Global Warming Persuasive Essay

1571 Words4 Pages

Global warming is not a big deal what's so ever. Too many average people are freaking out over nothing. We should all just leave it to the more experienced political leaders and scientists. It’s not like everyday people can make an impact on the environment. All these nations are trying to work together, when in reality it’s causing more arguments. Why not just leave the earth to warm up? We will all be dead before anything extreme happens anyway. Right now the oceans are bringing in more water, coral reefs are dying, and the air is getting foggier. Why don’t we look at the bright side of these things happening? Everyone is focusing on the negatives. For example now the fish will have more room to swim and we will have more places to ride boats …show more content…

We all did what we had to do for survival, no matter what we hurt. And that’s what we should do in today's world. We all need to take a lesson from the past and care for us again. A surge in sea levels in the coming decades will continue a trend that began around 1950 ( Seas `could rise by more than…). So? Has any normal person actually noticed this? Because I know I haven't. It’s really only the scientist. 2014 was the hottest year ever recorded till 2015 snatched the crown-till 2016 obliterated the record (Global warming: this is…). Can we really blame global warming for this? Or CO2 emissions? Last Summer featured some of the hottest days ever reliably recorded on this planet (Global warming: this is…). From what I remember the Summer is supposed to be hot. It’s not like we can really trust these scientist. They just want their “research” in magazines and newspapers and to cause unneeded argument. They just want to be the cause to something. The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the IPCC notes, has shot up by 40 percent since 1750, with concentrations of the gas now increasing at a faster rate than at any time in the last 22,000 years (A warming warning).Okay first off in 1750 was there any good record keeping that we can actually trust to say this? No there isn't. In 1750 they did not have any high enough technological advances to actually test the air for carbon. In 1750 they didn’t even have the cotton gin yet. And had only first found evidence of

Open Document