Genetic Engineering Persuasive Essay

In “Future of Osteoporosis Genetics: Enhancing Genome-Wide
Association Studies” Farber stated that the strategy has been effective for” simple” (Faber 2). It says how it is simple to change your genetics. But, the tradition genetic analysis attempts to directly relate to DNA variation to clinical trials. Why should people with money have access to enhancing genes? It is like football players on steroids to enhance their playing ability. They are changing who they are just to do something better. Modification to humans shouldn’t be allowed. The modification will suffer from ethical imperative. The abilities will have a suffering and knowingly withhold that help. The big picture is that we are genetically altering our genes. That would changing who we are meant to be. Instead of working for that reward, we are just inserting it into us. There is already so much inequality and disparity in the world.

Instead of spending time and money on figuring out ways to change genes scientist should put the same effort in to figuring out cures for people with illnesses. But also comes down to the fact that one to the other thing without suffering there is no such compassion. Honestly, that might sound cruel and harmful but that’s the cold heart truth. In addition, human gene modification is so wrong to the point that. If a person does not want the genes it came with naturally. They start nit picking and choosing what is more appealing to that person. Then aborting babies will start being a thing. People will not get what they want from the babies.
The modification of human genes is a slippery slope. There is so much new technology that we don’t fully understand how it works and the ramification, despite the arrogance of the advocates. For example, the cloning of Dolly the sheep died very young due to the fact of the again that happened to her mother. Along with that said, humans should not be tampered