Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the Jim Crow laws
Jim Crow laws and their effects
The effects of jim crow laws in the south
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of the Jim Crow laws
How is it that ex-felons are not allowed to vote once they have served their time in prison? Why is it that a nation who is considered to be democratic like the United States does not allow ex-felons to vote even after serving time in prison? Meanwhile, other developed and industrialized nations allow their incarcerated population form part of the electorates. Is our criminal justice system objective as we think of it? Felon disenfranchisement has been an ongoing issue throughout all fifty states where laws vary. Since the founding of this nation felon disenfranchisement has been a common thing, Article 1 Section 2 of the U.S constitution grants states the authority to define who can vote in federal elections and as a result felon disqualification has remained a common component of the federal elections. This means that if someone commits a crime in one state and he or she is considered a felon but in another state that same crime is considered a misdemeanor. The fact that the laws in these states target certain groups where the demographics of those states are predominately composed of minorities it may seem like a coincidence but many believe it is an indirect form of discrimination. African Americans did not have the right to suffrage until after the Civil Rights movements. They were granted the right to vote through The Voting Rights Act, but before that they were discriminated from voting through discriminatory laws that states implemented like the Jim Crow laws. After the Civil rights movement the Southern democratic elites, in order to maintain control of the government, amended their constitutions in ways which disenfranchised ex-felons. They argued that they were not discriminating based on race but rather by the crimes... ... middle of paper ... ... Liberties Union) who advocated for felons and the rights through courts, legislatures and groups to preserve rights that are granted to every citizen in the Constitution and the laws of The United States. They also help ex- felons through the process of regaining their rights back. Their job is primarily to get the issue of ex-felon voting on the public agenda both on a state and national level. Although there is yet a lot of work to be done the ACLU has helped many people in the fight for regaining civil liberties. We ask ourselves why is it that we have such low voter turnout rates when it comes to presidential elections not to mention state and local election that have far worse turnout. But we fail to factor in the amount of people who are barred from voting sometimes for life. Felon voting laws disenfranchise about 5.85 million Americans with criminal record.
"Too many Americans go to too many prisons for far too long, and for no good law-enforcement reason … Although incarceration has a role to play in our justice system, widespread incarceration at the federal, state and local levels is both ineffective and unsustainable. . . We need to ensure that incarceration is used to punish, deter and rehabilitate – not merely to convict, warehouse and forget"(Holder). Former Attorney General Eric Holder does not dispute that prisons play an important role in the justice system. He believes that along with punishing the inmate’s prisons should provide them with rehabilitation. With the already overpopulated prison system across the US there should be alternative for lesser nonviolent offences.
Some people in our country can’t vote because they have felons for the same reason. They aren’t violent criminals, they just made a small mistake or two and now can’t have a voice in our political system because of it. You are in a sense taking away their voice and they think they no longer matter, they may even commit more crimes if they feel unwanted or left out. When released felons are released and have paid their debt to society denying them the right to vote it is essentially taxation without representation(3).
In the United States 2.2 million citizens are incarcerated on felony charges. Laws in America prohibit felons from voting. As a result, on Election Day 5.3 million citizens of America are disenfranchised because of crimes they once committed. Though they once broke the law, they have served their time and have been punished adequately in accordance with the American Justice System. Felons should regain full voting rights after their stint in prison.
One of the more controversial debates in today’s political arena, especially around election times, is that of felon disenfranchisement. The disenfranchisement of felons, or the practice of denying felons and ex-felons the right to vote, has been in practice before the colonization of America and traces back to early England; however, it has not become so controversial and publicized until recent times. “In today’s political system, felons and ex-felons are the only competent adults that are denied the right to vote; the total of those banned to vote is approximately 4.7 million men and women, over two percent of the nation’s population” (Reiman 3).
Michelle Alexander, in her book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, examines the development of institutionalized racism following the war on drugs, and how it has created what Alexander calls a “New Jim Crow era,” or a racial caste in the US. Alexander describes this undercaste as, “a lower caste of individuals who are permanently barred by law and custom from mainstream society,” (Alexander, 32). Not only is this because of mass incarceration rates among black men, but extends to the effects that these branded felons must face beyond prison walls. By checking the well known box on any application, it has become legal for almost any institution or corporation to discriminate against a marked felon. Alexander notes that, “Once you’re labeled a felon, the old forms of discrimination – employment discrimination, housing discrimination, denial of the right to vote, denial of educational opportunity, denial of food stamps and other public benefits, and exclusio...
