We all make mistakes in life and in business. Thankfully, honest mistakes are often not the impetus towards professional destruction. That typically comes when integrity is lacking. As Warren Buffet once said, “Look for three things (in an effective leader): intelligence, energy and integrity. If they don’t have the last one, don’t even bother.” Statistics have backed up Mr. Buffet’s statement and reveal quantifying data, which proves the correlation between a leader’s integrity and their success. Dr. Fred Kiel author of the book “Return on Character” collected data on 84 CEOs. He looked at the affect behavior had on company performance. He found a multi-year return rate of 9.4% in high-integrity CEOs, while CEOs that were less honest and …show more content…
This person refuses to fire employees who aren’t pulling their weight for whatever reason. Of course, letting someone go is never fun. However, sometimes it needs to happen, and it’s up to the leader to complete the unpleasant task. When a leader wants to avoid conflict at all cost, they end up putting the whole company in jeopardy. Remember, it’s okay to be compassionate, just don’t let employees get away with substandard performance for sustained periods of time. Not Communicating: In all relational issues, communication is not only important, it’s crucial. In the business world, this is no less true. However, many leaders neglect communication. They only lecture. They don’t listen. Of course, this isn’t an example of effective communication and the end result is employees never knowing exactly where they stand. A boss who doesn’t communicate will leave employees wondering about their futures at the company and in turn create an atmosphere of uncertainty within the company. They …show more content…
Therefore, they tend to think their day fruitless if they didn’t “create” or “complete” something. To combat this, they sometimes begin micromanaging the employees working under them. This in turn prevents the employees from doing their jobs as they should and upsets the productivity of the company. Theodore Roosevelt once said this about the dangers of micromanaging, “The best leader is the one who has sense enough to pick good men to do what he wants done, and then the self restart to keep from meddling with them while they do it.” Therefore, since they understand the role they play now and refuse to meddle or micromanage, a good leader redefines their personal standard of a good day’s work. They understand their day will look different than when they were on production, but that’s
According to Aristotle, integrity can be defined as the “particular quality men acquire by constantly acting in a particular way”. It is the sense of honesty and rectitude, towards our moral and ethical principles. We’ve discussed at length how compromising integrity can damage our reputation, how people decide to act against integrity for personal benefits, and ultimately cause irreparable damage among followers. So is it really worth compromising integrity for a big paycheck? Is losing reputation worth the money? Throughout the essay, numerous examples of compromised integrity will be discussed focusing on the Aristotelian view of Leadership. The philosopher’s Seven Virtues will ultimately allow us to understand and reach to a conclusion regarding such doubts.
Unethical behavior is a behavior which is not morally correct. When one is encouraged to embrace unethical behavior and actions, they are "trapped." They are psychological in nature, and such traps distort perceptions of what is wrong and what is right. One actually ends up believing that his or her unethical behavior is right and ethical. If one is not aware of their behavior it is hard for them to tell if their behavior is actually acceptable and ethical. Just like in the Stanford Prison Experiment, the volunteer guards adopted to their new roles. Within hours of beginning the prison experiment, some of the guards began to abuse their power and harass prisoners in that experiment. The volunteer guards behaved in a sadistic and brutal manner.
Donald Menzel states that building an organization with integrity requires leading with integrity. One should be able to perform a duty without fear and without favors. Integrity, as Menzel explains, is defined by sound moral character, being respectful, and wholesome. Menzel describes not only what guides integrity, but how to build an organization with integrity over the course of chapter 3 and 4. Menzel begins by defining integrity, how to show integrity, and what integrity looks like among employees, organizations, and professionals. He then discusses the 8 principles of ethical conduct and how managers must act in this manner to demonstrate and lead by example. After defining these terms, Menzel discusses different types of leadership and how to build on each type. Menzel continues, in chapter 4, to discuss tools that organizations can use to in order to build and maintain organizations that display integrity. As Menzel moves into chapter 5, he describes management across different cities and counties and discusses ethical issues that have presented and how each was managed. Menzel continues to use life experiences in these chapters to help demonstrate not only what can happen, but what can happen if the wrong choice is made.
In the two readings, “ The insufficiency of honesty” author Stephan L. Carter and “What isn’t for sale?” by Michael J Sandle, These writings address the two issues in society. One being honesty and the other is giving up morals in order to obtain something. Both of these authors say society is giving up their morals in order to acquire what they want. Society will do anything and forget about honesty and morals. Markets are putting monetary value to items that shouldn’t have monetary value. People give up their morals in order to have these items.
