Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of TV in American politics
Role of TV in American politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of TV in American politics
Politics and rhetoric of George Wallace influenced later conservative leaders such as Richard Nixon, Ronald Regan, Bill Clinton and George Bush. All in which modified his political toolbox, knowns as the Southern Strategy, for example creating wedge issue in polarization, accommodating the public’s emotion and most importantly using technology to their advantage in communicating to the public. Though the utilization of the silent majority, new technology, and the southern strategy were effective, they were not appropriate. I will describe the powerful tactics taken from Wallace’s toolbox and how the presidents effected the use of political campaign to their discretion.
The views of television all started when George Wallace stood as a “traffic
…show more content…
Richard Nixon used technology in his campaign which put him way ahead of the lead by doing polls in which helped identify what and why the citizens of America were mad and what they would like to happen in regards of change. These polls were carried out by Princeton’s Opinion Research Corporation. “Nixon’s men know the tools of their trade. Television would allow minimum uncontrolled exposure of the candidate and an opportunity for maximum manipulation of the electorate” (page 25). One of Nixon’s media advisors told him before his nomination “Voters are basically lazy, basically uninterested in making an effort to understand what we’re talking about… Reason requires a high degree of discipline, of concentration… The emotions are more easily roused, closer to the surface, more malleable… It’s the aura that surrounds the charismatic figure more than it is the figure itself that draws followers. Our task is to build that aura” (page 25). Nixon used this information to fight for and gain information about what emotional unstable the public so that through his campaign could accommodate their feelings. He wanted to make his audience feel like he was one of them and in turn, would represent them and their values when elected. Television …show more content…
The technology and his acting career helped him present himself as the character his campaign wanted him to be perceived as the white republican leader. “He had learned to ‘sell himself’ effortlessly as a man for all times… He is the ideal past, the successful present, the hopeful future all in one. He is conceiving because he has ‘been there’ – been almost everywhere in our modern American culture – yet he ‘has no past’… He had made pretending the easiest thing we do” (page 68). Television was used and always made Ronald Raegan look so much more appealing than anyone he was against. Therefore, using this to his advantage he flipped the table whenever he talked about his ideas on how great the people of America could be. What they, the public, could do and what he mostly likely wanted them to do to gain more support. He repealed the Rumford Act which “Prohibited an owner from offering property for sale or rent and then withdrawing it for religious reasons” (page 55). By doing this he created a wedge between the whites who believed that their freedom of property rights were being taken away. Then later taking a straight quote from Wallace’s campaign speech and saying “You
As the election campaign began in earnest, Ford did very little campaigning himself but instead depended on powerful political figures such as President Woodrow Wilson and many Michigan newspapers to relay his political platform to the public. Ford’s populari...
Throughout the course of American political history rarely has there ever been a rivalry as fierce and contested as that of the one between Tennessee’s Andrew Jackson, and Kentucky’s Henry Clay. During their extensive political careers the two constantly seemed to cross paths differing in terms philosophically and ideologically. Simply put, these two men profoundly shaped the American Antebellum period, specifically involving the 1820’s to the 1840’s. Their notions of what was best for the country became the basis for their respective parties and consequently their differences in methodology facilitated countless battles in the American political atmosphere. The most significant issues that centered on these types of political skirmishes involved
In today’s society, one of the most natural human traits is selfishness. David Foster Wallace incorporated this idea in his commencement speech at Kenyon College in 2005. Wallace aims to persuade his audience that, “the most obvious, ubiquitous, important realities are often the ones that are the hardest to see and talk about.” Although the intended audience of his speech is the graduates and staff, along with their friends and family, the piece has become quite popular since its delivery. Wallace offers, “nothing less than the truth” and captivates the listeners with his complete honestly. His personal tone lets the audience feel like they are a part of the conversation, rather than just receiving it. Wallace successfully conveys his message that society is blind to the world around them through the use of logic, humility and emotional appeals.
Looking at the United States in 1965, it would seem that the future of the liberal consensus was well entrenched. The anti-war movement was in full swing, civil rights were moving forward, and Johnson's Great Society was working to alleviate the plight of the poor in America. Yet, by 1968 the liberal consensus had fallen apart, which led to the triumph of conservatism with the election of President Reagan in 1980. The question must be posed, how in the course of 15 years did liberal consensus fall apart and conservatism rise to the forefront? What were the decisive factors that caused the fracturing of what seemed to be such a powerful political force? In looking at the period from 1968 to the triumph of Reagan in 1980, America was shaken to the core by the Watergate scandal, the stalling of economic growth, gas shortages, and the Vietnam War. In an era that included the amount of turbulence that the 1970's did, it is not difficult to imagine that conservatism come to power. In this paper I will analyze how the liberal consensus went from one of its high points in 1965 to one of its lows in 1968. From there I will show how conservatism rose to power by the 1980 elections. In doing so, I will look at how factors within the American economy, civil rights issues, and political workings of the United States contributed to the fracturing of the liberal consensus and the rise of conservatism.
