Fredrick Douglass Anti-Slavery Debate

921 Words2 Pages

Ideally, anti-slavery debate consisted of many arguments fronted by mainly former slaves. The former slaves provided a clear picture of the slave situation, particularly in America. Therefore, they attempted to highlight the plight of the slaves. Fredrick Douglass, a former slave escapist from Maryland, is a renowned anti-slave crusader and a believer in slave abolitionism. In his narrative, Douglass explains his journey a slave in which his experiences influence the arguments he fronts during his anti-slavery campaign. In this context, Douglas argues that slavery was cruel, inhumane and was supported by the Christian religion his masters believed in and abided. Additionally, he argues that slavery is not legal however much the whites tried …show more content…

Throughout the narrative, Fredrick Douglass gives a descriptive account of his experiences as a slave and his arguments against the practice of slavery is evident in these experience. He describes how he witnessed his aunt Hester being whipped by her master Ms. Auld. Aunt Hester "was led into the kitchen, forced to strip from her neck to her lower waist, leaving her entire neck, shoulders and the back entirely naked. Also, He then told her to cross her pair of hands and soon the warm red blood came dripping from the floor. Furthermore, I was so terrified and horror-stricken when I saw the scenario" (Douglass, 1845). His argument is that Ms. Auld became a bad person because of owning slaves. "Also, this good heart had but a little time to remain such. In addition, the dangerous poison due to irresponsible power was in her lethal hands, and soon commenced its infernal work. Also, that cheerful eye under the influence of slavery soon became fumed with anger; the voice made of sweet rhythm, changed to one of harsh, rude and horrid discord’’ (Douglass, 1845). From this experience, we are able to learn that Douglass argument was that slaves were not treated as human beings and were considered as property. Douglass states that “I trace my first glimmering conception of the dehumanizing character of slavery” (Douglass, …show more content…

The slave owners consistently instilled fear into the slaves through terrific events supported by the judicial system at that time. Douglass remembers an incident where Gore whipped a fellow slave named Demby consistently to death. Even after killing Demby, Gore was upbeat and did not seem bothered since the law seemingly legalized slavery, and a master's words were law. Gore would later explain to Loyd that the killing of Demby would act as an example to any disobedient slave. The rule had been set ‘obey or die’. Douglass argues that there existed different moral and legal systems for both the slaves and their masters. Additionally, Douglass argues that slaves were ruled by their masters through examples and were scared into submission through physical and mental

Open Document