Genetically Modified Foods Ethical Case Study

541 Words2 Pages

The right of corporates to patent Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) represents one of the most provocative issues related to genetically modified food. A patent refers to the legal right that gives ownership of an invention to the person/organization that created it. Only the owner of the patent has the exclusive right to produce that invention. Other people/organizations cannot produce it without the patent owner's permission. A license fee must be paid in order to get such a permission (Freedman, 2009). In this way, if a company is producing a genetically modified seed for insect-resistant crop that grows in dry regions, people in poor countries cannot get these seeds except by buying it from the company that holds the patent. The company …show more content…

Some corporates have considered such cases as patent breach. Corporates developing GMOs justify their need for patent by telling that they need it make back their financial investment, in addition to stating that in this way they encourage other companies to invent new products. Applying a patent on a genetically modified plant leads to developing an economic synergism on living organism that did not exist previously, and also may cause technical and economic issues (Schiva, 2017). The FDA's own scientists have concerns about genetically engineered foods and thus have warned about it. However, the FDA ignores the advice of its own scientists, and decides to support the biotech industries in their quest to "patent life" (Olsen, 2017). Laws regulating GMOs patent differs among countries. There exist a lot of legal issues that are debated nationally (in courts) and internationally (in organizations as United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, and World Trade Organization). GMOs are alive, and thus new questions are raised continuously e.g. "Do patents extend to the offspring of a patented GMO?" (Denton & Restivo,

Open Document