Felon voting laws limit the restrictions for a felon to vote on any election. “Felon voting has not been federally regulated because some people argue that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act can be tied to felon disenfranchisement and the Congress has the authority to legislate felon voting in federal elections.” Felon disenfranchisement is excluding people otherwise eligible to vote from voting due to conviction of a criminal offence, usually restricted to the more serious class of crimes, felonies. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures and The Sentencing Project, 1 in 40 adults were unable to vote due to a felony conviction in the 2008 elections. One purpose of the felon voting laws is the uncertainty of trusting
26, 2007 editorial "Another No Vote on Felons," published in the Washington Times: “Even in nearby Massachusetts, no stranger to progressivism, voters in 2000 supported a constitutional amendment to bar inmates from voting. The reason is clear: Most people think perpetrators of serious crimes have violated the public trust and cannot be permitted to help determine the future of the communities they harmed”. This view point is helpful to help undecided people see the potential harm of letting free convicted prisoners vote. Also, it is interesting how the very thought of convicted felons vote places such concern in the law abiding citizens’ thoughts. One may notice that particular past criminals may not have the best interest in what best for the community. Furthermore, one may notice that prisoners may be cut off from the events of the world, and wouldn’t have information to help them elect officials for the communities they may harmed. In, addition this may be true under the circumstance that some felons are not capable of making great choices for the community as a whole. As well as, if they have harmed the community they shouldn’t be able to vote on the wellbeing of the people they have
whims of state legislatures. Laws that prohibit felons from voting are a punishment above and
Karjick, Kevin. “Why Can’t Ex-Felons Vote?” Washingtonpost.com. Washington Post, 18 Aug. 2004: A19. Web. 17 Oct. 2012.
The whole idea of taking away a convicted felon’s voting rights started in Rome when they were the controlling empire. Nowadays, a majority of prisons throughout the United States are allowing felons to vote on who becomes the next president. Even though they have committed murder, rape, thievery, we blow off those thoughts and allow felons to have a say in who runs this beautiful country. So the question is, should we allow convicted felons to vote? Not a chance would I ever say yes into letting felons choose our next president! Would you want to stand next to a convicted felon as you vote? I have a hard time imagining this act.
In most states ex-felons are not allowed to vote. This takes away a large portion of the voting population because of how many ex-felons there are right now and the many more that will be in the future. Ex-felons may also have a very hard time finding a job or a place to live. Legally landlords are allowed to deny an ex-felon. In Carbondale Illinois rental properties owners “Home Rentals” does background checks to make sure that none of their potential renters are felons. If they are felons Home Rentals claims that they will deny them the privilege of living in one of their properties. Ex-felons may also have a hard time finding jobs. Not many employers are willing to employ ex-felons for the fear of more crime or less commitment. Though denying these ex-felons jobs will not help the economy, only giving them jobs can help that.
In the City Journal editorial entitled, “Should Felons Vote?” Edward Feser argues if having felons vote it would make any contribution to society. He says that if felons had the right to vote more democrats would be in power and felons would feel like they fit back into society making them act more civilized. But the question still is asked if this is considered a fair punishment. Feser says that this would pull votes more to “the left”. If the statement is true, it is questionable as to if that is the reason that felons are disenfranchised.
People who are convicted of felonies lose their rights to vote and other public rights, while corporation are convicted of felonies and they never lose their political right (Barak, 101). The criminal justice system is out to control the people, especially the people of color and in poverty. Money talks and the rich people are always getting away “murder”, while the poor are just be collected and thrown into cage to rot. The media always shows what they want to keep people controlled, they are another source of keeping fearing the people.
The term criminal desistance refers to when offenders desist, or stop, committing crime. Desistance from crime exists when an individual has an absence of criminal behavior in their lives for a sustained period of time. By studying desistance, a better understanding of what causes individuals to commit crime is created; as well as, a better understanding as to why certain individuals discontinue their lives of crime. The criminal justice field often encompasses, serving justice by locking people up and keeping the “bad guys” away from the general public. Little thought was given as to what can be done in order to help prevent people from committing crime, until more recent years. Most criminological theories attempt to explain why people commit
The United States of America contains the third largest population in the world, as well as the world’s largest prison population (Aliprandini and Finley). In order for the large criminal justice system to be successful, it must have a strong parole system. But the U.S. parole system is known to have a multitude of problems within it. Many of these problems can be solved by focusing on the relationships between the parole officers and the parolees (a person on parole). By participating in systems to better the work ethic of parole officers. Following through to fixing these affairs may seem unrealistic, however the outcome would be beneficial to society.