More handpicked essays just for you.
Socio economic status and academic achievement
Racially biased standardized tests
Perceived Effect Of Social - Economic Status On Educational Attainment Of Pupils
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socio economic status and academic achievement
I argue that race should be taken into account along with other experience in college admissions because a student's skin color should not be the only factor being considered for being accepted. If college admission does not look deeper into the applicant and base it on race it can impact them for the rest of their life and can ruin their educational career. Many non-white students have big dreams and goals but cannot accomplish them because they are denied from colleges because of their skin tone. This can also affect many to drop interest in the career field since many are white dominated and they do not want to be involved on being discriminated. As the college take these factors into encounter it helps the disadvantaged students go to college. It can help the disadvantaged because their grades and test scores are lower because they come from a minority group where their parent’s income is low, which they chose a home in a neighborhood that they can afford. This can lead to having their children to go to a school that has less funding, therefore they would lack in preparation and end up having low grades and low standardization test scores. …show more content…
Just because a student is black does not mean they are low skilled or uneducated because as mentioned in the court case black people also lived in white neighborhoods. White people can also come from a low-income family. I think standardized testing is biased because of the achievement gap, which whites have more access to resources while many other races do not have that opportunity. This includes schools with money do better because of the education they are providing to their students. This can also lead to the fact that many students are horrible in test taking, but are really passionate and involved in extracurriculars in
I do not believe that students are accepted to college based on their skin color being white, with that being said I do believe that there is a fair process for accepting college students to schools. The numbers of white student to minority students may be very different, but I do not believe that has to do with a raciest selection of a student body. Acceptance to any college should be based off experience and how well you did in high school and none of that is determined by the color of anyone’s
people agree with the state that Liz borrows from Thomas Jefferson, "Everybody should have an education proportional to their life,"(Addison 256). Unfortunately, the average income between rich and poor in America is not accurate, everyone supposed to become somebody in life; college gives opportunity to everyone who wants to do so, to become whatever they want, and at any age with a low cost. as much as the income level between rich and poor in America stays unbalanced; college will always be there to gives opportunity to people who want to learn, but cannot afford to attend university. Liz Addison points out an example in the article. It describes “a college application essay workshop for low-income students” (Addison 256). This is suitable for low-income students, but it doesn’t mention an education at universities. People who go to community college have a lot trouble to find jobs which can allow them to pay their debt after graduate. However, in university you are more likely to find and job and be able to pay your
No one—whether they’re black, white, Asian, Latino, or female—should have their qualifications questioned because of their skin color. Still using affirmative action today causes more problems than it should for minorities and women. Skin color should not be a factor of consideration for anything. Only scores, hard work, and dedication should be used to determine how a person will possibly succeed in college or a job.
The main reason people think that is because many of these students do not have access to the best resources. Many minority students do not live in neighborhoods with the best schools and cannot afford expensive tutoring sessions for the test. Since that has been an issue, there are government funded SHSAT prep courses to help students. In order to be certain that there is no more discrimination, the specialized schools just have to ensure that there are enough resources for all who need them. The SHSAT is the only way to objectively test students. Alternative methods-- including interviews, portfolios, GPAs, and teacher recommendations-- are subjective criteria since the administrators get to know each
Last summer, the Supreme Court ruled against the use of race in the college admissions process in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas. Since then, affirmative action has become a big issue in the media; however, many people still do not even know what affirmative action is. Affirmative action is a policy to prevent discrimination on the basis of “color, religion, sex, or national origin.” Overall, it favors minorities that are often discriminated. It might sound like an excellent policy; however, the use of this policy in the college admissions process is prejudice. In the college admissions process, affirmative action lowers the standards for some races, while raising the standard for other races. For example, an Asian might need a SAT score of 2300 to be considered for admission at a top school such as Yale and a white applicant might need a score of 2100, while an African American or Hispanic only needs a score of 1700. While affirmative action provides equality in the workplace, it has no place in the college admissions process and should, therefore, be abolished and replaced. This type of policy can be repealed completely, replaced with a college admissions process that favors first generation college applicants, or replaced with a policy based on an applicant’s socioeconomic status.
There isn't anything more important to community colleges than the certainty that they can and should provide all qualified people who are looking to be accepted with admittance (Vaughan). The people of the community college represent forty-four percent of all undergraduates and forty-nine percent of students attending college for the first time (David). These students include a lot of minority students, students with a low social standing and the non-standard (age twenty-five and older) student who commonly enters college less academically equipped (David). Most community colleges have made immense advancement in reducing a lot of geographical and economic blockades that have in the past limited college admittance (David). Community colleges are to be expected to present significant support to increasing occupation proficiency in the future as additional workers realize they must continue to improve their ability all the way through their profession (Black). Many people believe, that because these students are less likely to be ready for college, that they have a better chance of failing (Weis). All students should have the right to expand their knowledge through higher education regardless of how they did in high school.
