Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drones in counter terrorism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Drones in counter terrorism
There are many things in the world that we as humans do not like or understand. We do not understand why somethings happen or even exist, but they are there. One of the terrible things in our daily lives include terrorists. We don't normally understand their reasoning's, but they still happen and there is nothing we can do about it...or is there. Yes there is, and the "tool" that has been made for our seeking, and tracking of terrorist is called drone striking. Drone striking is an effective way of eliminating terrorists because of minimal U.S. losses, the physical act of drone striking, and the aftermath of drone striking. My three main objectives are American Safety, the act of Drone Striking, and the aftermath of Drone Striking. American …show more content…
This can lower military costs that can go towards other parts of our nation for example education, or paying of the billions of dollars owed in debts. The budgeted price was 2.9 billion total for drone striking, and the U.S. is spending roughly $8 million per day on military to supply the military with the jobs that a drone strike can do. This is similar to the 13-year war with Afghanistan, so paying the military for 13 years would equal to $37,960,000,000 instead of the $8,000,000(Freidman). There is one obvious choice to save money and that would be drone striking. There is also an issue of civilian deaths. There have been nearly 2,500 killed people in Pakistan, about 450 civilians died. That’s roughly 17 percent of them civilians (Saletan). If you look in the big picture 17% is not nearly as terrible as it could be. What would be the solution if drone strikes were eliminated, The only example I can think of is going back to nuclear bombing and bombing cities and not being as accurate? In Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there were upwards of 100,000 civilian deaths, so the number is miniscule compared to a previous bombing battle that we ,the United States of America, have fought in. The Aftermath of Drone Striking is far less than of an atomic bomb. There is very limited surrounding damage except for the actual building that is being targeted. This lets the urban warfare come more at ease because there will be less catastrophic damage
One of the benefits of the Drone is preserving U.S. life. Drones can now replace surveillance missions inside enemy territory without risking the pilots capture and death. Drones are able to slip across borders without risking lives of pilots. They can linger in foreign countries and scout potential threats for a long period of time. They can then decide when to strike the target with minimal civilian casualties. (E-IR) Drones are also able to strike a target with better targeting strategies due to the pilot being removed from the cockpit. (E-IR) Besides the capability for a drone to just hunt down a ...
Pakistan? There is also Al Qaeda operatives working in the Arabian Peninsula as well, and is
Controversy has plagued America’s presence in the Middle East and America’s usage of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) contributes vastly to this controversy. Their usefulness and ability to keep allied troops out of harm’s reach is hardly disputed. However, their presence in countries that are not at war with America, such as Pakistan and Yemen, is something contested. People that see the implications of drone use are paying special attention to the civilian casualty count, world perspective, and the legality of drone operations in non-combative states. The use of drone technology in the countries of Yemen and Pakistan are having negative consequences. In a broad spectrum, unconsented drone strikes are illegal according to the laws of armed conflict, unethical, and are imposing a moral obligation upon those who use them. These issues are all of great importance and need to be addressed. Their legality is also something of great importance and begins with abiding to the Laws of Armed Conflict.
Byman’s first argument is that US drone strikes are extremely efficient in their purpose: eliminating high value targets in foreign countries that pose a threat to national security. He cities a study done by the New America Foundation, which found that “U.S. drones have killed an estimated 3,300 al Qaeda, Taliban, and other jihadist operatives in Pakistan and Yemen” (Byman 1). Of these 3,300 militants, over 50 were senior leaders of either Al Qaeda or the Taliban. Additionally, drone strikes indirectly hinder communication between terrorist leaders and their operatives. In an effort to avoid detection, many foreign militants have stopped using cell phones and other electronic forms of communication. Although the elimination of technology makes it harder to find high value targets, it also significantly impacts their ability to communicate, which reduces the amount of organized attacks. Without considering the cost of civilian casualties or other negative impacts associated with the drone strikes, it is clear that UAV drones have been effective in eliminating foreign threats.
First of all both authors agree that drone strikes cause casualties among civilians. They agree that drones can cause harm among civilians as far as drones hovering above for days or weeks at a time and that; that causes fear, paranoia, and mental health problems for civilians. But where they
It’s important to acknowledge that yes, drone strikes have brought about a completely different type of warfare, one which the original thinkers behind just war theory probably could not fathom. As put by Yemeni activist Farea al-Muslimi, “When there is a normal war, people can hide, or they can stay away from the military – they can make choices and be careful, but when drones come, you just don’t know when you’ll be next. The fear is incredible.” Drone usage comes at a great cost; the psychological effect of constantly being on guard on Yemen’s civilians are perhaps a new aspect of war that should be considered when considering the behaviors considered ‘just’ during
The moment I received the prompt to explore just war theory, the first controversial topic containing strong arguments on both sides that interested me was that of drone warfare. As tensions rise between countries and technology improves, the possibility of advanced warfare among nations seems imminent as drones are deployed in replacement of soldiers. The purposes of these unmanned drones in present day are primarily intel collection and target acquisition, which usually leads to extermination of known and presumed threats to the dispatcher. In the United States, when it comes to the topic of using drones within foreign countries, most of the citizens will agree that it is an efficient way to remotely deal with immediate threats to the country.
