Confederate Monuments Argumentative Essay

227 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Confederate monument essays

I think believe that everybody has a hero in their life whether it is Goku or Vegeta or even a Police Officer or a FireFighter either way everyone will need assistance in some point in their life. Confederate monuments represent those heros. By tearing down confederate monuments, the govt. is causing people to forget the horrible acts in history that they represented.(Brophy) Furthermore,I believe that we should keep the confederate monuments up so that people around the United States don't forget our great acts in history,because if we forget our history it could repeat itself over and over again. We must acknowledge the good with the bad and not tear down the monuments.(Brophy) To continue,Monuments should also stay

Show More
Related

  • Brown versus Board of Education and Raising the Confederate Flag

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...more overpowering and overwhelming than any general feeling of Southern pride. America has obtained a reputation to be an accepting and open minded country, welcoming all of any race, couture and religion. The Preamble states clearly that America will establish justice and insure domestic tranquility for all. Neither of these entities are accomplished in America as long as the Confederate flag remains raised. Our nation is furthermore divided by racism through a flag that is possibly being used as a degradation tool. This battle with racism has become far too large for American citizens and anything that is viewed as racist in such a manner as the Confederate flag is, should be censored from society, in only a helpful practice. A state flag should be capable of uniting its citizens, instead of dividing them. The Confederate flag should be lowered immediately.

    Read More

  • Essay On Confederate Soldiers

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    During winter months, basic huts were constructed from wood when it was available. During the civil war, most of the soldiers fought only 75 percent of the time. When they were not fighting, their day usually started at 5:00 in the morning during the summer and spring, and 6:00 in the morning during the fall and winter. Soldiers would be awakened by fifes and drums, then the first sergeant would take a roll call, and all the men sat down to eat breakfast. During the day, soldiers would be engaged in sometimes as many as five 2-hour long drill sessions on weaponry or maneuvers.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Mayor Landrieu's Statue

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lee, Jefferson Davis, and P.G.T. Beauregard statues were not erected just to honor these men, but are a part of the movement which became known as The Cult of the Lost Cause” (Landrieu 2017). Basically, Mayor Landrieu is emphasizing that the statues put up for those men were put there to honor them and support a cult that wanted slavery and believed that people of color were less than human. During his speech, Mayor Landrieu quotes Alexander Stephens and says “cornerstone rests upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery -subordination to the superior race- is his natural and normal condition” (Landrieu 2017). In making this comment Landrieu urges us to realize that the confederate statues are not there to remember the people that fought in the civil war but to honor them. By keeping the statues, the people of New Orleans are reminded every day that thousands of people were sold and bought, they were raped and forced to work. These quotes support the claim because they are both about how the statues are atrocious and how they are on the wrong side of history. Both quotes establish that removing the confederate statues would benefit New Orleans because young children would not have to be exposed to hatred and racism. To the defenders of the confederate statues Mayor Landrieu says “There is a difference between remembrance of history and

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Confederate Flag

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    Therefore, the flag presents a symbol of southern pride and heritage. With that being said, all Americans should be allowed to live in a country where they feel safe and free from hatred. If a historical symbol fuels hatred, violence, and fear, then the display of such a symbol would only misinterpret the meaning of the land of the free. Although there are many pros and cons to the Confederate flag, it is only just to ban the flag.

    Read More

  • Gary Shapiro's The Meaning Of Our Confederate

    577 Words  | 2 Pages

    Recently there has been news about people heavily wanting Confederate statutes to be taken down due to their relation with slavery. While many have their own views on the matter, one in particular stands out. The view of preserving them in a way that’ll keep both sides happy and to preserve the history behind them. This “contextualized” view, as discussed in Gary Shapiro’s “The Meaning of Our Confederate ‘Monuments’” I believe should not only be applied to the Confederate statutes but other monuments and memorials as well. Memorials being made in order to remember an event or person, while a monument is made in order to honor an event or person(Shapiro). While it is in fact very reasonable to want to take these statutes down due to evil background, they are still a part of history. Instead, we should follow the “contextualized” view and add context to all monuments and memorials as their meanings change throughout time.

