Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Limits and merits of the genocide convention essay
Examples of genocide throughout history
Limits and merits of the genocide convention essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Limits and merits of the genocide convention essay
How can one philosophically look past the act of genocide without mustering a plan to unite and prevent such an inhumane action? Genocide has been occurring for many decades whether it is publicized or left unnoticed. The act is carried out by many methods in which humans, such as you and I, are dehumanized and stripped of their dignity. For example, Jews and Rwandans were forced to carry or wear symbols and cards to exploit their ethnic identity, making them vulnerable to violent acts carried out by those not in favor of their ethnicity. Can the world resolve the problem of genocide, the acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, as stated by Raphael Lemkin? Genocide can be prevented by establishing legal notions and international law, human rights protected by strict law, and awareness and teamwork worldwide. …show more content…
As stated in Document A, “...declaring genocide an international crime and assuring international cooperation for its prevention and punishment…”, concludes the idea that establishing a strict law against genocide with punishments that include jail time if not obeyed will pull us closer to preventing it altogether. By studying the problem of genocide, we can work as one in unity to educate younger, and possibly smarter, audiences to produce enough powerful awareness. With high hopes, this will lead to creating laws that will be observed and followed by almost all nations and groups, especially those visibly vulnerable to genocide. Although an immediate result will be highly unlikely, a drastic change will be seen over time in contrast to current and past events involving
The physical and mental intent to destroy another being often unveils the darkest side of human nature. In the memoir, “An Ordinary Man: An Autobiography” dedicated to the Rwandan genocide, war hero Paul Rusesabagina states: “A sad truth of human nature is that it is hard to care for people when they are abstractions, hard to care when it is not you or somebody close to you. Unless the world community can stop finding ways to dither in the face of this monstrous threat to humanity those words never again will persist in being one of the most abused phrases in the English language and one of the greatest lies of our time.” The United Nations promised never again would they allow genocide to occur after the Second World War. Unfortunately, less
Genocide is a pressing issue with a multitude of questions and debates surrounding it. It is the opinion of many people that the United Nations should not get involved with or try to stop ongoing genocide because of costs or impositions on the rights of a country, but what about the rights of an individual? The UN should get involved in human rights crimes that may lead to genocide to prevent millions of deaths, save money on humanitarian aid and clean up, and fulfill their responsibilities to stop such crimes. It is preferable to stop genocide before it occurs through diplomacy, but if necessary, military force may be used as a last resort. Navi Pillay, Human Rights High Commissioner, stated, “Concerted efforts by the international community at critical moments in time could prevent the escalation of violence into genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or ethnic cleansing.”
Can genocide ever be stopped? For decades the UN (United Nations) has tried to abolish all kinds of genocide; unfortunately, we do not believe in equality as a species, and this perfect utopia seems impossible in our day and age. In 1994, during the genocide in Rwanda (one of the bloodiest genocides of all time) the United Nations tried to make a stand and stop this massacre once and for all. Grievously, the UN’s mission terminated due to the lack of resources; the UN military was forced to watch while the genocide continued(Document A). Genocide has been occurring for decades, anything from clans like the KKK to the extermination of Jews during WW2. Genocides happened to a multitude of minorities, ironically, no one has made a considerable stand to stop them. Generally speaking, the abolishing of genocide seems unattainable in our modern day due to 3 reasons: Lack of media attention, Human innate stubbornness, and abominable people.
A total of 11 million people died during the Holocaust. The Holocaust was started by the Nazi’s in the 1930’s. It was were about six million Jews were killed. Misinformed individuals theorize that the Holocaust is not a form of genocide but they are misguided. The Holocaust should be considered an example of genocide based on the UN’s definition, the stages of genocide and the specific evidence provided in the memoir Night.
Greenfield, Daniel M. "Crime of Complicity in Genocide: How the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia Got It Wrong, and Why It Matters." The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 98.3 (2008): 921-24. HeinOnline. Web. 18 Apr. 2011.
- The meaning of Genocide, and the impact it has on a single person and society.
