Comparing Eusebius 'And Bhagavad-Gita'

1141 Words3 Pages

After the death of Constantine in 337, Eusebius started writing the biography of this great Roman emperor who first adopted Christianity as the official religion of the state. The Bhagavad-Gita is believed to be completed between 4th century BCE and 4th century CE, basically from King Ashoka’s unification of India to the reign of Gupta Empire. Why did religious leaders write these texts during that time? What is their true intention? Although one may assume that Eusebius and the Bhagavad-Gita were trying to reinforce the supremacy of gods, with a close reading of Eusebius’ work and the Bhagavad-Gita, there is no doubt that they were actually fortifying the authority of rulers of that time. One can see their effort to strengthen the theocracy in that both Constantine and Arjuna were closely related to gods through direct contacts, that both Constantine and Arjuna were taking actions legitimized by gods, and that Eusebius and Sanjaya, as religious leaders, acted and spoke in such a way that would increase the credibility of …show more content…

As stated by Eusebius, Constantine called on God with “earnest prayer and supplications that he[God] would reveal to him[Constantine ] who he[God] was.” From the Bhagavad-Gita, when Krishna revealed his real form to Arjuna, Arjuna was shocked by the divine vision of universal-discipline. “My limbs sink, my mouth is parched, my body trembles, the hair bristles on my flesh”(The Bhagavad-Gita), said Arjuna. Eusebius spared no effort to describe the piety of Constantine before God. The Bhagavad-Gita seems to emphasize the insignificance of secular beings in front of divine spirit. These texts were not propaganda to justify military actions; they were simply indoctrination of religious ideas that gods is superior to materialistic

Open Document