The ideals of chivalry are inextricably linked with the medieval period, and even today it is an ideal we still pay lip service to. Many historians however have questioned whether the knights and nobility of the time actually took it any more seriously than we do. Johan Huizinga described it as “a cloak for a whole world of violence and self-interest” , an “illusion of society [that] clashed with the reality of things” , and in our rather cynical age, this is probably the predominant view of the middle ages. Nonetheless, it is not a view that has gone unchallenged by more recent historians, and even Huizinga concedes that for the nobility, chivalry constituted “an amazing self-deception” , an ideal that resonated with many young nobles who wanted to believe in it, for all its impracticalities.
However, in order to answer the question of whether chivalry was actually given any credence, we must establish what chivalry was understood to mean. Modern conceptions of chivalry are quite different to those held by the knights who saw no contradiction between chivalrous behaviour and the tactic of the chevauchée, the burning and ravaging of the enemy's countryside. As Keen wrote, chivalry “is a word that was used... with different meanings and shades of meaning by different writers and in different contexts” . It could simply refer to a “collective of chevaliers [knights]” , or a social class “whose martial function... was to defend the patria and the Church” , or to a set of values, “an ethos in which martial, aristocratic and Christian elements were fused together” . It is this last form of chivalry, as a personal code of conduct that guided the decisions of the knights and nobility, that attracts the interest of historians. Natural...
... middle of paper ...
...The Waning of the Middle Ages, Doubleday Anchor, Garden City, New York, 1954
Kaeuper, Richard W. Chivalry and Violence in Medieval Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991
Kaeuper, Richard W. and Kennedy, Elspeth. The Book of Chivalry of Geoffroi de Charny, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1996
Keen, M. Chivalry, Yale University Press, London, 1984
Keen, M. H. “Chivalry, Nobility, and the Man-at-Arms” in War, Literature, and Politics in the Late Middle Ages, C. T. Allmand (ed), Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, 1976
Llull, Ramon. The Book of the Order of Chivalry, Sam Houston State University Press, Huntsville, Texas, 1991
Strickland, Matthew. War and Chivalry;the conduct and perception of war in England and Normandy, 1066-1217, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996
Vale, Malcolm. War and Chivalry, Duckworth, London, 1981
Ioannides, Panos. “Gregory.” Across Cultures: a Reader for Writers. 3rd ed. Eds. Sheena Gillespie, and Robert Singleton. Needham Heights, NJ: Allyn and Bacon, 1996. 339-403.
Huppé, Bernard F. "The Concept of the Hero in the Early Middle Ages." Concepts of the Hero in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Eds. Norman T. Burns & Christopher J. Reagan. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1975.
Richard Barber first published The Knight and Chivalry in 1970. At the time, not a whole lot had been written on the subject of chivalry. Thus, Barber can be viewed is sort of an original scholarly writer on this subject matter. His work is extensive. In this particular book he covers the following concepts: the transition of the Knight from mounted warrior, chivalry and literature, chivalry in the field, chivalry in religion, and finally, chivalry in the state. All five parts present pages of rich text. However, I will be dealing specifically on the concept of chivalry and literature. My reason is this: to the reading it was done in MDVL 145, heroes and villains, I am more inclined to look at the author’s own ideas in relation to other literature circa the 12th century, in a critical manner. Thus the purpose.
In the Medieval Period, knights dedicated their lives to following the code of chivalry. In Sir Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur, a number of characters performed chivalrous acts to achieve the status of an ideal knight. Their characteristics of respect for women and courtesy for all, helpfulness to the weak, honor, and skill in battle made the characters King Arthur, King Pellinore, and Sir Gryfflette examples of a what knights strove to be like in Medieval society. Because of the examples ofchivalry, Le Morte d’Arthur showed what a knight desired to be, so he could improve theworld in which he lived.
The Lais of Marie de France, particularly “Bisclavret”, “Laustic”, and “Lanval”, interact with the chivalric code in varying ways. Honor, valiance, and courtly love are all included in the overall umbrella of chivalry, as are heightened moral expectations. Through storytelling, Marie de France calls into question the existence of true chivalry in knights, and investigates the effects of greed, lust, and anger when placed in powerful hands. “Bisclavret” reveals that motives of personal gain can be present and empowered in knighthood, “Laustic” juxtaposes two knights of opposite civil stature to express that some individuals do indeed possess chivalry, and “Lanval” represents the idea that even the pure of heart cannot escape the evil present
First, The Knight is an extraordinary character because of his excess amount of chivalry. Chivalry is the medieval knightly system with its religious, moral, and social code. “And at a Knight I therefore will begin. There was a Knight, a most distinguished man, who from the day on which he first began, To ride abroad had followed chivalry, Truth, h...
