Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Paper on frank lloyd wright
Paper on frank lloyd wright
Paper on frank lloyd wright
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Paper on frank lloyd wright
Humans originally created simple shelters for safety and warmth, but as humanity grew intellectually, socially, and industrially the idea of the house changed to also mean an extension of the family. What someone does or does not do with a house’s interior, exterior, and landscape could be a subtle or blunt statement about the family that resides there. As humanities need to express themselves through their homes grew more sophisticated, several careers developed to meet that demand. Architecture was one of those new careers and Frank Lloyd Wright was one of the leading architects during the twentieth century. Wright designed and supervised the construction of Fallingwater for the Kaufmann family and this family home soon became known as one …show more content…
The Kaufmann family consisted of Mr. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Mrs. Liliane S. Kaufmann and their son Edgar Kaufmann, Jr. (Appendix 3). Edgar Kaufmann, Jr., introduced Frank Lloyd Wright’s works to his parents and the rest was history (Waggoner). Of course the Kaufmann family had a particular idea of what they wanted rather than what Wright conjured up. The Kaufmann’s were thinking about a “year-round weekend house, with modern conveniences, away from the highway and closer to the waterfalls [Bear Run], where they liked to go sun bathing and picnicking,” in their preferred summer spot (Hoffmann). In 1935 Wright designed Fallingwater and presented his plans to the Kaufmann family (Appendix 4). The actual construction continued from 1936 to 1938 and resulted in a 5,330 square feet house. A later addition included a guesthouse assembled in 1939, which took up 1,700 square feet (Fallingwater). The total cost of the house’s construction was $155,000. If someone tried to replicate Fallingwater today they would spend over two million dollars and would most likely not reach the magnificence of the original dwelling. During Fallingwater’s construction the United States was still in the grips of the Great Depression. However, one could argue that Fallingwater’s construction marked an important turning point not only in the society’s frame of mind but also the economy. …show more content…
Fallingwater was a “flowering of Wright’s mature theories of organic architecture” and were sharpened by the new found vitality and blazing passion that the interactions with the Kaufmann family ignited (Lind). Fallingwater was designed with a unique asymmetrical and rather organic flair. Because Fallingwater is not perfectly balanced and symmetrical like many other architectural triumphs, the building itself appears to seamlessly blend with the surrounding natural environment. Fallingwater looks more like a “living thing sprouting out of the rocks” than an actual building (Toker). Franklin Toker seemed to describe the impact of Fallingwater the most accurately. Toker stated
In late 1912 Charles Schaeffer, founded the Dayton Canoe Club, and in 1913, they broke the ground for their new club to be built (Stoecker). Schenck & Williams Company, hired by Schaeffer, to be built with “all modern improvements,” commissioned Oliver Ritzert, who also designed and built the Ohio Theatre, for the building of the club (Hover 95). During the Great Dayton Flood of 1913, in the midst of construction, people rushed to the club to see if it was still standing, and to great amazement it was, one pamphlet stating, “…Possibly Neptune, understanding that we three, the water, the canoe and the individual, were inseparable friends, interceded and had the angry waters pass up, around, and even through our uncompleted Clubhouse, doing but little damage," (Stoecker). The club was almost finished only three months later, on the Eleventh of June, 1913 (Stoecker). Oliver designed the building in prairie style, with the building to seem to come naturally out of the bank of the confluence of t...
“Various animals build shelters but only humans built homes. (Pg. 1)” The word home evokes so many emotions and mental image of past and future. At the end of the day there is no greater comfort then going home. Yet in our daily hustle and bustle and hectic schedule we seldom take time to appreciate the most age old technology that keep us safe and provide comfort. From the basic shelter and cave dwelling of the earliest humans to the modern concrete jungle of the present, humans have move past the simple shelter. Technology has allowed us to build modern homes in various shapes and sizes but this technology follows thousands of years of footstep. The author did not just catalog different structures and domicile of human history but told a story of what these structure means to us. Moore starts off on a dig site searching for archaic structures. Moore explains how humans just don’t build shelter like most animals, human homes signifies social status, comfort, shelter and creativity. Moore uses the famous multimillion dollar house of Aaron Spelling in Hollywood as an example of how extravagant our humble dwelling can be. Human homes are different shapes and sizes and often build with different material and standard based on geographical location. I believe A Prehistory of Homes is a book about the history of technology because it is written about one of the most essential invention of human evolution. Human went from caves to build our own shelter. It allowed us to be mobile and become a foraging creature. The author addresses the most commonly shared interest and provides knowledge, history and relation to past and future of our homes.
