The Argument In Favor Of Genocide: Again And Again

681 Words2 Pages

“Never again. Leaders throughout the world had declared that after the Holocaust. The President of The Genocide Watch explains, “The history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.” The promise the United Nations made was broken…genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined”(Stanton). Throughout history, people have killed others. Normally, it is because of hatred. Unfortunately, most of the time, people can have a deeply rooted hatred of an entire group of people. That hatred soon leads to genocide. Genocide cannot be prevented in the future because of the inevitability of evil, some people are ignorant and refuse to give into the reality that all people should be equal and not discriminated against, and society would not be able to persuade everyone in the world to agree and prevent future genocides. …show more content…

It is inevitable because no one can persuade someone’s actions unless they kill that person themselves, making it impossible for the other to commit an evil action. But than the one who killed the other is evil, and the chain reaction will keep going. One cannot foresee what another will do in the future and one person surely cannot have such a strong impact on another that they would vow to prevent genocide. Some people are the way they are for a reason. If they are evil, someone may never be able to change that because that’s just the way they were meant to be. All trying will do is delay the inevitable, and even then that is not stopping genocide from

Open Document