Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Case study on gender inequality at workplace
Gender discrimination against women in the workplace
Gender discrimination against women in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Case study on gender inequality at workplace
Case Name, Citation, and Court: Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 114 S.Ct 367, 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993) United States Supreme Court Summary of the Key Facts: The petitioner Harris suede Forklift Systems, Inc and claiming the conduct of sexual harassment from the Forklift's president which create " abusive work environment." Ms. Harris believe which was the violation of Title VII of the Civil Right Act of 1964 because the harassment that she experienced was based on gender. Mr. Hardy, the president of Forklift Systems, Inc, told sexually and professionally inappropriate comments and statements in front of other employees on several occasions. Ms. Harris complained to Mr. Hardy about his conduct before, but Mr. Hardy responds that he was only joking, and he apologized for his actions. Also, Mr. Hardy promised that he world stop, and base on his promise Ms. Harris stayed on the job. However, a few months later Mr. Hardy began his arrestments again as he did before. …show more content…
Hardy's conduct may offended the individual but it's not enough to create abusive work environment. Ms. Harris doesn’t suffer any physical injury and it's hard to assume her psychological wellbeing. Also, District Court of Middle District of Tennessee Adopted the Magistrate court result and found this case as a close case because they believe the facts are not enough to lead to abusive work environment. They also make this decision by following precedent circuit case, Rabidue v. Osceola Refining
Central Garage, Inc. It was a challenging opinion to read since this case is old and, at that time, no Florida court had addressed the precise issue presented. The facts of the case are that Central Garage DBA Gulfcoast is a corporation that performs installations, repair and maintenance of auto air conditioners and auto accessories. On the other side, Hapney worked in many auto repair shops in the Tampa area where he learned to install and repair auto air conditioning systems. In 1988, he started working for Gulfcoast, where he entered into a non-compete agreement. The agreement stated the following: “I further agree that for a period of three years following the termination of my employment I will not offer, as an agent, employee, owner, or distributor, similar products or services on behalf of a competitor of the Company on the west coast of Florida from Crystal River to Naples or inland 100 miles.” A year after working with Gulfcoast, Hapney willingly ended his employment with Gulfcoast and a month later, Gulfcoast filed a lawsuit to enforce the covenant not to compete in where the trial court granted an injunction. As stated earlier, at the time of the case, there wasn’t many decisions in which the judge can cite and base his decision on. The judge for this case had to look for cases in other states to get an idea of cases with a similar issue, which makes it a tough case to decide on. Some of the issues that the appellate court focused on is that Hapney did not receive significant training on installing and repairing automobile air conditioning systems, he had no significant contacts with Gulfcoast’s customers, and he did not acquire trade secrets from Gulfcoast. These were three issues that were heavily discussed on the opinion and it amazes the kind of detail that they were covered with. The
Schlafly, Phyllis. “‘Equal rights’ for women: wrong then, wrong now.” Los Angeles Times, April 8, 2007. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-schafly8apr08,0,6143259.story.
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964." ():-. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm on Mar 17, 2014
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has grown over the past few decades to ensure that employees, as well as employers, are protected against all employment discrimination. It is extremely important that both employers and employees know and understand what the law means and how to handle such acts of discrimination. As more amendments are passed into law, employers need to have clear and concise policies to help fight against discrimination.
It is likely Ms. Saxon has a cause of action for sexual harassment. The sex-based remarks directed at her, as well as her employer’s failure to rectify the situation after Ms. Saxon approached the foreman, probably constitute unlawful employment practices.
On August 8, the Federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed. The court ruled that the Piscataway, N.J. Board of Education violated the Civil Rights Act when it fired Sharon Taxman, an "overrepresented" Jewish female school teacher, to make room for a black woman under the school system's affirmative action plan. The school district was ordered by the court to pay $144,000 in back pay. The judges' decision was based on their own investigation into the legislative history of Title VII ...
