Shame In A Technological Age
Many people have fallen victim of shame and as our culture advances, shame adapts whether it’s spread through social media or personally. Shame is a feeling of deep humiliation because of a wrongful behavior or the public’s action of condemning an unlawful doing. When these intense emotions are not dealt with appropriately it can be unhealthy for the brains development as well as our mental health. Shame has been a part of our society for generations as a method to deter individuals from committing crimes, creating safer communities; however, the use of shame should be controlled to stop people from using humiliation as a tool to degrade others through modern communication.
In some cases, shame is efficient because
…show more content…
As a country we have established laws and have established punishments based on the degree of the offense. Shame can be extremely detrimental to our mental health, and its effect can be so powerful and ultimately destroys one’s life. Teens are especially vulnerable as frequent social media users. Many are not able to cope with the intense emotion of humiliation and can cause individuals to take life-threatening decisions, apparent in the case of Izabel Laxamana. After, her father publicly shamed the teen on video for sending a “selfie” to a boy she “flung herself off a bridge onto a freeway” (Perry p.4). Izabel was only 13 years old, the feeling of shame overwhelmed her, leading to her death. The fathers impulse to shame his daughter as possibly a means of parenting, had devastating effects on his daughter. Culture, religion or a variety of factors could have played a role in this situation, regardless, as a society it is important to educate older and newer generations of the impacts of social media shaming or bullying. Now we have various programs and suicide prevention groups that can …show more content…
Lewinsky was once a young White House intern who had an affair with the President, Bill Clinton. Within a day popular magazines featured her story, she received countless online threats and fell victim to constant public humiliation. She states, “Overnight I went from a completely private figure to a publicly ashamed one”(Lewinsky). As the Clinton scandal became the public’s focus, the public treated her in unimaginable ways. Monica was also one of the first to become victim of things “going viral” and the rapid dissemination of information and mass media. On top of this, there was little to no awareness of its impacts because it was nuanced. During her talk, she remembers her parents fearing that she would be humiliated to death (Lewinsky). She became so traumatized that she couldn’t even lead a normal life for about ten years. Demonstrating that shame is not a proper way to deal with social order as it can negatively alter a person’s life. Although there is more awareness of public shaming, it does not lessen the impact on individuals and our society still needs to implement programs or assistance. To strengthen our society, we must encourage and support individuals rather than tear them down. For the greater good of humanity, shame should be controlled to avoid
Sometimes there’s nothing more powerful than a personal story of tragedy and perseverance. With poise, humor and emotional pleas, Monica Lewinsky is able to captivate her audience through her narrative – one known to many in a public sense but far more vulnerable and moving when told through her private moments. Lewinsky’s speech, titled “The Price of Shame,” shares a broad call to action against cyberbullying and online harassment, highlighted by her own battles and a devastating tale of a young man who inspired her to finally speak out. Decades of silence create a sense of expectation among the audience. It also automatically captivate Lewinsky’s listeners as they hang on every word from someone they’ve heard so much about – but never from. Over the course of this paper, I will analyze Lewinsky’s TED Talk as a persuasive speech meant to galvanize listeners to recognize and actively combat cyberbullying in an age where many try to capitalize and profit on public humiliation. I will show how her persuasive style is effective with respect to her personal expertise and gut-wrenching stories, while also recognizing areas – like her call to action – where her argument could be strengthened and better delineated to
Using Feminist criticism to analyze the discourse surrounding and as well as by the speaker, Monica, I aim to reveal how women's place in society led by the Feminist's has changed due the sex scandal and where it maybe headed next. In looking at this aspect of the scandal it becomes crucial not just to analyze the discourse of Feminists and Monica but to find it in a larger scheme of a society which shapes many of the gender roles and pressures put on individuals to look and act in certain ways. There is an evident change in the role of women in American society that has occurred as a result of the scandal which is important not just to the Feminists and their supporters but to any female who enters the public arena and is faced with pressures and expectations put on them as a result of their gender.