Saul's 'For honour and chivalry' is a realistic and synoptic portrayal of Medieval chivalric culture - extending from 1066, when the Normans first introduced chivalry to England, up to the commencement of the Tudor dynasty in the 15th Century. He explores a plethora of pertinent topics, including: the use and impact of the cult of Arthurianism on politics and warfare, the treatment of women and the military customs abided by soldiers for personal glory and honour. The structure of the book us unique. It does not document events chronologically but thematically. Saul traces the metamorphosis of chivalric culture throughout the ages and the evolving prestige associated with 'knighthood' in elite echelons of society. This amalgam of topics is
Chivalry is a huge and consist theme in Sir Thomas Mallory’s fifteenth century work on, Le Morte d’ Arthur. One of the greatest knights in this story that portrays chivalry is Lancelot. Although Lancelot embodies chivalry he also challenges it in some of the things that he does. Lancelot fails in a certain aspect in chivalry because he is unable to restore his loyalty to the king, King Arthur, and his oath that he made to respect his wife, Guenevere. Lancelot’s failure is represented throughout the story when he can not find a way to uphold both chivalry and courtly love.
In this brief monograph, we shall be hunting down and examining various creatures from the bestiary of Medieval/Renaissance thought. Among these are the fierce lion of imperious, egotistical power, a pair of fantastic peacocks, one of vanity, one of preening social status, and the docile lamb of humility. The lion and the peacocks are of the species known as pride, while the lamb is of an entirely different, in fact antithetical race, that of humility and forgiveness. The textual regions we shall be exploring include the diverse expanses, from palace to heath, of William Shakespeare, the dark, sinister Italy of John Webster, and the perfumed lady's chambers of Ben Jonson and Robert Herrick.
Charles Kingsley says, “Some say that the age of chivalry is past, that the spirit of romance is dead. The age of chivalry is never past, so long as there is a wrong left undressed on earth.” Around the 1200’s, the tale of King Arthur and Merlin started to emerge and show the way of how knights lived in their days. When we think of King Arthur, we think of knights, swords, jousting, and the roundtable, but there was a code in which all of these were influenced by. If you were to be a knight, you were to live under a code called chivalry, which is kind of like the Anglo-Saxon code to the Anglo-Saxon warriors. Although, the Anglo-Saxon code and chivalry are two different things, but they are kind of similar in a way: they are both are guidance manuals. In the story,
Keen opens his book with an introductory chapter examining three literary works pertaining to chivalry: the Ordene de Chevalerie, the Book of the Ordre of Chyvalry, and the Book of Chivalry. All three of these were written during a period of great religious reform, yet, according to Keen, they appear to not have been influenced by the ideas of the Church. The Ordene de Chevalerie is an anonymous poem that stresses the importance of the ritual required for initiation into knighthood. The popularity of the piece leads to the conclusion that the poem reflects “what men understood chivalry to mean” (8). This poem is then contrasted by the Book of the Ordre of Chyvalry, a narrative work written by Ramon Lull that describes in detail the origins and meaning of chivalry. A consideration of Geoffrey de Charny’s ...
... has changed drastically. During the Middle Ages, chivalry was a code of brave and courteous conduct for knights. During the Middle Ages, the people who lived during this time use chivalry as a code of conduct .There are some forms of Chivalry today but to a smaller degree than in the Middle Ages. Some examples of chivalry today are helping the elderly, family, and friends with some activities. It’s not possible to be as chivalrous as the knights in the Middle Ages were because our lifestyles have changed. Since the beginning of the Middle Ages, chivalry has been an important part of life. Society had high expectations for knights. Knights strictly followed by these rules and were punished both physically and socially if they broke them. They had many responsibilities such as protect the church, serve their lord, protect the weak and practice courtly love(Chivalry).
Closely associated to the romance tradition are two idealized standards of behavior, especially for knights: courage and chivalry. The protagonist within many medieval romances proved their worth by going on quests, as many a knights went in those times, thus returning with great tales of their travels and deeds. Many modern people think of chivalry as referring to a man's gallant treatment of women, and although that sense is derived from the medieval chivalric ideal, chivalry could be seen as more than that. Knights were expected to be brave, loyal, and honorable-sent to protect the weak, be noble to...
In today’s society the differences in morals between the rich and the poorer classes are virtually non-existent, but during Medieval times “morals and, above all, the virtues at its center, played an important role not only for distinguishing between good and bad, but, more importantly, even for the structuring of society” (Virtus 1). The aristocracy class and the immoral poor class had morals but how they demonstrated them varied; the aristocratic class used chivalry as the basis of their morals, while the immoral poor class did not. Chivalry was not only a code of conduct for those who followed it; chivalry was a way of life. ‘Chivalry first arose in Europe during the Crusades.
Douglas, J. D., Philip Wesley Comfort and Donald Mitchell. Who's Who in Christian History. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House, 1992.