Expectancy Theory

723 Words2 Pages

Described by DuBrin, (2013, p. 306), looking at leader’s roles at enhancing motivation more broadly, Jean Houston, an Atlanta based human recourse consultant, says that managers can engage their workers by seeing them, as whole people and courageous conversations that builds trust and sees what is really going on. Expectancy theory is a good starting point to learning how leaders can apply systematic explanations of motivation, for two main reasons. First, the theory is comprehensive: it incorporates and integrates features of other motivation theories, which include goal theory and behavior modification. Second, it offers the leader many guidelines for initiating and sustaining constructive effort from group members. DuBrin (2013, p. 308), …show more content…

315), motivating other is to give recognition and praise can be thought as directly placing a positive reinforcement, that is reinforcing the adequate behavior by giving an award. A strong motivator is recognition because it is a regular human need. DuBrin (2013, p. 316), an outstanding of recognition, which include praise, as a motivator it that it is no cost or low cost yet powerful. Bob Nelson, a reward expert, reminds us that money is important to employees and recognizing others motivates them to elevate his or her performance. It has a huge return on investment in comparison to a cash bonus. DuBrin (2013, p. 318), according to equity theory, employee motivation and satisfaction depend on how properly the employees believe they are treated in comparison to peers. The theory debates that employees have certain beliefs about the outcomes they receive from their jobs, as well as the inputs they invest to obtain these outcomes. This theory has many implications for the leader who attempts to motivate subordinates. No matter how well a program productivity or cost-cutting is, it needs to still provide equitable pay. Also, the leader needs to see that subordinates perceive themselves to receive a fair deal in terms of what they give to and receive from the company. DuBrin (2013, p. 320), effective leaders are good coaches and good coaches are effective …show more content…

The LMX model is helpful for leading to achieve long-term business outcomes. Decribed by DuBrin (2013, p. 291), the leader member exchange model (LMX) propose that leaders develop unique working relationships with group members. Many aspects of the LMX relates more closely to teamwork. Leader-membership exchange has also been researched in relationship to many other aspects of workplace behavior, and published research about LMX continues to expand. Goals are also important for leading a team to achieve long-term outcomes. Another recommendation is described by DuBrin (2013, p. 312). Remember certain goals lead to high performance than do generalized goals. Telling someone, “Do your Best” is a generalized goal. A specific goal would be, “Increase the number of new hires to our management training program to fifteen this summer.” When a person’s goals are harder, the more one accomplishes. It is important to remember that a goal is too difficult, they may lower performance. DuBrin (2013, p. 313), remember that the key principle that goals should be connected to feedback and rewards. The most broadly accepted principle of management is to reward people for reaching

Open Document