of Winston’s turns out to become fatal as he is found out for his crimes and thrown into a jail and eventually killed by the thought police after a transformation by the party and a brainwashing activity that lasts years and forced Winston into loving Big Brother. The struggle of love is also infused into Winston as he vows never to betray his true love, Julia. As Winston is being tortured, he gives Julia up for all of her crimes, but this isn’t the endgame for O’Brien, as O’Brien wants Winston to stop loving Julia. This all comes to a head as Winston’s love is broken at the prospect of Winston facing his largest

Open Document