Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on war movies
The role of leadership in military
Leadership and the army profession, pdf
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on war movies
Dunkirk and The Darkest Hour are both films that center around the evacuation at Dunkirk, but from two different perspectives. The Darkest Hour begins with the selection of Winston Churchill as Prime Minister, replacing Neville Chamberlain. It focuses around Churchill’s decisions about World War II, especially those regarding the evacuation of Dunkirk, and ends with the launching of Operation Dynamo. Dunkirk is a retelling of the evacuation of Dunkirk from three different military perspectives: land, air, and sea, each with its own story as each occurs at different times throughout the evacuation. Eventually, all three stories tie in together as the soliders return home and are celebrated as heroes, but not without the horrors of war instilled …show more content…
For example, Churchill is criticized by many political leaders for lying to the public about the success of the British military in the war, a decision which may have been made in the interest of the government despite its false basis. Furthermore, Churchill’s election is shown not at the result of his potential as a good leader, but rather because he was the only option that the opposition party would accept: many people agreed to him becoming Prime Minister not because they believed he would succeed, but because it was in the interests of their political careers. Military leaders are largely irrelevant, mainly seen as pawns who can be directed to fulfill the purpose of the war. In contrast, in Dunkirk, political leaders are never mentioned aside from Churchill’s Operation Dynamo. The perspective of the battlefield portrays these political leaders as distant, and …show more content…
Darkest Hour shows a top down view of the war, with many scenes in a war room in which Churchill makes decisions featuring a large map with colored dots and arrows. One of the primary conflicts surrounding the war is the tension between striking a peace treaty and refusing to give in to Hitler’s demands. As a political move, Churchill’s opponents attempt to get him to admit that he will not even attempt to make peace with Hitler, while Churchill tries to defend staying at war. Near the end of the movie, Churchill interacts with the British citizenry directly, asking them whether or not they would like to stay at peace or go to war- the citizens strongly support defending their land. Churchill’s reasoning for staying at war is both a nationalistic sense of pride and the fear that Hitler will not stop his conquest despite a peace treaty: “You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth!” as Churchill states. War, in this sense, is depicted in an idealistic way: fought for the defense of the homeland. Losses, while tragic, are in the form of numbers, and citizens still have the support of the war. In Dunkirk, the horrors of war are actualized. Compared to the citizens’ overwhelming will to fight in Darkest Hour, the soldiers in Dunkirk are tired of the war and are simply trying to survive. Although it seems as if they would like to be able to fight back, the
Through his speeches, he tried to persuade America to join in the fight against the growing power if Nazism. One of his speeches are “The Lights Are Going Out”. He said this speech in 1938, to the people of the United States. The purpose of his speech was to encourage the US to join forces with Britain to overtake Nazi Germany. The subject of his speech is the loss of other countries, and America joining the war, and the tone of the speech is urgency. Churchill’s word choices in his speech “The Lights Are Going Out” are effective through his use of rhetoric and vocal techniques.
The United States of America has experienced many tragic events in its history. The attack on pearl harbor and the terrorist attack on September 1, 2001 happen to be the most significant. These both tragic events affected the lives of many. These both events had a quite both different and same presidential response. These historical events changed the way people would live in everyday life for a while. Both of these tragedies made history and will never be forgotten and all of those innocent lives that were taken away on December 7th, 1941 and September 11, 2001.
