Comparing My Sister's Keeper And The House Of The Scorpion

355 Words1 Page

Many people donate organs, regarding for cancer patients. In the movie “My Sister’s Keeper” and the book, “The House of The Scorpion” There are two donors. I genuinely believe that being a donor is good, if you don’t necessarily need it, or if you don’t necessarily do anything likewise active. Donating can be good because one person could legitimately need it, and you don’t need it so much. Many people think being a donor is a good thing, but again at the same time, people think it’s a bad idea.

Organ donors give up things they want to do. For example, in the movie “My Sister’s Keeper” Cate is in need of a donor, so her sister Anna is created to give her body parts to Cate. Anna was “ fine with it” when she was five, or so her mother says. After a while she wanted to enjoy her life and do sports. Previously, Cate said she wanted to leave, Anna had to give up everything she wanted to do. Many other people have to do what Anna did for cate. They have to be very cautious and very careful with their surroundings and what they do. Donors are very helpful for people in need. …show more content…

Also, it states, “27% of New Yorkers age 18 and over have enrolled in the New York State Donate Life Registry as organ. tissue and eye donors. Nationwide, the average is 50%.” Many people help. The success rate is 80 to 90 percent, according to “Live on NY
To come to a conclusion, I believe that organ donors are a good thing. They help others in need, they put others before themselves, and they give up things for themselves for others to live. Donors are very helpful to people, especially the ones in need. Donors are like bees to flowers. The bees help the flowers, just like how the Donors keep the patients alive, or at least healthier than they were

More about Comparing My Sister's Keeper And The House Of The Scorpion

Open Document