    Read More

  • Confederate Flag Research Paper

    494 Words  | 1 Pages

    For the people that don't know why others support the flag, I will give reasons why it is not a racist symbol but more of a religious and historical symbol. First I will talk about historical meaning. In December 1860, South Carolina decided to secede from the Union just months after an Anti-Slavery Republican named Abraham Lincoln was elected as president. In April 1861 at Fort Sumter, South Carolina the first shots of the Civil War were fired. After South Carolina seceded, 10 other states would soon follow in its footsteps and form the Confederate States of America or the CSA. The Confederate Flag currently under “attack” is better known as the

    Read More

  • Confederate Monuments Dbq

    575 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the south, in places such as Charlottesville, VA, there are monuments and statues up all over cities and towns, these are racist statues that illustrate a dark part of American history. These monuments were statues of confederate soldiers and confederate officers that fought to keep slavery alive. In the North in places like New York there are statues of a man that some believe is a great man, but overall he caused another bad part of American history. These statues of Christopher Columbus were put up to celebrate the man that “discovered America” but this man also took America away from its indigenous people, the Native Americans. Columbus monuments and Confederate monuments should both be taken down across the country. Some of these monuments should be destroyed and some should be removed and placed in history museums because they are a part of American history, but all of these statutes should be taken down.

    Read More

  • Confederate Flag Research Paper

    649 Words  | 2 Pages

    Controversy over the flying of the Confederate flag is rampant in today’s society. Specifically, whether the flags should be flown in public places such as schools, courthouses, and capitols. The Confederate flag has been flown over many state capitol buildings. Men across the southern half of the United States died simply for the ideas of that very flag. The flag memorializes the sons of the South who died during the Civil War. The men who lost their lives battling for the Confederacy were not simply fighting over slavery, they were engaging in battle for other very important factors such as trade, tariffs, and state rights. The Confederate flag should be allowed to be flown over public places such as schools, courthouses, and capitols because it captures the essence of American

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Confederate Statues

    1315 Words  | 3 Pages

    The monuments have not created racism in America, and are not the reason that white supremacist groups exist. The removal of these monuments would not stop the KKK from holding rallies, recruiting members, and existing. If the statues are torn down, it would have no effect on the high school dropout rate. In an article on the website, nationalreview.com, Deroy Murdock says “…black Americans still would face a national unemployment rate 7.4%...” In this statistic, Murdock provides an argument in defense of the statues. Throughout the article he provides statistics and information that support the theory. Tearing down the Confederate monuments will in no way improve the lives of any person. Beyond the lack of improvement everyone won’t see in their day to day lives, there will be no improvement in the battle against racism and white supremacy. According to the website, nationalreview.com, Kyle Smith, the author, says, “If a statue that has been standing in your city for years suddenly sends you into paroxysms of destructive rage, you are really determined to create a problem for yourself, and you’ll create another problem when it’s gone.” This statement speaks to the argument that the statues are so offensive that people feel the need to vandalize and tear them down. Even if the statues would be torn down in an effort to console those few Americans who find

    Read More

  • Confederate Flag Thesis

    55 Words  | 1 Pages

    Recent headlines have reignited debates over the the Confederate Flag as protests against recurring police brutality have heightened awareness of enduring racism in America. Some have raised their eyes to the Confederate Monument on the Denton Square to wonder aloud why it remains. Read on to find some answers that are neither simple nor

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Removing Confederate Monuments

