DNA Database Is NOT Ethical

827 Words2 Pages

As defined by Merriam Webster, safety is the condition of being protected from danger, risk, or injury. The desire for safety, and the lack of it are powerful motivators. This fear is currently being manipulated to attempt to convince the public that a national DNA database should be instituted. The attempt to institute this database is unethical, impractical, and fiscally irresponsible. Any attempt to enact a mandatory DNA database is illegal, as the current precedent for the forced collection of DNA clearly states that either consent, or a warrant is required. The Fourth amendment states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” …show more content…

Though people may believe that someone simply knowing their genetic code would not be that detrimental, there are many applications of the information contained within your cells. One major example of such possible abuse would be insurance companies. If they obtain access to that information, whether through legal or illegal means, they can begin to deny coverage to people based on preexisting conditions that they have not even developed. Perfectly healthy people with a predisposition to developing cancer would likely be denied coverage due to the potential risk to the insurance company. Information such as this never stays protected for long, because there is always someone who wants to use it for personal gain. …show more content…

By forcing this system upon us we treat upstanding citizens no different than criminals. This system assumes guilt on the part of the people before the crime of which they are guilty has even been committed. We say that our justices system is based on the principle that you remain innocent until proven otherwise, so how could we allow a system such as this to remove our right to be treated innocently until we have been proven otherwise. Not only is it unconstitutional and unsecure, it is also impractical. It’s goal is to solve more crime using DNA evidence. According to a report released by England’s parliament, only 0.3 percent of crimes are actually solved using DNA evidence.With such low rates of effectiveness and such a high cost, not only fiscally but in regards to our liberties and securities as well, there is no reason this futile and ultimately detrimental system upon

Open Document