What is wrong with rights issues?
Introduction
A rights issue is an issue of rights to purchase new shares, which are issued pro rata to the existing shareholders, Armitage (2007). Rights issues were the dominate form of seasoned equity offers for fund raising in the United Sates and the United Kingdom . However, there has been a swing to other forms of share issues. The US has shifted towards firm commitments, Eckbo and Masulis (1992). In this the underwriter guarantees the sale of the issued stock at the agreed-upon price. The shift in the US occurred in the 1960’s. In the UK there has been a move towards open offers. Open offers are similar to rights issues but investors are unable to sell the stocks that they purchase under the open offer to other parties. The change in the UK occurred much later than the US, with the shift occurring in the 1990’s.
The purpose of this paper is to examine why this shift has occurred, and discover what academics believe to be wrong with rights issues. In order to achieve this goal two papers on the subject will be reviewed. The first paper to be reviewed will be Eckbo and Masulis (1992) and the second will be Armitage (2007). Once both papers are reviewed there will be a conclusion which will compare the two and conclude on their main contribution to knowledge.
Eckbo and Masulis (1992)
Background
Eckbo and Masulis (1992) open their paper by explaining the decline in rights issues and the surge in firm commitments. To show this Eckbo and Masulis use a sample of 1,249 equity offers between 1963-1981.
Eckbo and Masulis highlight the puzzle Smith (1977) presents. Smith finds that rights issues have lower costs than firm-commitments. Smith also states that the rights issuer can assure the success ...
... middle of paper ...
... that selling large blocks of shares plus rights is rather costly and means the apparent cost advantage of rights issue is illusory. The cost of selling new shares plus rights has not previously been documented as a material cost in rights issues.
Both the papers are credible in their own right and provide answers for the decline in rights issues. Eckbo and Masulis (1992) is more credible for US markets and Armitage (2007) is more credible for the UK markets. However, Armitage (2007) may be the more credible paper as it finds the long run abnormal returns following rights issues with pre-renounced shares are not consistently negative or significant, which would suggest the issuers were fairly valued. This finding slightly disproves Eckbo and Masulis (1992) abnormal return results and over/under valuation theory but Eckbo and Masulis (1992) sample is much greater.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the article called “Can We Keep Our Promises?” by Robert D. Arnott, and to help better understand the three key risks facing each investor.
Gaughan, P. A., 2002. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate restructuring. 3rd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? N.p., n.d. Web. The Web.
...ng the two examples used in this study were mainly from IT industry, and took place in the era of IT stocks at their peak, from the late 1990s to early 2000s. The examples that have been discussed throughout the study, the spin of 3Com/Palm, and Ubid/Creative are some of the most extreme cases of mispricing that the market has ever observed.
Introduction One of the main reasons why human rights have been put in place is to protect the public life and public space of every individual being. One fundamental characteristic of human rights is that they are equal rights; they are aimed at providing protection to every person in an equal way. These rights have been entrenched through laws that are passed by states and international conventions. Human rights laws have evolved over time, and have been shaped by several factors, including philosophical theories in the past. This paper looks at the theories of two philosophers, Emmanuel Kant and John Stuart Mills, and how their teachings can be used to explain the sources of human rights.
The Body Shop International case is an interesting case study into the miscommunication of owners and stockholder interests with regard to financial conditions. Anita Roddick, the founder of The Body Shop had no financial experience and thought that all she needed to do was expand her business and the financing would take shape as she developed her business. While Anita’s product concept of a natural skin-care line was good; her lack of experience in financial matters took its toll on her business.
Week 5 Lecture. (2006). FIN 325 Mergers, Acquisitions, and International Finance. Retrieved from rEsource on July 7th, 2006 from https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/resource.asp
Loos, N. (2006). Value creation in leveraged buyouts: Analysis of factors driving private equity investment performance. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts Verlag.
Acquisitions can be very taxing on both the buyer and the seller during periods of negotiation through development of a binding contract: each wanting different terms and conditions. Neither understands the emotions behind the potential risks involved for both parties.
Float Shares in the Market Place – Floating shares can be identified simply as the shares of a public entity that are available for trading in a stock market. An advantage of this source of funds is that the entity gets access to new capital that can be used in developing the business. Although its disadvantage is that the shareholders’ interests may differ from the company’s interest or objective.
Using equity as a source of finance would mean that Barra Airways would be increasing the level of shareholder accountability it currently has. In the future, Barra Airways may find that in the future its freedom to make conduct business freely is hindered, if it issues more equity. The legal action taken by shareholders against companies has risen substantially since 1996 [7]. If this trend continues into the future then the likelihood of Barra Airways experiencing shareholder activism is significant.
D'Souza, Annabelle . "Technology Advances Leading to the Diminishing of Private Rights." Georgia Law. N.p., 1 Mar. 2003. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
There has been a drive towards corporate governance which has been driven by a greater need for shareholder protection. If investors feel well cushioned then there is a higher chance that t...
Zachariassen, F., & Arlbjørn, J. (2011). Exploring a differentiated approach to total cost of ownership. Industrial Management & Data Systems , 111 (3), 448-469.
If the disinvestment policy is to be in wider public interests, it is necessary to examine systematically, issues such as - the correct valuation of shares, the crowding out possibility, the appropriate use of disinvestment proceeds and the institutional and other prerequisites.