After claiming that he never asked anyone “to lie, to hide or destroy evidence or take any other unlawful action”, his tone shifts back from defensive to guilty and shameful. Clinton relies, in the second half of his speech, on the repetition of the word ‘private’, to redirect the guilt from himself to the nosey American people. He uses this as a shame tactic, in attempt to reinforce that he is not solely to blame for his actions. He uses alliteration in saying that “it is time to stop the pursuit of personal destruction and the prying into personal lives”, which illustrates his irritability with having his personal life in the spotlight. He later goes on to say that, “I intend to reclaim my family life for my family. It’s nobody’s business but ours”, which suggests, by his use of the word “my”, that President Clinton doesn’t believe that he is solely to blame for what occurred. He later goes on to say that, “I take my responsibility for my part in all of this”, which suggests, by his use of the word “my”, that President Clinton doesn’t believe that he is solely to blame for his actions, both in his private relationship with Ms. Lewinsky and for lying under
Shame and guilt are often used interchangeably as they are often perceived to be the same or eerily similar. Yet shame is more associated with feelings of poor personal character and guilt is associated with what a person’s character does. Studies have shown that shame rather than guilt is a significant risk factor for the onset and maintenance of mental health difficulties and it has been further theorized that guilt is actually an adaptive response in which movement from shame to guilt represents a stage of mental health recovery (Dyer, et al., 2017). Though shame over particular events in the moment are not uncommon due to humanities imperfect nature, the problem resides in lack of shame resolution. May (2007) exemplifies this in that the
On August 17, 1998, exactly one year after making the statement above, President Bill Clinton prepared to deliver a speech concerning a scandal that had gripped the nation for months. It is needless to say that this was an important moment during the Clinton administration. After accusations of sexual harassment, Clinton addressed the nation and admitted to having a relationship with Monica Lewinsky. In this critical speech Clinton set out to admit to wrong-doings, provide a few reasons for his action, and ultimately persuade the audience into moving on and forgetting the scandal. This essay will break down his speech into sections and examine the most and least effective strategies that Clinton employed and how well he executed those strategies. This is an interesting speech given under rare circumstances. Not since Watergate had an American president been under such harsh moral criticism from the public. By looking critically at this speech we are able to gain valuable insight into Clinton's motives.
The Lewinsky Scandal rocked the lives of Bill and Hillary Clinton while in office. Monica Lewinsky was just an unpaid intern that started a sexual relationship with Mr. Clinton who at the time was the President of the United States. This event was the most important thing to happen in 1998. It showed how even as president you can fall to temptation like any other human being. Challenging the trust of the American people for the president raising questions like “Can we trust this man?”, “Should we let this relationship slide and pretend it never happened?” To this day people are still talking about this scandal making it one of the most famous scandal to date.
Hillary Clinton is an important character in the impeachment process and the sex scandal in general. As Bill Clinton’s wife, she is the most personally involved with the President, as well as the most personally involved in the subject matter involved with the impeachment. Since Bill Clinton’s wrong-doings stem from sexual misconduct, as his wife, Hillary Clinton has an extremely great involvement. Due to her great involvement in this personal matter, the public audience seems to associate their thoughts with her own (34% of the public thought that the scandal was a personal matter as long as Hillary Clinton was fine with it [U.S. News]). Meaning, the public feels that if Bill Clinton’s sexual affairs are accepted by Hillary, then they should be accepted by the country as well. It is important to look at how Clinton gets her points, what her motives are in doing so, and where her motives stem from because she is so influential regarding the President’s image. It is also important to look at the sexual misconduct between the President and Ms Lewinsky, as well as Hillary’s decision to support her husband, from the First Lady’s situation since women and their concerns are often forgotten when analyzing political discourse.
Shame originates from those who do not comprehend others. When individuals are different in any way, such as race, gender, status or even sexual orientation, those who do not understand them or their situation dive right into judgement and then result in shame. Sexual orientation shaming has history behind it which has damaged love in so many ways, the shaming continues even today.
