Don Quixote Close Reading Analysis

666 Words2 Pages

Don Quixote Close Reading The second part of the novel begins by Don Quixote expressing his frustrations with the author who published a fake sequel to the second part of his narrative. Don Quixote claims he does not want to malign the dishonest author, Avellaneda. However, Quixote is contradicting himself because he goes on ranting about how this counterfeit author should “hide his name and conceal his birthplace, as if he had committed some terrible act of treason against the crown” (Cervantes 456). Don Quixote then tells an anecdote about a madman who represents the deceptive author, effectively conveying his frustration with the plagiarist. However, one wonders why Cervantes included the tale of Avellaneda in his novel. Was it to belittle the deceitful author, to address his literary critics, or to create a metafictional world, that blurs the lines between fiction and fantasy? Cervantes’s makes the comparison that Avellandea thinks writing a great novel is as difficult as blowing up a dog with a tube. When describing what the madman did to dogs Cervantes …show more content…

And then he would catch a dog on the street, or somewhere else, hold down one of its hind legs with his foot, lift the other with his hand, fit the tube into the right place, and blow until he made the animal as round as a ball, and then, holding it up, he would give the dog two little pats on the belly and let it go, saying to the onlooker, and there were always a good number of them: ‘Now do your grace think it’s an easy job to blow up a dog?’” (Cervantes 456) Cervantes describes how hard it is to blow up a dog, inferring how hard it is to write a novel. The passage where he is listing the steps in torturing the dog is one long sentence giving off the tone of how lengthy and difficult the process is. Cervantes tells the reader that if Avellaneda does not believe that story then he has another one to tell, which is even more

Open Document