Critical Analysis Of Ken Robinson's Speech

711 Words2 Pages

When I first viewed Ken Robinson’s speech, he presented the idea that education needs to change, and to adapt to the person being taught. Ken supported his evidence by using the rhetoric of logos (Logic), ethos (Credibility), and pathos (Persuasion). In addition, to squandering our resources we are squandering our skills as well. Furthermore, he declares that we need a revolution, all standardized testing needs to be tailored to the individual, and he makes the comparison between that of a fast food chain and restaurant. Life is organic, constantly changing ever growing, all at different rates. I deem that his use of pathos in the speech, to be the highest of the three. The following is a critical analysis of the evidence, credibility, and …show more content…

The speaker eloquently conveyed his information to the audience. His logos greatly rose when he started to quote Abraham Lincoln. This is true for most people in our day, I see many people doing jobs they neither care for nor like to do. Also, to sum what he related to Lincoln’s speech he said, we must disenthrall ourselves with the living in the past… and continue learning what in our future. Moreover, he uses the analogy of industrial and agriculture to further convey his understanding to the audience. I do agree with his use of pathos, I felt as if his speech could have been more informative, yes, he uses logos and ethos in his speech. Yes, I agree that this speech was intended specifically for the TED audience. From what I’ve seen and understood the TED audience seemed to love his speech as did I. The use of rhetoric is the ability to see the available means in a given situation, and that is what Ken did for the indented …show more content…

This subject is relevant to the audience who are in their early twenties to thirties, Ken makes his main statement to the audience when he declares: Our educational systems need to be more tailored to the student, instead of the student catering to the system. When Ken spoke the audience’s reactions were as that of little kids on Christmas day, they were highly receptive to what he said. He used a personal story to further their interest to his topic, he told a story about a fireman he met at the bookstore. The fireman talked about how when he was in high school his teacher told him that he should be something rather than a fireman the teacher made fun of his student.. Six months after the student became a fireman he ended saving his teachers life. Children have ideals, and we should be careful to tread lightly on

Open Document