The years leading up to the 1972 election were filled with new political tactics. Going into the election year, President Nixon seemed like he could never lose the second term election after successfully negotiating with Vietnam, Beijing, and Russia to improve international relations (Emery 4). Raising international toughness made Nixon seem like the most worthy person to stay president. Fred Emery analyses in his novel Watergate: The Corruption of American Politics and the Fall of Richard Nixon, the president was also setting up the first summit meeting in history with Soviet Union Presidents (3). There seemed to be nothing capable of holding the seemingly responsible man back. However, this assurance came with massive consequences. The absolute certainty that Nixon would be reelected fueled the lies and abuse of power by the Nixon government (Emery 195). As the outlook of landslide winnings took over the White House, the moral reasoning, “the end justifies the means” became more prevalent. Nixon was obsessed with winning and being successful. Under his command his staff did whatever possible to ...
One way to win an elected office is by discrediting your opponent. Although Wallace campaigned on the values of segregation, his vow to bring American back to a Godly country overwhelmed his constituents. Demoralizing the opponent working in his favor; creating the sense of too much government involvement is a cornerstone for any campaign.Wallace was able to use riots and impurity as a cornerstone of Americans leaving fundamental values. These impurities were caused by government involvement, according to Wallace.
“My Fellow Americans, I come before you tonight as a candidate for the Vice Presidency and as a man whose honesty and integrity has been questioned.” New York Post had printed an article condemning Richard Nixon of stealing money from his campaign for his own personal use of spendings. Luckily Dwight Eisenhower, Nixon’s fellow Presidential candidate, allowed and advised Nixon to explain himself to the American people who wanted to throw him off. Providing a speech on television, Nixon did something no one else had done before and he summarized the history of all the money he had spent and received since starting his career in politics. What Nixon had thought as an unsuccessful speech, triumphed and moved the American citizens knowing he spoke
Television has affected every aspect of life in society, radically changing the way individuals live and interact with the world. However, change is not always for the better, especially the influence of television on political campaigns towards presidency. Since the 1960s, presidential elections in the United States were greatly impacted by television, yet the impact has not been positive. Television allowed the public to have more access to information and gained reassurance to which candidate they chose to vote for. However, the media failed to recognize the importance of elections. Candidates became image based rather than issue based using a “celebrity system” to concern the public with subjects regarding debates (Hart and Trice). Due to “hyperfamiliarity” television turned numerous people away from being interested in debates between candidates (Hart and Trice). Although television had the ability to reach a greater number of people than it did before the Nixon/Kennedy debate, it shortened the attention span of the public, which made the overall process of elections unfair, due to the emphasis on image rather than issue.
Both sides desired a republican form of government. Each wanted a political system that would “protect the equality and liberty of the individuals from aristocratic privilege and…tyrannical power.” (404) However, the north and south differed greatly in “their perceptions of what most threatened its survival.” (404) The secession by the south was an attempt to reestablish republicanism, as they no longer found a voice in the national stage. Prior to the 1850s, this conflict had been channeled through the national political system. The collapse of the two-party system gave way to “political reorganization and realignment,” wrote Holt. The voters of the Democrats shifted their influence toward state and local elections, where they felt their concerns would be addressed. This was not exclusively an economically determined factor. It displayed the exercise of agency by individual states. Holt pointed out, “[T]he emergence of a new two-party framework in the South varied from state to state according to the conditions in them.” (406) The “Deep South” was repulsed by the “old political process,” most Southerners trusted their state to be the safeguards of republicanism. (404) They saw the presidential election of Abraham Lincoln, a member of the “the anti-Southern Republican party,” as something the old system could not
Years from now, historians will look back at this period in American history as one of intolerable prejudice amongst a vast portion of the public and shortsightedness amongst many political leaders. Opinions and views of everyday life are influenced by an array of factors. Political Communicators use persuasion, an effective technique used to convince and alter ones attitudes and ideas towards another spectrum to achieve their goal. Often, an inaccurate message is presented to the audience designed to influence our beliefs and values.
In this paper I am going to discuss the rhetorical appeals, as well as the argumentative structure, audience and purpose set forth by George W. Bush in his September 27 speech in Flagstaff, Arizona. More specifically I will refer to the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos and logos, and explain how they are used to gain the support and attention of the audience and further the further the purpose of the speech. As I explain these appeals I will also give an insight into the argumentative structure and why it is apparent in this particular speech.
The aim of this paper is to look at the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections. This paper will focus on the function of television in presidential elections through three main areas: exit polls, presidential debates, and spots. The focus is on television for three reasons. First, television reaches more voters than any other medium. Second, television attracts the greatest part of presidential campaign budgets. Third, television provides the candidates a good opportunity to contact the people directly. A second main theme of this paper is the role of television in presidential elections in terms of representative democracy in the United States.
Rhetoric is the art of effective speaking or writing, and persuasion. Most people use rhetoric numerous of times in their everyday life without their concern or knowing.
During the Kennedy/Nixon campaign in 1960 in their presidential bid, the media had to play a role in influencing the outcomes of votes. For instance, during the campaigns, the media showed that Nixon should have spent more of his time practicing what he would say to the audience rather than focused on the physical impression he would make. This approach had an adverse impact on how he was viewed since the powder that he applied to his person started fading as he was sweating during the
Mass media has come a long way since 1960. President Nixon first used the media to present himself to the United States citizens. The history channel stated, “The Kennedy-Nixon debates not only had a major impact on the election’s outcome, but ushered in a new era in which crafting a public image and taking advantage of media exposure became essential ingredients of a successful political campaign.” (A&E Television Networks, LLC)