Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing grendel to frankenstein
Comparison between Grendel and Frankenstein
Comparing grendel to frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing grendel to frankenstein
One In The Same Grendel and the fiend in Frankenstein are characters from two different stories. Even though they entered the world in different ways, they can be seen as being the same character because of the amount of qualities they share like: showing interest in art, living their life as outsiders, and growing up innocent then turning into the true monsters they are. Grendel is an intelligent monster who is capable of being just as human as anyone else in John Gardner’s novel. Aside from Grendel’s hideous appearance and his emotional outbursts, there was very little that separated him from the rest of the world. Just like the Danes, Grendel was moved by the words that were being spoken out of the Shaper’s mouth. He was moved by the …show more content…
The monster was not always evil. He was innocent in the beginning. He was kind and sensitive to other people’s feelings. “The gentle manners and beauty of the cottagers greatly endeared them to me; when they were unhappy, I felt depressed; when they rejoiced, I sympathized in their joys” (Shelley 131). People did not understand that the monster possibly could have been the gentlest soul that they would have ever met, but they did not give him the chance. They relied too much on his external appearance to assume that he was wicked. Grendel and the monster wanted to experience having someone to talk to, but since they did not receive this friendship, they became the actual monsters people thought they were in the first place. In John Gardner’s novel, Grendel, and the monster in Frankenstein, have multiple characteristics that are similar. They are characters from different books, so how is it possible that they can be alike? Even though they come from different stories, they are identical because of the different qualities they possess like being extremely powerful and living as the “brute existence by which humankind learns to define itself” (Gardner 73). These two characters ultimately are one in the
“I wanted it, yes! Even if I must be the outcast,” (55). This is after Grendel has listened to the Shaper’s story about Cain and Abel. Grendel learns that he is the cursed descendant of Cain and is forever destined to be a monster. At first, he didn’t want to believe that is was true but after a while, he gladly accepted the role thus creating his own meaning. “I was Grendel, Ruiner of Meadhalls, Wrecker of Kings!” (80). This is when Grendel is experiencing his newfound invincibility to the humans and their weapons and he is tormenting them. After he visits the dragon in Chapter 5, Grendel has a renewed sense of confidence of who he is - which is a monster. In Chapter 6, he continues to terrorize the Danes and pursuing his monstrous desires. Grendel is acting upon his role as the monster because after speaking to the dragon, he realizes that nothing can stop
Grendel varies from the simple, childish tone of "'Why can't I have someone to talk to? The Shaper has people to talk to'" (53) to the dense philosophical metaphors and complex diction of Grendel's conversation with the dragon. Gardener gives Grendel a purposefully guileless voice to illustrate both the monster's feelings of lost youth as well as his progression into a more sentient being.
Our first character, Grendel, is an exceptionally diverse character. It is implied that in both book and poem, Grendel is a blood-thirsty monster. All Grendel does is go through meadhalls and kill the drunk, often asleep people. But when narrated through the eyes of Grendel, the true nature of this beast is discovered. The author of Grendel entails that Grendel is a depressed and misunderstood monster, restrained to the confinements of his own underwater cave. He is a lot like the monster in the book Frankenstein. Both Grendel and Frankenstein are born with no real purpose to life, going off of what they hear other people say and taking it as the truth. Both monsters, knowing that everyone detests them for being unattractive and different, retaliate by way of murder and mayhem. From the perspective of the people in the stories itself, Grendel is exactly how the narrator in the poem Beowulf makes him out to be. The people, or the thanes, of Hrothgar’s kingdom see Grendel as a demon from hell, representing all that’s evil in the world. He’s a supernatural creature and in this time period anything supernatural that wasn’t human was considered a spirit, a god, evil or, in Grendel...
Both these characters exude such power and strength through their personalities. The way they handle situations and the way they don’t give up on themselves is something that is truly honorable. Grendel and Frankenstein, both very different from each other, are both very similar in regards to their heroism. These two characters are essentially alone in their societies and have nobody to turn to for help. They base everything around their beliefs and what they feel is the good and bad thing to do, whether society rejects their beliefs or not. Their loyalty to themselves illustrates their heroism of honesty, loyalty, courage and bravery and their never ending power to continue to fight alone for themselves against a world who wishes to overlook their existence and contributions to diversify the society.