Drones are cheaper and more effective than putting boots on the ground. According to Brooking.edu, “Over 50 senior leaders of al Qaeda and the Taliban who are not easily replaced…” have been killed by drone strikes. Another 3,250 al Qaeda, Taliban, and Jihadist operatives have also been killed by drone strikes. They are also worthy to be used for the reason that they are cheaper than manned aircraft attacks and U.S. military attacks. U.S. manned aircraft attacks cost $16,900 per hour to operate while drones cost about $3,679 per hour to operate. You might think that's a lot of money, but it cost $2.1 million per year for each soldier deployed in Afghanistan.
In this day and age the face of warfare has changed completely. The implementation of drone warfare to the modern day military doctrine has been a strong point of controversy since its origins. One of the biggest controversies facing drone is the killing of unarmed civilians across the Middle East. Unmanned: Americas Drone Wars is a documentary focusing on targets, or should I say murders of innocent civilians throughout Pakistan. The documentary steps through first hand accounts on both ends of the spectrum, drone pilot and drone victims. The major point that is examined, is the United States wrong in using drone warfare, is controversial just like any other thing in American politics and warfare.
Military corporations have invented these violent helicopter like devices, they call drones, to hover thousands of feet in the air to target, spy, and kill potential terrorists. This might sound like a commendable idea, but it can actually be quite dangerous to innocent people. There should be strict regulations regarding the use of drone attacks. Drones might be acceptable for some situations, but to have billions of dollars invested in building and sending them out just to have accidently killed millions of lawful citizens is not what most people call justice.
The United States has become increasingly dependent upon drones to carryout not only surveillance but warfare altogether. According to Peter Bergman and Katherine Tiedemann
One of the latest and most controversial topics that has risen over the past five to ten years is whether or not drones should be used as a means of war, surveillance, and delivery systems. Common misconceptions usually lead to people’s opposition to the use of drones; which is the reason it is important for people to know the facts about how and why they are used. Wartime capabilities will provide for less casualties and more effective strikes. New delivery and surveillance systems in Africa, the United Air Emirates and the United States will cut costs and increase efficiency across the board. Rules and regulations on drones may be difficult to enforce, but will not be impossible to achieve. The use of drones as weapons of war and delivery and surveillance systems should not be dismissed because many people do not realize the real capabilities of drones and how they can be used to better the world through efficient air strikes, faster delivery times, and useful surveillance.
A lot of countries all over the world depend on technological advances to fight against their opponents. This reduced the risk of having a soldier wounded or dying in a war by making it easier with using these technologies when it comes to head to head combat. Even though using technologies are a great idea but many ethical issues arise from it. One of the main issue is the use of these Drones. This technology is developing more and more. In a recent study showed that there are over 700 active drone development all over the world and these programs are controlled under companies, research institutes, and the government. United States is mainly using these drones to fight against so called “terrorist” but some other countries use them as well. It is immoral and unethical to use these drones because it cause psychological disorders, violate privacy, cause deaths of innocent lives, and increase terrorism. (Reardon)
Living in the digital age where we enjoy the various fruits of latest technological tools and advancements, then at the same time we cannot escape from their hidden or apparent harms. Also, it is a fact that some gadgets supported by these technological advancements are much capable to bring destruction and disaster then construction and convenience. The same goes for the Drone Technology which since past 200 years is being used to create turbulence at the global level. It has proved to be a powerful investigator and bomber at the same time. Drones are specifically associated with military actions and the countries having used them for surveillance purposes include UK, USA, Italy, Japan, Austria, Australia etc. The list of victim counties or nations is much bigger in contrast. Some prominent victims of Drone Air Strikes include Congo, Venice, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. However, it is also an undeniable fact that the massive production and usage of Drones got multiplied in the 21st century.
Drones will help reduce cost of funding the military. Drones will replace different types of supplies and weapons. There will no longer be a need many military tanks. With the money that the government saved on the army, the government could use that money more useful things that can benefit the future of the country in a good way.