Many of Frank Gehry’s early works reflect a refined manipulation of shapes and structures, whereby many of his buildings present distorted shapes or apparent structures. From the Guggenheim museum to the Walt Disney concert hall, Frank Gehry’s architecture is close to none. He cleverly plays with shapes and geometries. In this essay, I shall start with a brief analysis of Gehry’s house and the influences in the design of the house. I shall then analyze the extent to which Frank Lloyd Wright has inspired and influenced Gehry in the design of his house through a comparison with Frank Lloyd Wright’s Jacob’s house.
Wilbur and Orville Wright spent their lives building and working with mechanical devices. They began with little toys as children and then grew up and began working with bicycles. These works lead them towards their work with airplanes. The Wright Brothers tried for many years to build a successful flying machine and succeeded. The Wright Brothers laid the foundation for aviation when they made history by being the first to create a successful flying machine.
Landscape architecture has been around since the beginning of time, but it was not until Frederick Law Olmsted came along that the idea of integrating design into the landscape with plants, water, and structures that it turned into a thriving profession. To many, Olmsted is considered “a pioneer in the profession of landscape architecture, an urban planner, and a social philosopher, one of the first theoreticians and activists behind the national park and conservation movements” (Kalfus 1). Growing up, he did not ever graduate from formal schooling and just sat in on a few classes while at Yale in New Haven, Connecticut. Instead, he acquired his education from being out in the world through traveling and reading. He had a hard childhood. His mother died when he was just four years old and on his journeys around the world to Europe and China, he became sickly with seasickness, paralysis of the arm, typhoid fever, apoplexy, sumac poisoning, and at times suffered from depression. For many years he went on a journey within himself to find out whom he really was and what he wanted to do with his life, career wise. Frederick had one brother, John Hull, who died in 1857. This left Olmsted feeling empty and at loss of what to do. That was when Calvert Vaux came and filled the space in Olmsted’s life that his brother left. Vaux convinced Olmsted to enter the Central Park Commissioner’s design competition with their design entitled the “Greensward Plan.” With the success in that project, Olmsted figured out what he wanted to do with the rest of his life, which was to become a landscape architect. Olmsted practiced from the years of 1857 up until he retired in 1895. Olmsted’s two boys, adopted son John Charles and biological son Frederick La...
3 In the Nature of Materials, 1887-1941: The Buildings of Frank Lloyd Wright (Da Capo Paperback) by Henry Russell Hitchcock Da Capo Press (June 1975)
It appears that from the very beginning, Frank Lloyd Wright was destined by fate or determination to be one of the most celebrated architects of the twentieth century. Not only did Wright possess genius skills in the spatial cognition, his approach to architecture through geometric manipulation demonstrates one aspect of his creativeness. Forever a great businessman, Wright seemed to know how to please his clients and still produce some of the most innovative and ridiculed buildings of the early century. While the United States appeared to be caught up in the Victorian style, Frank Lloyd Wright stepped out in front to face the challenge of creating "American architecture" which would reflect the lives of the rapidly growing population of the Midwest United States. Howard Gardner in his book "Creating Minds" does not make any mention of Frank Lloyd Wright, an innovator who drastically influenced architecture of the twentieth century around the world.
It will discuss the different types of dwellings throughout recorded human history from the perspective of how art and culture influences building design. This will fulfill my own curiosity to understand the different influences on homebuilding and design over the years and how people have dealt with these changes.
