Emily Dickinson 160 And 271 Analysis

751 Words2 Pages

Emily Dickinson was known to be one of the best poets in the 19th century as she displayed a unique writing style discussing her experiences and beliefs. Throughout her life, she wrote over one thousand poems with many recurring themes, all tied to religion, nature, and death. Even though the theme of the afterlife is not one of her major topic she wrote about, Dickinson somehow found a way to express her interest in eternity. Poems 160 and 271 show Dickinson portraying a narrator’s desire to live in the afterlife for eternity while questioning if true happiness can be found in that world.
In poem 160, Emily Dickinson introduces the idea of eternity through someone else’s voice. When talking about the world of the dead, people usually fear the idea of this unknown land rather than wishing to be …show more content…

Poem 271 shows the reason for the narrator’s ambition when Dickinson writes, “-that it return- / Eternity – until - / I pondered how the bliss would look.” She uses a delicate word, “bliss”, which can identify as a ‘perfect happiness’ or ‘great joy’ to enlarge the question if they can truly be happy in the afterworld. Going to eternity is the only way they can find out if this true happiness exists. In the same stanza, Dickinson once again mentions the narrator’s interests to reach eternity when she speaks of “Eternity –until-.” While Emily quickly mentions the narrator’s desire, the narrator keeps questioning if eternity really contain this true happiness. “And would it feels as big - / When I could take it in my hand.” Not only is the narrator thinking about what this happiness looks like, but also how it would feel. The word “as” in the sentence make it seem like the narrator already made up what they think is the definition of ‘true happiness’. Now they are hoping the happiness in eternity will look and feel the same if it does

Open Document