Compare And Contrast The Children Act 1989 And 2004

672 Words2 Pages

While at university I developed knowledge of the Children Act 1989 and 2004 and how to apply them in practice along-side other legislation required children and family social worker. The Children Act 1989 allocates duties to local authorities, courts, parents and other agencies to ensure that children's welfare is paramount and are safeguarded. This legislation supports children being brought up by their families and making provisions for families that are experiencing challenges and when families cannot co-operate with statutory bodies.

The Children Act 1989 introduced numerous principles which include: the welfare of the children (paramountcy principle), parental responsibility, provisions of services for children in need, duty to investigate, police powers, emergency protection powers, care orders. This legislation gave the …show more content…

The Laming enquire concluded that legislation and guidance in the UK required improvements. Initially, introduced the green paper Every Child Matter which identified five outcomes for children which are: be healthy, stay safe, enjoy achieving, making a positive contribution and achieving economic well-being. The Lord Laming report also lead to the introduction of the Children Act 2004.

The Children Act 2004 stats that the welfare of children and young people are paramount in all considerations of safeguarding which is everyone's responsibility. Safeguarding can only be achieved by improving working together to deliver more integrated services for children and young people which included health, education and development, safety and economic circumstances. The legislation is aimed at improving children and young people live for services to work in partnership. This targets universal services that children access and specialist services that are accessed by those that have additional

Open Document