For instance, a representative's unmistakable occupation conditions are influenced when a sexually antagonistic workplace results in her helpful release. Additionally, a boss who makes sexual advances toward a subordinate representative may convey a certain threat to unfavorably influence her employment status in the event that she doesn't go along. Hostile environment badgering may procure qualities of "quid pro quo" harassment if the culpable boss misuses his power over job choices to compel the casualty to persevere or take part in the sexual behavior. Sexual harassment may finish in a retaliatory release if a victim tells the harasser or her employer she will no more submit to the badgering, and is then terminated in striking back for this challenge. “To guarantee a work environment free from inappropriate behavior, associations can take after some essential steps. Initially, the association can build up a strategy proclamation making it clear that sexual harassment won't go on without serious consequences in the working environment. Second, all employees, new and old, can be prepared to distinguish improper working environment conduct. What's more, the association can add to a component for reporting sexual harassment in a manner that urges individuals to stand up. Finally, administration can get ready to act quickly to teach the individuals who take part in sexual harassment, and also to secure the victims of inappropriate behavior (Noe,
In the 10 years Mazey had been employed with Hudson, he was observed throwing things which barely missed employees, yelling at subordinates “in a rage” and making “derogatory and demeaning remarks” possibly regarding ethnicity or origin, among other inappropriate behavior (Yemen & Clawson, 2007). Mazey can be considered as a workplace bully. Hocker and Wilmot (2011) define bullying as “repeated and persistent patterns of negative workplace behavior that is ongoing for six months or longer in duration” (p. 175). The excessive bullying behavior Mazey displayed created interpersonal tension that affected productivity. Hudson associates were hesitant, or refused to work with Mazey due to prior...
In 1964, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act to end racial discrimination in employment, institutions like hospitals and schools, and privately owned public accommodations In 1965, congress returned suffrage to black southerners, by passing the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (Foner 926). In the case of Loving v. Virginia (1967), the Supreme Court ruled that laws prohibiting interracial marriage were unconstitutional (Foner 951). Because of the civil rights movement in the sixties, minorities gained more rights than they had prior to the 1960s. While the 1960s were a time of advancement for minorities, it was also a time of advancement for women. In 1963, Congress passed the Equal Pay Act, which outlawed discrimination in the workplace based on a person’s gender (Foner 944).
In 1991, Anita Hill was thrust into the national spotlight by bringing the accusation of sexual harassment to the forefront. While Hill was working for the US Department of Education and the Equal Opportunity Commission, she accused the chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, known as the EEOC, and the nominee for the vacant chair on the US Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, of sexual harassment ten years prior. Even though the Federal Bureau of Investigation, also known as the FBI, investigated the accusation, nothing conclusive ever came of it. During Thomas’ confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court seat, Anita Hill had spoken up about the harassment, which was leaked to the media, the Senate Judiciary Committee had no choice but to investigate these accusations. Even though Thomas’ nomination was eventually confirmed after the hearing was concluded, Anita Hill brought this sensitive issue to the forefront and gave other women the courage to speak up about harassment in the workplace.
Victims of sexual harassment are able to sue under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 whic...
Williams, W. W. (2013). Ruth Bader Ginsburg's equal protection clause: 1970-80. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 41.
This willingness to overlook bullying behaviors is demonstrative of weak management, not only because it fails to adhere to ethical standards, but it is wrongheaded in its assumption that the net sum is a positive for the organization because it fails to make a proper accounting of the seen and unseen costs of bullying in the workplace. It also fails to account for bullying behavior as a contagion, wherein a “civility vacuum” is created (Sutton 2007, 95) because cooperation between employees breaks down, and everyone is out to protect themselves and their positions. According to Sutton, a hospital worker study conducted by Dr. Michelle Duffy on the effects of “morally disengaged” bosses on their workers found that after 6 months, many of the workers demonstrated many of the same traits as their hostile bosses: teasing, put-downs, and coldness (2007,
Winslow, Barbara. "The Historians Perspective of Title IX." The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. 25 Mar. 2012. .
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against applicants and employees because of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Religious Discrimination as part of the Civil Rights Act is the subject of this term paper.