What is genocide? “Genocide is a deliberate, systematic destruction of racial cultural or political groups.”(Feldman 29) What is the Holocaust? “Holocaust, the period between 1933-1945 when Nazi Germany systematically persecuted and murdered millions of Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses, and many other people.”(Feldman 29) These two things tie into each other.The Holocaust was a genocide. Many innocent people were torn apart from their families, for many never to see them again. This murder of the “Jewish people of Europe began in spring 1941.”( Feldman 213) The Holocaust was one of the most harshest things done to mankind.
There are ways to prevent genocide from occurring through all eight steps of genocide. Through the first step of classification is the first way to prevent genocide. The article points out, “Classification may be attacked through devaluation through the distinctive features used to classify…” (Stanton 5). This shows that genocide can be prevented through the mixture of different people and their culture. Through the second step of symbolization genocide can again be prevented. The article suggests, “Symbolization can be attacked by legally forbidding use of hate symbols or ethnic classification words” (Stanton 5). This is another way to prevent genocide a little further into the process. The third step of dehumanization can also help prevent genocide. The article declares, “Dehumanization should be opposed openly whenever it shows…” (Stanton 5). This shows that being openly against treating someone less than human in itself will help prevent genocide. Through the fourth step of organization, there is another way to prevent genocide. The article explains, “Organizations that commit acts of genocide should be banned, and membership in them made a crime” (Stanton 5). This shows how the government can help prevent genocide instead of helping it. The fifth step of polarization can further prevent genocide. The article mentions, “Polarization can be fought by providing financial and
To start off with, what is genocide? Genocide is the killing of a massive number of people of in a group. Genocide has not only been practices in the present day, but it has been practiced for m...
Various schools of thought exist as to why genocide continues at this deplorable rate and what must be done in order to uphold our promise. There are those who believe it is inaction by the international community which allows for massacres and tragedies to occur - equating apathy or neutrality with complicity to evil. Although other nations may play a part in the solution to genocide, the absolute reliance on others is part of the problem. No one nation or group of nations can be given such a respo...
SAINATI, TATIANA E. "Toward A Comparative Approach To The Crime Of Genocide." Duke Law Journal 62.1 (2012): 161-202. Academic Search Premier. Web. 25 Nov. 2013
The Holocaust was one of the most tragic and trying times for the Jewish people. Hundreds of thousands of Jews and other minorities that the Nazis considered undesirable were detained in concentration camps, death camps, or labor camps. There, they were forced to work and live in the harshest of conditions, starved, and brutally murdered. Horrific things went on in Auschwitz and Majdenek during the Holocaust that wiped out approximately 1,378,000 people combined. “There is nothing that compares to the Holocaust.” –Fidel Castro
“Never again. Leaders throughout the world had declared that after the Holocaust. The President of The Genocide Watch explains, “The history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.” The promise the United Nations made was broken…genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined”(Stanton). Throughout history, people have killed others. Normally, it is because of hatred. Unfortunately, most of the time, people can have a deeply rooted hatred of an entire group of people. That hatred soon leads to genocide. Genocide cannot be prevented in the future because of the inevitability of evil, some people are ignorant and refuse to give into the reality that all people should be equal and not discriminated against, and society would not be able to persuade everyone in the world to agree and prevent future genocides.
The question of moral validity has plagued societies for millennia. Unsurprisingly, this question afflicted Indonesia between 1965 and 1966. In the early days of October 1965, a group of conspirators took and killed six generals. The disagreement of whom caused this coup caused the killing of more than 80,000 (1,000,000 in some areas) people. This caused a social change from aristocrats to an Indonesian business class. For other peoples around the world, the view of this genocide was a victory over communism. While these killings were clearly morally deplorable, the result was an improved and restructured government; a victory for capitalism at the height of the Cold War.
Hymowitz, Sarah, and Amelia Parker. "Lessons - The Genocide Teaching Project - Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law." American University Washington College of Law. American UniversityWashington College of Law Center for Human Rights and Humanitaian Law, 2011. Web. 9 Mar. 2011. .