False Memories In Angela's Ashes

1004 Words3 Pages

Salvador Dali once said “The difference between false memories and true ones is the same as for jewels: it is always the false ones that look the most real, the most brilliant”. Today, I am here to explain to you that life writing, memoirs and biographies are merely a representation of reality, and should therefore be classified as fiction. These genres all fit under the definition of “recount of a person’s history”. However, with very basic research into some memoirs, I found that they are much more than this; they are fabrications, under the pretence of a true story, leading unaware readers to believe false realities. Today, I will show you this by exposing a lie in one of the most famous memoirs, Angela’s Ashes. I will also show you that …show more content…

One of the most notable is when Frank McCourt recounts when he and his friends would visit Willie Harrold, who would charge them money to look at his sister’s undressing. Records have shown that Harrold, who later became heavily involved with the catholic church, didn’t have any sisters. While you may not think this affects the story significantly, knowing that Frank has flat-out lied, how can we know that he is telling the truth at all? This immediately imposes Frank as an unreliable narrator, automatically invalidating his story. This tall story also puts Harrold’s career at enormous risk. If his family records were not investigated, Frank’s statement that suggested he was an incestual pervert could potentially ruin any chance Harrold had in a career in the catholic church. And this is not the only time that Frank conflicts with the church. When describing his “miserable” life he states “worse yet is the miserable Irish Catholic childhood”. For the first of many times, he portrays the Catholic Church in a negative light. Regularly throughout the book, McCourt positions the reader to see the religion unflatteringly, by using techniques like silencing the Church’s perspective and describing it using unfavourable language. Rather than telling the truth, he forces the reader to see the world as he does, marginalising any other …show more content…

Perhaps the most prevalent theme of the book is based on the socio-economic status of being poor. However, upon analysis, it is obvious that McCourt has blown his situation far out of proportion. He claims that, while in Limerick, him and his family of three younger brothers lived in a tiny house, sleeping in the same bed with a public toilet literally metres from their front door that would overflow and run into their house that they would be forced to walk through it several times day, on top sleeping in the cold most nights due to lack of firewood and blankets. It is difficult to believe this scenario especially due to their diet of undernourishing food like black tea and bread a few times per week. How could these young children possibly survive in this living situation with the population of Limerick constantly suffering from diseases described? This narrative is simply too good to be true. On the very first page of Angela’s Ashes McCourt writes “When I look back on my childhood I wonder how I survived at all”. This alone evidently over emphasises The McCourts’ predicament. By his version, it is impossible to believe that they survived. Here it is obvious that Francis has fabricated this story, to the point where it could only be classified as fiction. McCourt’s only goal was to sell copies, resulting to counterfeiting his so called “life story” in order to capture the reader and entice them to

Open Document