Critical Analysis Of Mimi Abramovitz's Social Work Theory

1106 Words3 Pages

In the article, “Social Work and Social Reform: An Arena of Struggle” Abramovitz analysis and acknowledges the social work profession and the barriers throughout its existence. M. Abramovitz addresses the significance of social work in the history of activism in the 20th century and the interference to social reform and political prevalence of the profession. The author Mimi Abramovitz has a firm belief that the struggle with social work is the relationship between social work and social reform. This relationship reflects the internal and external politics involved with social work. Social workers have to choose between the individual struggles and society rules. In choosing to help people with programs or challenging the existing state …show more content…

This allowed social workers to expand their knowledge base of psychoanalytical skills. The political climate has changed with social work throughout the years, social workers used to believe if people had a higher standard of living it would end poverty. However, when the economy was in extreme stress, it created a need for individuals and community reform. In the 1960’s economic inequality still existed and in the 1970’s political influenced social change. Political influence started with President Ronald Regan and continued with President George Bush and Bill Clinton. Regan cutback government funding these made social workers rely on private-sectors to fund their agenda for social problems. Clinton also placed pressure on nonprofits agencies and corporations to help fund the programs to address poverty. Social reform advanced even during these time frame regardless of funding, and new social issues regarding the drugs …show more content…

Social work pursues to meet the demands and addresses the changing profession of fighting for human rights, improving social policies, and practice. I agree with the Abramovitz article that we have to know and understand the history of the social work profession. If people go without learning and comprehending the past, people cannot make accommodations for the future. Knowledge of the past will keep history alive, it will guide workers and their efforts to reform. The past also helps society in understanding programs that did not work. Society needs to understand the values that historical knowledge can bring positive changes in the future. Advocates for early social workers and their issues and concerns are still relevant in today's

Open Document