Civil Disobedience: The Rise And Fall Of The British East India Company

827 Words2 Pages

In the 1757 , the British East India Company began to gain control of India, but through the use of civil disobedience, independence was able to be obtained. Civil disobedience is the refusal to obey laws that are considered to be unjust. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, better known as Mahatma Gandhi, is known for his use of non-violent resistance. In the 1600s, 80 English merchants joined together to form the British East India Company, after being inspired by a Dutch company gaining enormous profits by spice trades. The British East India Company imported and exported many spices, and soon amassed in wealth. In addition, the British East India Company manipulated the indigenous population, by having smaller states pay for military protection, Later, the company would break the smaller states down, and soon, take over. The British East India Company ended up buying a majority of …show more content…

Days prior to the Amritsar Massacre, the city of Amritsar was put under martial law. With General Dyer in control of the city, he banned any type of gatherings or meetings in the city. In 1919, the day of the Amritsar Massacre, there was a gathering of a couple thousand unarmed Indian protesters. When the British found out, they squared up thousands of men and shot to kill. The result of the shooting were hundreds of deaths, along with thousands of shootings. The fact that the British did such a negative action, it gained international attention. This event was known as the Amritsar Massacre. This can be looked as as a non-violent resistance because of the fact that the Indian protesters were unarmed and chose not to fight back. Whilst the British troops were attacking them, they did not strike back. (USE DOC. EX: ¨AN EYE FOR AN EYE MAKES THE WHOLE WORLD BLIND¨ [POSSIBLE QUOTE?]). Because of the Amritsar Massacre, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, better known as Mahatma Gandhi, pursued in a campaign for full

Open Document