Examples Of Corruption In Baseball

In many of today’s sports, there are many concerns about the corruption associated with them. Baseball is the biggest example of corruption. Players in this league use unethical methods to succeed. Methods that include using performance enhancing drugs and match-fixing. In addition, we learn coordination and monitoring ultimately allows corruption to sustain in baseball. When it comes to baseball corruption, there are three major components: bribery, cheating, and lying. To start, bribery is common among international players. Considering, many of these players are smuggled into the United States. These players are able to reach the United States with the aid of smugglers. However, the aid comes with a price. Smugglers typically ask for

The third component of corruption is lying. Match-fixing is the biggest evidence of lying. In match-fixing, players underperform intentionally to lose a game. Players participate in match fixing due to financial gain, which is also bribery. Cheating, bribery, and lying are different yet, they’re linked. Some players may cheat while others lie. However, all of them are contributing to corruption. Coordination is essential for corruption to be sustainable in baseball. First of all, baseball requires more than one player in most cases. For example, you have one batter who tries to match-fix a game. The problem is the player only gets three hits before he is out. As a result, his effectiveness in the game is limited since he gets limited tries and can get benched. Secondly, higher ups can play an important role in coordination. Considering, they can abuse their position. For example, an team owner can tell his team to lose games intentionally in order to get a higher pick in the draft. Being that an owner has an extreme amount of financial resources, he can bribe his players to lose games by offering higher salaries. Owners will be willingly to pay these costs because in the long-term it can potentially pay off. Thirdly, laws and contracts help increase coordination. For example, breaking a written code such as a law or contract has consequences. Compared to verbal negotiations with no documents, if people don’t comply, there is little to hold them accountable.

The effectiveness of monitoring correlates with how much or less corrupt is a sport. In baseball, monitoring is inadequate. Incentives, transparency, and doctors contribute to monitoring being ineffective. To start off, higher incentives such as winning can lead to teams concealing the use of PEDs among their players. For instance, if the White Sox's players have an unfair advantage, it increases their chances of winning. Transparency of data is another factor of monitoring. Examining running, they have hidden cameras and an active community that track for any signs of cheating. As a result, it’s difficult for corruption to prevail in running. Compared to baseball, that’s a completely different scenario. In baseball, there’s limited data to check if players are cheating. Another component of monitoring is doctors. They are the people who test players to ensure they aren’t using any drugs. However, doctors can teach players how to avoid testing positive or falsely report their drug