Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Literary Analysis Conflict arises in several aspects of life. We often have conflicts with ourselves, with other people, and even with nature. These three main conflicts, which bring Louie to redemption are seen in Hillenbrand’s Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption. These conflicts are between the man and nature, Louie and the Bird, and the internal conflict as Louie struggles with alcoholism One conflict seen in Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption is the conflict between man and nature, which Louie, Phil, and Mac faced while lost at sea. As the men spent countless days at sea their points of view about the situation “were becoming self- fulfilling” (Hillenbrand 155). The
The abundant animal imagery in Timothy Findley's book The Wars is used to develop characterization and theme. The protagonist, Robert Ross, has a deep connection with animals that reflects his personality and the situations that he faces. This link between Robert and the animals shows the reader that human nature is not much different than animal nature.
Laura Hillenbrand’s novel Unbroken incorporates the improbable life of the main character, Louie Zamperini. She introduces both the inspiring and powerful journey that Louie encounters in his life as he grows up. Hillenbrand looks to and successfully does catch the versatility of the human soul. Zamperini’s story including his involvement in World War II gives a persuasive stage in which the author demonstrates numerous qualities of Louie. Leaving readers to appreciate his courage, quality, grit and above all else, his bravery. “Confident that he was clever resourceful, and bold enough to escape any predicament, [Louie] was almost incapable of discouragement. When history carried him into war, this resilient optimism would define him.” Louie
It reveals that Louie is trying hard to become a better person and excel in life.
In Vonnegut's novel, Galapagos, the narrator, Leon Trout, attempts to understand humanity's cruelty after witnessing the Vietnam War's brutality and lack of purpose. As a marine in "...a nearly endless, thankless, horrifying, and, finally, pointless war..." (Galapagos 254), Trout struggles to come to terms w...
“As the weeks passed, the Bird didn’t relent in his attacks on Louie, the corporal sprang upon him randomly, pounding his face and head. Any resistance from Louie, even shielding his face, would inspire the Bird to more violence.”. (p. 251)
Rhetorical analysis is utilized throughout the novella to assert Johnson’s main message of the beauty and danger of nature. Nature is only able to accept man when man complies with nature’s laws. Although nature’s spoils must be utilized to ensure survival in the desirous wild, it is not always accepting of man’s measures for survival: “It was only when you left it alone that a tree might consider you a friend. After the blade bit in, you had yourself a war” (14-15). The use of personification in this quote helps the reader to identify nature’s menace. By using the word “war”, Johnson signifies the impending doom that some men face once they challenge nature’s concrete laws.
The most readily apparent similarity between the two is that both render their captive immobile; the bird and the African- American are confined. Beyond this immobility, more telling commonalities appear vis-à-vis the nature of the captives. Dunbar’s captive is the bird, and the nature of a bird is to fly. While the bird retains its intrinsic ability to fly – its aerodynamic anatomy remains – the surrounding cage prevents it from externalizing its intrinsic inclination. Hence, the bird’s anguish follows from the suppression of its natural tendency.
Due to Louis’ discipline and quick-thinking, they lasted 47 days on the raft surviving shark-infested waters and Japanese bombers flying overhead. A new challenge begins when Louis is picked up by the Japanese and put in a prisoner of war (POW) camp where he is beaten, starved and humiliated. The Bird, the leader of the camp, got pleasure out of seeing Louis suffer and often ordered the guards to subject him to dehumanizing treatments. Louis’ life was even tied to that of an animal to humiliate and degrade him; he was made to care for a goat and was told “Goat die, you die” (Unbroken). This shows the human to the animal behavior of superiority, the act of “survival of the fittest.” By dehumanizing Louis, The Bird felt more powerful, i.e. more fit, and Louis struggles to survive while his hope of the war ending and being rescued
In H.G. Wells War of the Worlds the humans’ instinct to survive overcomes threats to their existence.
How an individual reacts when faced with conflict can say a lot about their character. Some would say a lot about their character. Some would say ‘the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph’ but that is not always the case as demonstrated in texts. The play ‘Twelve Angry Men’ by playwright Reginald Rose and the film ‘On The Waterfront’ by director Elia Kazan. Rose and Kazan demonstrate the repercussions of conflict in both a positive and negative way through a verity of characters. Primarily, the path to triumph can be dependent on the views and values of the individual. Also, when surrounded by stereotyped views and fear, conflict can result in further issues when striving for triumph. Lastly, oppression of a society and inequality
“It began over a chore Louie’s father asked him to do. Louie resisted, a spat ensued, and Louie threw clothes into a bag and stormed towards the front door. His parents ordered him to stay; Louie was beyond persuasion.” (15) He couldn’t take it any longer because all he did was run since Pete forced him to do so. Louie is respire, he wants to take a break. Furthermore, this is apart of his personality as he refused to listen to his parents. “The Bird demanded that Louie looks him in the eyes; Louie wouldn’t do it. The Bird tried to knock Louie down; Louie wouldn’t fall.” (181) “The Bird” was sadistic. Therefore, this explains of this character trait because he disobeyed when the bird demanded him to look at him in the eyes. “Other prisoners told him to give in or the Bird would beat him to death. Louie couldn’t do it.” (181) When he was held captive of war and “The Bird” was harangued. Consequently, this character trait because he ignored the other prisoners when they told him to give in or else the bird would beat him to death. If Louie was never rebellious his life would probably have been completely different.
The characters also are involved in the belief of the anti-transcendental philosophy. The story shows how each character acts with nature and each other. Many of the whalers must protect the boat and each other as they trek through the wild tides and horrible weather conditions. They try their hardest to fight these conditions, but sadly the narrator is the only survivor. These men exemplify the philosophy by fighting the animals; especially the whales ...
They are forced to contend with the realization that their survival does not matter to nature. The correspondent comes to the realization, “When it occurs to a man that nature does not regard him as important, and that she feels she would not maim the universe by disposing of him, he first wishes to throw bricks at the temple, and he hates deeply the fact that there are no bricks and no temples” (Crane 213). While the men may try to pin their trouble on the “mythicized deity,” that really does not serve them. When discussing this, Hilfer says, “The discomfiting thing about nature is that though we can address it, our messages can only come back stamped ‘return to sender’” (251). No matter how much the men in the boat try to make sense of what is happening to them, they cannot find the being or force behind
Living creatures of all species in their most natural state have one purpose: to survive. Humans are certainly no exception to this rule. However, human kind has a unique trait that acts as a means for survival even in the face of great adversity; the human spirit. Humans have a natural inclination to survive, but the higher component of human nature uses that inclination to help humans survive (whether it be emotionally, physically, or both) even the most tragic of situations. The finest example of this proclivity for survival can be seen in the literature from World Wars I and II. Much of the writing from this period exhibits narratives, both non-fiction and derivative, that demonstrate the human spirit’s desire and ability to survive in any conditions.
...ar, O’Brien was able to turn his pain into a life purpose by immortalizing his loved ones. On the other hand, Bowker was not able to cope and resorted to taking his own life. In high-pressure environments such as war, instinct is the dominating force behind one’s actions. It is something inherent and extremely difficult to change for it corresponds with the person’s deepest desires. Therefore, instinctive reactions are accurate portrayals of a person’s inner identity and character. The cases of Bowker and O’Brien prove that it is the discovery of oneself during war, and not war itself, that has a profound impact on the human spirit.