Comparing Poems By E. Cummings And Langston Hughes

446 Words1 Page

A poem by E.E. Cummings and Langston Hughes appeared to share some similarities. The poems are “i sing of Olaf glad and big” and “I, Too” and both are closely related to Walt Whitman’s, Song of Myself. Whitman wrote a long poem celebrating himself. Cummings writes about how war is considered good, but Olaf feels very opinionated about the topic. Cummings express his opinions through this character, "i sing of Olaf glad and big/ whose warmest heart recoiled at war"(1-2). Cummings informs the reader that Olaf recoils at the topic of war which indicates that Cummings too dislikes war. Hughes poem expresses his thoughts about the topic of racism. In the poem hughes says, “I, too, sing America”(1), which goes along with the title of Cummings poem. Both authors talked about touchy subjects around their time period. I think both brought back the whole idea of Whitman’s “Song of myself” of being out of society’s norms of keeping opinions to oneself. …show more content…

Cummings has always strayed himself out of the right way of writing in the first place, like he includes grammatical errors throughout his writings. In "i sing of Olaf glad and big" Cummings does not stick to a length of each stanza, some are like full paragraphs while some are just two lines. Which to me he chose to do that because the story behind the poem is rebellious as well. It gives double effect, and it means that Cummings did not care what people thought because he had the right to be opinionated. Langston Hughes does the same thing he did not include a rhyme scheme to his poem "I, Too". He was straightforward with his poem, showcasing that both authors are not ashamed to rebel against the right way of

Open Document