In the article “The Shame Culture,” David Brooks is expressing his opinions on today’s colleges awash in moral judgement. He states many college students watch their words in fear to be accused as being incorrect. Many students feel they need to post to social media in order not be judged. Andy Crouch a Christianity Today publisher popularized between the guilt culture and the shame culture. In a shame culture, you believe what your community says about you, whether it honors or rejects you. In a guilt culture, you sometimes fell as you are doing something bad. Social media has created a shame culture where if you are not on Facebook and Instagram you dread of being expulsion and condemned. Finally, in an era full of social media its
...y. Publicly hurting others shows everyone just how much they were hurting themselves. Basically all of our mass media platforms of our society, such as television, video games, music, internet, movies, could potentially wear down the humanity, or in a way, the innocence, of the teens. This allows them to find violence as a potentially acceptable, or at least desensitize, to some extent, them to the actual magnitude of murder and violence. They see it as an easy way of gaining attention. People always want to point fingers when these tragedies happen, they want to find a scapegoat, and they try to pin the events on someone else. Teenagers all want attention and when they feel neglected or mad at the world for not having attention, they see violence as a great way of getting what they have always felt they deserved, no matter whose toes they have to step on to get it.
Shame is like a dark shadow that follows us around, making us second guess what we are about to do, and always something we refuse to talk about. As Brown puts it, shame “derives its power from being unspeakable.” If we recognize our shame and speak about it, it’s like shining a flashlight on it; it dies. This is why vulnerability and shame go hand in hand. We must embrace our vulnerability in order to talk about shame, and once we talk about shame and release ourselves from its bonds, we can fully feel vulnerable and use that vulnerability to find courage and dare greatly. In order to reach this level of wholeheartedness, we must “mind the gap,” as Brown says, between where we are and where we want to end up. We must be conscious of our practiced values and the space between those and our aspirational values, what Brown calls the “disengagement divide.” We have to keep our aspirations achievable, or disengagement is inevitable. Minding this gap is quite a daring strategy, and one that requires us to embrace our own vulnerability as well as cultivate shame resilience. Accomplishing our goals is not impossible if we simply cultivate the courage to dare to take action. We can’t let this culture of “never enough” get in our way, and we have to use our vulnerability and shame resilience to take that step over the
For most societies the basic definition of shame can be broken down into categories, for example: shame could be the loss of face, meaning somebody causes another person to feel embarrassment or to have their reputation tarnished in some way. Shame can also be related to loss of personal honor or degrading of a person’s social status. Shame is often times revealed in times of disaster or in the face of some form of catastrophe.
Shame is a painful emotion, it will stop you in your tracks. Isn’t shame supposed to do that though? Shame is like an alarm going off telling your brain “Hey, I don’t think your behavior matches your values right now. You need to check yourself.” Most of the time the values pushed into your head were formed by grownups telling you what was right from wrong. It is wrong for boys to cry, or for women to get pregnant out of wedlock. But the real question is, is shame necessary and is it good or bad for society? Shame is an essential ingredient of a healthy society. Shame acts as a form of moral regulation; it can regulate behavior that would be considered unwise, deflate egos, and help people work better not just individually but as a team.
All people, regardless of race, gender, or profession, feel shame in their lives. Shame is defined as humiliation caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behaviour. Shame researcher Brené Brown in a Ted Talk defined guilt as “I’m sorry for this mistake” whereas shame is “I am a mistake.” She also stated that vulnerability is not weakness, and shame teaches creativity, emotional risk, courage, and innovation. Shame for not satisfying society’s standard of perfection leads people of different races and genders to hate themselves, to hide their flaws, and not to take the opportunities they want, when in reality making mistakes is human. Brown concludes that shame is an epidemic in our culture, and empathy is the antidote. In American society,
From "thintastic" blogs to suicide stories, social media has become not only a source of conversation but a gateway to harmful suggestions that many teenagers see and believe to be allowable, when in fact the situations proposed are dangerous to those who attempt them. Statistics show that 20% of anorexic teenagers will die prematurely, and 80% of teenagers who commit suicide are depressed (South). Social media has glorified and brought to attention eating disorders, depression, and suicide among teens that might otherwise not become a statistic in these critical categories.