The roof was concave down. The roof was built using a built-up spray-on process that Paul Rudolph had seen used to cocoon during his military time in the US Navy. What’s more, Rudolph used wooden jalousie windows, which enabled the characteristic breezes to and from the Sarasota Bay to flow through the house. A student project studied at Harvard under Walter Gropius, later restudied and developed for a client. “The principles at that time were: 1 clarity of construction, 2 simple overall volumes penetrating vertically and horizontally, 3 clear geometry floating above the landscape, 4 everything reduced to simple rectangulars and, of course, 5 a flat roof.” The Bauhaus principles via Harvard were adapted to Florida’s particular
Benson, Tom. "Overview of the Wright Brothers' Invention Process." Re-Living the Wright Way -- NASA, 12 June 2014, wright.nasa.gov/overview.htm. Accessed 22 Nov. 2016.
Wright designed Fallingwater in 1935. The design of the house promotes a harmony between man and nature, so that the buildings, walls and structures within the house are extensions of the exterior world. Fallingwater was designed for the Edgar J. Kaufmann family of Pittsburgh; the founders of a prominent department store in the city called Kaufmann’s. Construction on the project began in 1936 and was completed in 1939. Wright concentrated in on the Bear Run location because he knew of a waterfall in the area that the family loved to go visit all the time. In designing the house, Wright mimicked the natural pattern of rock ledges over the waterfall and cantilevered the house over the falls in a series of concrete ledges, anchored to masonry walls made of the same sandstone as the rock ledges. This view just described, is perhaps the most famous of all. The house hovers right over the rushing mountain stream in perfect harmony. The house extends 30 feet in height above the ledges, although strong horizontal lines and low ceilings help maintain an overall sheltering feeling.
In the spring of 1893 Wright decided to build his own house in Oak Park, Illinois. Taking six years to build, Wright was free to experiment with his objectives in residential architecture over the next twenty-year period. Designing and re-constructing his buildings was a continuous process. He always changed his designs. For twenty years this home served as an independent labatory for Wright. This too went under constant changes. Rooms were enlarged or added, ceilings heightened, the arrangement of the windows changed, and the entry route into the house was modified. Wright even allowed the growth of a willow tree to be uninterrupted by placing a hold in the roof of the studio.
According to Appleton, as humans intuitively are equipped with sensitivity to dangerous situation for survival, source of thrill is found while experiencing individual’s ability to handle danger, termed as peril by Hildebrand. Perilous architecture is typical of much of Wright’s work, particularly on his iconic Fallingwater (Figure 5. In Pennsylvania, 1936). This residence comprises of an abundance of refuge and prospect symbols, through the archetypal features of penetrability and protection such as overhanging eaves, balconies and stoned cave-like rooms. Perhaps due to the prior awareness of its exterior and the audible falling water which is not visible to the eye, the levitating platform is dramatically poised over danger of falling to the ravine and falls below. McCarter agrees that such peril setting intensifies the haven of safety through human sensitivity to aquatic hazard. He takes this further by citing Dewey’s counterpoint of sensory reception between vision and hearing:
In conclusion, Wright had successfully break through his vision of destructing a rigid boxy style of 19th century architecture and refined his idea of what a house should look like; to be in a harmony with nature. As been described earlier, with plenty of technical problems, he acknowledged young architects; even a house needs constant attentions (Stungo, N., 1999). Wright’s ideal of bringing human closer to the nature had inspired many architects until today, Wright to his students “Falling water is one of the great blessing to be experienced”. In point of fact, admirers of him never stop praised of his works; Cliff Hickman passionately said “I had never before seen anything so beautiful … Over and over I came back to look at the photograph of Fallingwater, the most illustrious of all Frank Lloyd Wright architectural masterpieces” (Hickman, C., n.d).
Frank Lloyd Wright and Le Corbusier are two very prominent names in the field of architecture. Both architects had different ideas concerning the relationship between humans and the environment. Their architectural styles were a reflection of how each could facilitate the person and the physical environment. Frank Lloyd Wright’s Robie House, is considered one of the most important buildings in the history of American architecture and Le Corbusier s Villa Savoye helped define the progression that modern architecture was to take in the 20th Century. Both men are very fascinating and have strongly influenced my personal taste for modern architecture. Although Wright and Corbusier each had different views on how to design a house, they also had similar beliefs. This paper is a comparison of Frank Lloyd Wright‘s and Le Corbusier ‘s viewpoints exhibited through their two prominent houses, Frank Lloyd Wright’s Robie House and Le Corbusier’s Villa Savoye.