Pros And Cons Of Confederate Statues

1315 Words3 Pages

Should the Confederate Statues Stay? Recently in Arizona a statue of Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States, was covered in tar and feathers. This vandalism is a product of the movement to remove Confederate memorials and statues across the United States. America has been split over the removal of these statues. Many Americans have found the Confederate memorials offensive, racist, and endorsing white supremacy, while others see them as mere reminders of our nation’s history. However, the question still stands: Should the Confederate memorials be removed because some Americans find them offensive? This situation has sparked several rallies and even the defacement of statues and public property. In my opinion, the …show more content…

They represent the historical figures of the South during that time period: strategists, leaders, generals, and soldiers who fought to protect their rights as independent states and not slave-owners. If the reason that 27 percent of the country wants the removal is that the statues represent slavery, then the statues should remain for the simple reason that they do not endorse slavery. In an article by the website, dallasnews.com, many Americans sent in letters voicing their opinions on what the Confederate statues mean. According to that website, Brian Baldwin says, “My Northern schooling taught respect for Robert E. Lee’s military skills. That’s how I understand his statue in Lee Park.” Many other Americans agree with Baldwin’s opinion. Another website, denverpost.com, also published letters they were sent by everyday Americans on this subject. In the letter from this website, Bob Mesenbrink says, “They[the statues] were put up in recognition of great, albeit imperfect, leaders of the South, those who served our country well before the Civil war, but who were faithful to their home state.” He goes on to add, “But if these monuments do remind us of slavery, perhaps that is a good thing. Let’s leave them up to remind future generations of the past.” I agree with this argument as it recognizes that …show more content…

The monuments have not created racism in America, and are not the reason that white supremacist groups exist. The removal of these monuments would not stop the KKK from holding rallies, recruiting members, and existing. If the statues are torn down, it would have no effect on the high school dropout rate. In an article on the website, nationalreview.com, Deroy Murdock says “…black Americans still would face a national unemployment rate 7.4%...” In this statistic, Murdock provides an argument in defense of the statues. Throughout the article he provides statistics and information that support the theory. Tearing down the Confederate monuments will in no way improve the lives of any person. Beyond the lack of improvement everyone won’t see in their day to day lives, there will be no improvement in the battle against racism and white supremacy. According to the website, nationalreview.com, Kyle Smith, the author, says, “If a statue that has been standing in your city for years suddenly sends you into paroxysms of destructive rage, you are really determined to create a problem for yourself, and you’ll create another problem when it’s gone.” This statement speaks to the argument that the statues are so offensive that people feel the need to vandalize and tear them down. Even if the statues would be torn down in an effort to console those few Americans who find

Open Document