Dr. Sutton highlights what it takes to be a good boss. People that work for a good boss are 20 percent less likely to have a heart attack (Sutton, 2010). Dr. Sutton wrote that teams with stronger leaders cost the company less money and achieved their work better (Sutton, 2010). Engagement and performance of employees were based upon their direct boss and not if the company was good or bad (Sutton, 2010). Most bad bosses have employees who have check-out: actively disengaged, and undermine their co-workers accomplishments. Managers have to find the balance between performance and humanity to be successful. Performance is about doing everything possible to help followers do great work; while humanity is about employees experiencing dignity and pride. Treating managerial work as an endurance race instead of a sprint race with small wins will lead one to becoming a good boss called grit by Sutton. Sutton believes that good bosses walk a constructive line between being assertive and not assertive enough with guidance, wisdom, and feedback that he called Lasorda’s law (Sutton, 2010).
Because the manager in a manufacturing company doesn’t like confrontation, will not pressure the employees to do more than what is necessary to get orders out the door. He is more concerned about befriending the employees rather than increasing the bottom line.
Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom. An old proverb says, “Honesty is the best policy,” but I, however, disagree with that saying. First, sometimes we have to lie to prevent hurt feelings, and sometimes when it comes to that situation it is better to lie than to tell the truth. Second, we have to tell a lie to keep others secrets, or to keep our secrets safe. Last, in order to keep customs and traditions alive, we have to lie too little, whether it is about Santa or the Easter bunny. If we lie about that I do not think it is a big deal. I do not think is it right to lie all of the time, but when it comes to certain situations like to prevent hurt feelings, to keep secrets, or about Santa I think it is okay. As can be seen, an old proverb may say that honesty is the best policy, but, again, I disagree with that.
The term “ethics” refers to an external set of rules that have been established by an institution or organization, for example, a university, and the members are expected to follow them. On the other hand, integrity refers to an individuals’ internal set of principles that guides their actions and behavior (Czimbal and Brooks n.p.). As a rule, people are usually rewarded when they follow ethical codes of conduct by an external committee or board that monitors their behavior. For a person of high integrity, the benefits are usually intrinsic. Moreover, such individuals always make the right decisions even when they are not being watched. Therefore, this feature of character is often influenced by a person’s upbringing. In
For me, integrity is the one of the most important quality a person should have. If a person is not honest to themselves and to the community, she is not willing to include herself to that community. After leaving home, Hollins has become my community. It has given me a safe space to grow and a good number of friends. I have understood the importance of responsibility as a member of this community. When I first signed the honor code, I promised to myself to be honest and follow the University’s policies. So far, I believed that I have fulfilled the promise and wish to do the same in the future. I am responsible, confident and have integrity, therefore, I believe I should be a member of the Honor, Conduct and Appeal board.
Integrity is the quality of being honest. When you are honest about something or a certain situation you are considered a person of integrity. Also when you have integrity you have strong moral principles. When you have strong moral principles you know what is right and what is wrong. “Having integrity means doing the right thing in a reliable way. It's a personality trait that we admire, since it means a person has a moral compass that doesn't waver. It literally means having "wholeness" of character, just as an integer is a "whole number" with no fractions.” Furthermore, having integrity is a quality that many strive to have because it often means that you are a good person.
As you can see, the definition of honesty and integrity go hand in hand. Just as Spencer Johnson tells us, “Integrity is telling myself the truth. And honesty is telling the truth to other people.” Without honesty, there is absolutely no integrity. In the past few years, many major corporations conducted tests to determine how much of the world’s population was considered, “honest.”
4) Why is integrity an important characteristic for a social worker to possess? How will you be certain you act with integrity?
Honesty is a characteristic that everyone should possess. However, being honest is a difficult task for many people. Living honestly means allowing a person’s true self to be exposed to others. Honesty is considered owning up to one’s wrongdoings and not lying, cheating, or stealing. Being honest is a trait that many people believe is obsolete. Even though every person interprets honesty differently, it all stems back to telling the truth. Being honest allows a person to earn respect from their peers. Honesty is allowing oneself to be completely exposed by being truthful.
Moral ethics is the belief that all human beings are born to know right from wrong. We come into this world as good people, but the temptations and challenges in life influence our mind set to as it will. Every person on Earth chooses if they’re to follow through with their life of good or go down the path of bad. “A person’s moral ethics” (unknown.)
Beginning your career with honesty and integrity makes for a great team building skill and can help in create great relationships with your superiors and co workers. I think that honesty and integrity should be demanded in all aspects of life. It helps build character and a respectful personality. When we should that we have