Comparing Rice And Dolgin's Analysis

794 Words2 Pages

The following theorists emphasized different aspects of the physical and cognitive development of adolescents, but each has been equally important in establishing the understanding of human development that we have today. Rice and Dolgin (2007) explain that G. Stanley Hall focused on the biological aspect of an individual’s development, believing that it mirrors the evolutionary history of their predecessors. With this in mind he likened infancy to an animalistic state, childhood to the state of a hunter and the state of preadolescence to that of a savage. Once an individual had progressed beyond these developmental phases and entered adolescence, they experienced a significantly emotionally tumultuous period that he called “sturm und drang”. …show more content…

He was of the belief that social interaction helps to develop cognitive skills, and asserted that learning takes place most effectively when an adolescent is paired with a more competent partner and faced with a difficult task. The cognitive development that takes place under these circumstances is accelerated if the more competent individual provides scaffolding (the dynamic where a skilled individual lends their help to a partner accomplish a task, holding back as their partner grows more competent). Because of the presumed effectiveness of this practice, Vygotsky strongly advocated group work over individual work as a teaching mechanism when dealing with …show more content…

In this effort, Bronfenbrenner created an ecological model to explain how external influences affect the adolescent at each level. The most direct facet of this model is the Microsystem, which consists of the individuals that the adolescent comes into direct contact like family members, friends and members of the church they attend that they interact with. Because of its nature, microsystems are subject to change as the adolescent moves in and out of various groups like joining a sports team, starts or stops going to church or starts spending time with a different group of friends. Bronfenbrenner emphasizes the increased influence that peer groups typically have on adolescents, with these either playing positive or negative roles. It’s emphasized by Rice and Dolgin (2007) that healthy microsystems are essential to positive development and success going into adulthood. A second structure that is discussed is the Mesosystem, which refers to reciprocal relationships and best understood as such, for example how friend circles affect an adolescent’s life at home, and vice-versa. These are uniquely significant, since they don’t operate independently as other systems do, but can either have positive or negative effects on multiple facets of life. Another structure discussed by Bronfenbrenner is the

Open Document