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lee, Stonewall Jackson, or any other Confederate war heroes, the Confederate Monuments should remain in public places. Their image is typically tarnished because they fought for the South, it’s hard for people to look beyond that. Instead of seeing people who were fighting for a cause in what they believed in, they see them as symbols of hatred and racism. It may not have been the cause to fight for, but they were essentially fighting to maintain their source of income. Slavery was a huge part of the Souths income at the time, so once the idea abolishing slavery came about they felt they must take a stand to keep their source of income alive and well. “Abraham Lincoln made it clear that there would be no trials or punishments for the rebels who fought for the Confederacy, and that the national agenda would be reconciliation not retribution” (Herman, National Review). So why after all these years should we remove these monuments of prominent figures in our nation’s history, if the man who abolished slavery didn’t lay down any punishments? “They are monuments to timeless virtues, not to individuals” (Herman, National Review). Removing the monuments now would be a disservice to the men that lost their lives fighting for the virtues that they believed in. Ben Jones of the New York Times makes a great point as well as he used the Confederate flag as his talking point in the article “Does the Confederate

    Read More

  • Confederate Flag Analysis

    379 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are frequent appearances of conflicts in the incident of Michigan police in Traverse City. The major and most obvious conflict is the incompatibility or opposition between parties over the presence of the confederate flag. The cause of this intergroup conflict can be ambiguity of jurisdictions and symbols as well as the absence of conflict-management strategies as there is no precise and accepted way of what the confederate flag really represents. According to the conflict intensity continuum, which is a model that measures the intensity level of a conflict, the debate over confederate flag is in the middle lies between “no conflict” and “annihilatory conflict” where there are assertive verbal attacks but not overt efforts to destroy

    Read More

  • Confederate Monument Controversy

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Denton Confederate Monument, erected in 1918 by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, is hotly debated on the basis of what the monument represents. Advocates for the removal of the monument maintain that it is a glorification of slavery and racism that cannot be tolerated. Proponents for its retention argue that it is a tribute to the soldiers who died in the Civil War. The monument is in the style of a triumphal arch, with the Confederate soldier set atop it. These formal elements suggest both that the Confederacy won the war, and by extension that the racism of the Confederacy is still alive, and that the Confederate soldier is dominant over the viewer, similar to the way in which

    Read More

  • Analysis of Tony Horwitz's Book, Confederates in the Attic

    1878 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...et the wrongs they’ve suffered, even if these tribulations were justified. But mostly forgetting history poses a serious threat to the future. Sometimes we do need to know where we’ve been in order to know where we’re going. However, remembering is also a sticky subject. Debates erupt about which history is correct, and which should be remembered. It’s also a matter of enthusiasm as much as anything else. Remembering the Civil War as many Northerners and Southerners remember the war, as a war that happened, had certain ramifications, and otherwise doesn’t affect contemporary life, is much easier to justify and deal with than a zealous attitude toward a "Lost Cause." It is just that great enthusiasm leads to reverence for ancestors that do not necessarily deserve it. Still, it is not as if any individual can decide for another which ancestors are worth revering.

    Read More

  • African American Heritage

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    This is no more so true than with Confederate Veterans, and the racial and political motivations that have, in some way, lived through the decades. Though the sesquicentennial over the conflict has just recently passed, many issues of contention and struggles over Confederate iconography in the American public still dominate certain realms within the historical discourse. Groups such as the Sons of Confederate Veterans still exist in some meaningful number in modern times, and still fight for what they view is the protection of their heritage. Memory – particularly when it comes to war – is a peculiar thing. The impact of this sort of historical memory seems deepened by the intense personal nature of civil rebellion, and widened by the physical access to so much of the history in lands, documents and artifacts. It is, indeed, a curiously American idea to -- in many places -- honor those who sought to break away from the nation. It is likely that these questions and observations cannot be fully answered by the historical record alone. Much of it, admittedly, is victim to interpretation, and the roles culture, upbringing and regionalism play in the way Americans recognize their heritage. That alone is a concept worth its own study. However, it seems true that Southern heritage cannot ever truly escape the racial and political problems of its past, if it is forthright in its presentation. Gregory P. Downs, writing on the way American’s memory of war is shaped, mentioned this in perfect summary. He wrote, “By severing the war’s conflict from the Reconstruction that followed, it drains meaning from the Civil War and turns it into a family feud, a fight that ended with regional reconciliation. It

    Read More

More about Confederate Monuments Argumentative Essay

Open Document