Affirmative action has been a controversial topic ever since it was established in the 1960s to right past wrongs against minority groups, such as African Americans, Hispanics, and women. The goal of affirmative action is to integrate minorities into public institutions, like universities, who have historically been discriminated against in such environments. Proponents claim that it is necessary in order to give minorities representation in these institutions, while opponents say that it is reverse discrimination. Newsweek has a story on this same debate which has hit the nation spotlight once more with a case being brought against the University of Michigan by some white students who claimed that the University’s admissions policies accepted minority students over them, even though they had better grades than the minority students. William Symonds of Business Week, however, thinks that it does not really matter. He claims that minority status is more or less irrelevant in college admissions and that class is the determining factor.
Standardized tests are biased to certain students whether it is race, or even how much money the parent(s) earn. According to Standardized Testing and Its Victims by Alfie Kohn, the tests are a lot easier for children coming from richer communities like Dublin for example, then Cleveland where funding is scarce (Kohn, 2000). It is not just a rich and poor battle it also is a battle with students and regional or language barriers. According to Uyen Zimmerman, my former math instructor from Dublin Coffman, explained English as a second language students interpret asked questions phrased strangely to them differently than a student whose primary language is English. For example, she said there was a question on the ACT that asked a question about folding pizza and an ESL student thought that it meant putting pizza into a folder. Another example is asking students about black ice when students in states such as Hawaii and Louisiana, have never seen or heard of black ice (Zimmerman, 2014). I agree with her completely. All standardized tests are playing with what the creators of the test think is a “standard” and testing all students across America with the exact same questions.
Minority groups are given different criteria to meet when applying to college. This is an attempt to compensate for the hardships many minority groups had to face in history. As examined by Hoover Institution’s Thomas Sowell this advantage benefits minority applicants from middle and upper class backgrounds. As a result of admissions using a zero sum game, which is where one person’s gain is another person’s loss, these preferences hurt some applicants who meet admission standards in unequal numbers (Sacks and Thiel). If this predilection were genuinely meant to redress disadvantages, it would not be given on the basis of ethnicity. Supporters of affirmative action claim that affirmative action advocates diversity. But if diversity were the goal, then
Racial preference has indisputably favored Caucasian males in society. Recently this dynamic has been debated in all aspects of life, including college admission. Racial bias has intruded on the students’ rights to being treated fairly. Admitting students on merit puts the best individuals into the professional environment. A university’s unprejudiced attitude towards race in applicants eliminates biases, empowers universities to harness the full potential of students’ intellect, and gives students an equal chance at admission.
Standardized tests are very common throughout the United States. They are used to measure students’ academic performances in school. These tests vary from state to state in all grade levels. However, these tests are believed to be biased towards those students who come from higher-class neighborhoods, simply because they have more educational resources. “The absence of standards virtually guarantees stratified resources and access to knowledge, based upon income, color of skin, and the community and neighborhood in which one lives” (French, 2003). The resources in the suburban areas differ from those in the urban areas, because of the gap within the difference of incomes. Families living in suburban neighborhoods have a bigger income, which enables them to have more resources than those living in urban neighborhoods. Most educational resources come from taxes, which plays a big part in the gap between urban and suburban neighborhoods.
In order to be competitive in the higher education battleground, some academics believe that it’s essential that universities and colleges give minorities certain plus factors during the admission process. Many universities and colleges throughout the country believe that by instituting some form of affirmative action, the end result will be diversified campus demographics. The type of affirmative action each institution implements is different; however, each has the same goal of increasing minority admissions.
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
However, policy makers argue that it is an unbiased, reliable way to measure academic growth, which in turn helps schools pinpoint in what areas they can improve on. Though, the real controversy remains: those in favor of standardized testing insist the program puts education on a level playing field, students aren't disadvantaged by income, or location, and thus receive the same education as any other student. However, this argument does not take into factor school funding, how much after-school time teachers are willing to give, or outside influences of the community (i.e. inner- city schools with a significant amount of drugs or gangs in the community tend to see higher rates of dropouts compared to schools who don’t). Possibly the strongest argument against standardized education, or would’ve been in the eyes of Komenius at least, studies have shown multiple times that as schools turn more to a uniform method of teaching, the disengagement among students
In my opinion, no I do not believe minorities should have lower admission standards in order to racially balance college populations. That’s not fair to other students who have worked hard to get good grades so they have a better chance of getting accepted into school and it’s not acceptable to make the admission process easier for others just because of race. Students who are minorities may create a mindset and believe they don’t have to try as hard because they have a good chance of getting accepted. Each applicant should have the same admission standards when it comes to applying for college because if not all students have the same standards the concept of equal opportunity is violated. I’m not sure why applications still have a section