He showed real beneficial points of production which I agreed how production could change the population especially changing the variety of working, but I criticized on the disadvantages of mass production he mentioned. This is because one company could offer more money to their people which having money is the aim of most of us, so when a place offer money, it has more beneficial rather than disadvantages. However, Churchill described the main differences of WWI and previous wars which were significant points because it is true that a lot of damages were caused in WWI that destroyed most people’s lives, and the cause of the wars is not indicated in any places. Also, it told the way of how Generals and armies are not heroes which I precisely disagree his point because people fight for their families and protect them from enemies. That’s why they need to fight and are seen as heroes but not heroes of their country, heroes of their family. In addition, he also described future wars which WWI had recently ended in his time, but he predicted to have another war which will be much cruel. It was true because WWII happened and caused more damages to the world; many women and children died with it. This was an extraordinary prediction because how someone can predict the future and become reality? However, as he mentioned peace was in people’s heart and was more important than having wars as
The attacks on Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941 were the first attacks ever to take place on American soil, the repercussions were devastating for the Japanese Empire; sadly, Pearl Harbor would not be the last threat America faced on her own land. On September 9th, 2011 (9/11) a radical Islāmic terrorist group known as Al-Qaeda attacked America. While America dealt with both of these attacks with unyielding resolve, executing that resolve was what is starkly different between the two tragedies. Pearl Harbor did have some quintessential similarities to 9/11; both attacks unprovoked by America, both provoked public support against aggressors by way of presidential speeches, both lacked prior intelligence on the attacks themselves, both sparked
By fighting their respective battles for a cause they know to be just, Odysseus and Churchill display their sense of justice and righteousness. Upon his return home, Odysseus is beset by one hundred suitors wishing to claim his position as king. After preliminary skirmishing, and the suitors advancing upon Odysseus and his three supporters, Odysseus finally gives the order for fighting to break out in full force: “Now I say, friends, the time is overdue to let them have it. Battlespoil they want from our dead bodies to add to all they plundered here before” (Homer 417). Churchill, however, has war approach him in the form of the Nazi occupied Germany. Recognizing the war as more than simple bloodshed, he declares, “It is a war, viewed in its inherent quality, to establish, on impregnable rocks, the rights of the individual, and it is a war to establish and revive the stature of man” (War Speech n. pag). The Nazi regime is widely known and hated today for the atrocities committed against those who opposed their views. Practitioners of the Jewish faith, political opponents, intellectuals...
Is it a bird? Is it a Plane? Or is it a Hitler?: Holocaust Vs. 9/11
Gilbert, Martin. "Churchill and the Holocaust: The Possible and Impossible." The Churchill Centre. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Feb. 2014.
To this very day, this speech remains as one of the most influential and unforgettable speeches concerning World War II. Churchill’s remarkable speech was delivered after the events of the Dunkirk Evacuation, which forced 336,000 Allied troops to retreat from Dunkirk to Britain. Because of this Nazi power being exerted over allied forces, Churchill had to make sure his speech was profound and direct. He wanted to enthuse and excite the British people and to cause urgency that difficult times were upon them and an inevitable crisis was on the horizon. Churchill’s had articulated an essential determination and urgency to defend Britain “no matter what the cost”. He conveyed a message of necessary unity that was required to win the war and to fend off the Nazi influence and assault. Churchill wanted ...
It is fair to say that some people may view Dunkirk as a Defeat for
World War II and The Revolutionary war have many things in common with each other.World War II is a well known war and it lasted from 1939-1945. The Revolutionary war is also a well known war that lasted from 1775-1783. In the Revolutionary War it was between the American and British but many people got involved with the war.In World War II it was between the Jews and Nazi but many people helped the jews than the nazis.The first contrast is the technology that they had when they went to war.
Winston Churchill was a British prime minister from 1940-1945. Churchill was a statesman, orator, and author, most importantly he was a great leader. He is best remembered for successfully leading Britain through World War II. He held authentic, and inspiring speeches in attempt to keep his country’s spirits up. In which he succeeded.
By examining Churchill’s use of rhetoric we can see what exactly made him such a great leader. His speeches were able to do more damage to the Nazis than any bomb could have done because his language rallied the people together. His use of repetition proved his points and reminded the country of what mattered most. His descriptive words helped build up anger against the Nazi rule and persuade everyone to pull through the tough times. He used pronouns in such a way that it would personalize everything and help unify his country. Through his unique use of words Churchill was able to convince many that if they could just endure that they would at last be victorious (Bungay).
as a defeat. I think this was mainly due to the loss of troops and
Winston Churchill was perhaps one of the greatest public speakers in history. Some of the best speeches have come from being in life or death situations, Winston was known best for this. His small sound clips like, “this was their finest hour”, and “this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning”, encourage his troops and his people that they will win this war and will overcome the greatest odds. Although Churchill told many speeches, his speech on June 18, 1940 showed the most emotion and courage of any other speech he told. In this speech he explained that the war in France is over and the war in Britain would begin. He said that if we fail then the world sink into an abyss. This emotion that he shows would give Britain hope, courage and most of all determination.
Six hours later, France would also declare war on Germany. In May 1940, Britain would get a more aggressive pro-war leader, Winston Churchill, to replace Neville Chamberlain. Later that month, on May 26, 1940, in the face of a large-scale German attack, British soldiers on the home front were forced to perform one of the largest evacuations in history, The Evacuation of the British Expeditionary Force from Dunkirk on the Belgian coast. From July through October, the British people suffered during the Battle of Britain, which was a lot of intense German bombings. But, the Royal Air Force successfully defended its homeland from the German Luftwaffe, and the Nazis were unable to crush British morale.