Emily Dickinson Paradox

716 Words2 Pages

Emily Dickinson’s poem, “Success is counted sweetest” ironically explains a part of human nature through establishing a paradox. The paradox presented states that success becomes more tangible and easier to appreciate the further one is from it. The poem creates a complicated metaphor that extends throughout the poem to guide the reader through the process of understanding this idea. The specific implementations of rhyme employed by the poem help connect lines of parallel meaning within this metaphor to allow the reader to fully comprehend such a dynamic claim. Similarly, the poem benefits from the use of various sound devices which establish a tone that is essential to the overall understanding of how the level of appreciation and comprehension of success directly relates to how distant one’s self is from success. In the first example, the poem depicts a group of people that are not particularly far from success (Dickenson 1-2). Here, the …show more content…

Here, the poem re-defines success as quenching one’s thirst through the use of a “nectar” (Dickinson 3-4). Because the character is in such need of this nectar (Dickinson 4), they are likely very distant from reaching it, otherwise, they would have quenched their thirst already. Imagine a glass of water. If you are suffering from extreme thirst, and in “sorest need”, you are likely distant from any source of water that might quench your thirst. Else, you would certainly consume the water. In fact, you would appreciate every drop of water you could possibly find. Now, if you reverse the situation, and have access to all the water in the world, you couldn’t care less about a drop of water. In fact, you might even turn down a glass of water. The level of appreciation greatly depends on one’s relationship to the water and thus greatly depends on how close someone is to

Open Document