Comparison Of The Divine Comedy Inferno And Dante's Inferno

1080 Words3 Pages

Both, Dante’s The Divine Comedy, Inferno and The Canterbury Tales is the story of how different kinds of sins are being punished, and is the reflection of what is justice according to both writers. Both, stories have characters that are on religious journey, and both are epic poems. Also, a first person narrator tells both works, and the purpose of these works is to deliver a message to viewers through their stories. But, Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales is more realistic, less religious, and reaches its purpose of delivering a message comparing with Dante’s Inferno. Geoffrey Chaucer was born around 1340, in London, Great Britain. He was a court writer during the rule of Edward III and Richard II. He had many acquaintances within nobles of that time. During his job, court writer, he observed the immoralities in the court, and as a reaction wrote his works. His purpose of his works was to entertain, and he mostly used the English language in order to deliver his work to as many people (to both noble, and not noble people) as possible, because French was the noble language, and English was a speaking language. Chaucer uses different kinds of people as his character, to deliver a real story. The Canterbury Tales is the most famous work of the Geoffrey Chaucer. It consists of the tales …show more content…

Souls being punished depending on Christian sins. Chaucer’s work is religious too, but it is less religious, because in his stories he uses high sins like rape, greed, drunkenness, while Dante punishes someone who did not commit themselves to either good or to bad (someone who could not decide to be bad or good). For example; in The Wife of Bath’s Tale/Inferno the knight who raped a woman was charged in a death sentence, on the other hand Dante in Canto 3 places people in hell just because they could not decide to whether to commit themselves for good or for evil. Punishments are different in both

Open Document