One thing that influences perception of reality that is initially explored in Grendel are words. This is demonstrated when Grendel secretly listens to the poem sung by the shaper, who is a blind court bard who sings poems with the harp, and sees how the people are
The monsters are specifically identified as something “other” outside of humanity. “The creature does not choose to be alienated. Rather it is, in fact, others who isolate it, because of its hideous appearance.” (Brannstrom 10-11) In spite of the obvious bias of this quotation, it draws towards an overarching idea. How the monsters are the dark side of man. That’s their narrative intent. Even in the creature’s case where he seems to be a Tabula Rasa onto which man creates violence; he is partly intended to show, “...alienation and how innocent victims are affected by it” (Brannstromm 3) Grendel is certainly meant to represent the darker thoughts of man, with Gardner insinuating that excessive, “nihilistic or existential thoughts caused the violence of Grendel.” (Merril 166) and his physical form is monstrous even more so than the creature’s. The reader is left in a situation where the acts of man on the two monsters aren’t unjustified, and the acts of the monsters as retribution aren’t unjustified. When man first met Grendel, they assumed he was dangerous and hurt him. When Frankenstein first saw his creation, he fled in
As time goes on, many things tend to change, and then they begin to inherit completely different images. Over the years, the character, created by Dr. Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’s famous novel, has changed dramatically. The monster, regularly called “Frankenstein,” has been featured in numerous films, such as Frankenweenie and Edward Scissorhands. Although, the characters in today’s pop culture and the monster in the well-known 1800’s novel have similarities, they are actually very different. The many similarities and differences range from the character’s physical traits and psychological traits, the character’s persona, and the character’s place in the Gothic style.
Grendel tries to become part of society by attempting to befriend the humans. “I sank to my knee, crying, Friend! Friend!... their spears came through…” (p.52). Here this quote shows he wants to make friends with the humans, but because of his appearance and differences, he is shunned. This causes the hatred in him to kill. Likewise, the monster kills because of his abandonment. The monster wants his creator to feel his pain, so he kills members of his family. ”I may die, but first you, my tyrant and tormentor, shall curse the sun that gazes on your misery” (Chapter 20). Both creatures throughout their stories use killing as an escape to find happiness and revenge for the treatment they have
Frankenstein, and Othello are the same because Othello was mistreated because he was black. He was hated due to his appearance. He was a minority, and faced racism on a daily basis. The monster in Frankenstein was mistreated because he was ugly. He was bullied so bad because of his appearance. This caused the monster to be evil and do devilish acts. Both the monster in Frankenstein and Othello had good intentions. They were not treated properly which made them become bad people. Iago treated Othello horribly by using racial slurs toward him. Jekyll and Hyde were similar to Frankenstein because Jekyll and Hyde had two personalities just like the monster did. One side of Jekyll and Hyde was evil, and the other was good. The monster in Frankenstein was the same because he started out as a good monster, and had good intentions. He was treated so horribly by people because of the way he looked, that he turned
Grendel is in the tree with an injured ankle which gets exacerbated by the “mechanical” bull charging at him. Then the humans come and Grendel realizes something, “... and suddenly I knew I was dealing with no dull mechanical bull but with thinking creatures, pattern makers, the most dangerous things I’d ever met” (Gardner 27). Grendel encounters humans and discovers that they are not mechanical. This is threatening to Grendel because it seems as if everything he has dealt with thus far has been mechanical. He knows they are dangerous because they are unpredictable, and smart, nothing like the bull he had faced earlier. They have the ability to break out of routine and make new patterns. His hatred of Hrothgar and his people began that night when they attacked him when he posed no threat, he was simply hungry. This initiated Grendel’s relentless obsession with
John Gardner’s Grendel portrays a monster searching for his purpose in life. The characters know the meaning of their lives, but Grendel tries to discover his role and what life has to offer him. Grendel discovers his identity through other characters’ actions and beliefs. In Grendel, John Gardner illustrates the contrasting views of each character to show their view of society and the influence they have on Grendel.
One technique that Gardner uses to display Grendel as a man is by writing from Grendel’s perspective. According to John Gardner's Grendel and the Interpretation of Modern Fables,
Evil. It’s a concept that has baffled philosophers, religious figures, and the common man alike for thousands of years. In this millennium, people may exemplify evil as terrorism, genocide, or, perhaps, placing an empty milk carton back in the refrigerator. However, many remain conflicted about the exact definition of evil, as the dispute over the character Grendel, from the John Gardner novel, makes evident. To conclude that Grendel is not evil, readers must first operate under the assumption that the beast is unequivocally and thoroughly evil. Having done so, readers will notice the fallacies within this thought process. By asserting that Grendel is evil, readers blatantly disregard the ambiguity with which humanity defines its actions, as
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and the monster that he creates are very similar. For example, Victor creates the monster to be like himself. Another similarity is that the anger of both Victor and the monster is brought about by society. One more parallel between Victor and the monster is that they both became recluses. These traits that Victor and the monster possess show that they are very similar.
Characters from different novels have similar personalities. As creators of another creature, God and Victor Frankenstein are very similar, in that they both lose part of their "family," and they let the war between them and their creations go on too long. Victor says, "I collected bones from charnel houses; and disturbed, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human frame." This shows that he creates the monster out of corpses, just as God creates Satan. Furthermore, Victor is disgusted with his own creation, "the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart."